Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Numerical simulation of surface solar radiation over Southern Africa. Part 2: projections of regional and global climate models

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the second part of this study, possible impacts of climate change on Surface Solar Radiation (SSR) in Southern Africa (SA) are evaluated. We use outputs from 20 regional climate simulations from five Regional Climate Models (RCM) that participate in the Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment program over the African domain (CORDEX-Africa) along with their 10 driving Global Climate Models (GCM) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5). Multi-model mean projections of SSR trends are consistent between the GCMs and their nested RCMs. However, this consistency is not found for each GCM/RCM setup. Over the centre of SA, GCMs and RCMs project a statistically significant increase in SSR by 2099 of about + 1 W/m2 per decade in RCP4.5 (+ 1.5 W/m2 per decade in RCP8.5) during the DJF season in their multi-model means. Over Eastern Equatorial Africa (EA-E) a statistically significant decrease in SSR of about − 1.5 W/m2 per decade in RCP4.5 (− 2 W/m2 per decade in RCP8.5) is found in the ensemble means in DJF, whereas in JJA SSR is predicted to increase by about + 0.5 W/m2 per decade under RCP4.5 (+ 1 W/m2 per decade in RCP8.5). SSR projections are fairly similar between RCP8.5 and RCP4.5 before 2050 and then the differences between those two scenarios increase up to about 1 W/m2 per decade with larger changes in RCP8.5 than in RCP4.5 scenario. These SSR evolutions are generally consistent with projected changes in Cloud Cover Fraction over SA and may also related to the changes in atmosphere water vapor content. SSR change signals emerge earlier out of internal variability estimated from reanalyses (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts Reanalysis ERA-Interim, ERAIN) in DJF in RCMs than in GCMs, which suggests a higher sensitivity of RCMs to the forcing RCP scenarios than their driving GCMs in simulating SSR changes. Uncertainty in SSR change projections over SA is dominated by the internal climate variability before 2050, and after that model and scenario uncertainties become as important as internal variability until the end of the 21st century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abba Omar S, Abiodun BJ (2017) How well do CORDEX models simulate extreme rainfall events over the East Coast of South Africa? Theor Appl Climatol 128:453–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1714-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Abiodun BJ, Abba Omar S, Lennard C, Jack C (2016) Using regional climate models to simulate extreme rainfall events in the Western Cape, South Africa. Int J Climatol 36:689–705. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4376

    Google Scholar 

  • Abiodun BJ, Adegoke J, Abatan AA, Ibe CA, Egbebiyi TS, Engelbrecht F, Pinto I (2017) Potential impacts of climate change on extreme precipitation over four African coastal cities. Clim Change 143:399–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-017-2001-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Albrecht BA (1989) Aerosols, cloud microphysics, and fractional cloudiness. Science 245:1227–1231

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartók B et al (2017) Projected changes in surface solar radiation in CMIP5 global climate models and in EURO-CORDEX regional climate models for Europe. Clim Dyn 49:2665–2683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3471-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellouin N, Rae J, Jones A, Johnson C, Haywood J, Boucher O (2011) Aerosol forcing in the climate model intercomparison project (CMIP5) simulations by HadGEM2-ES and the role of ammonium nitrate. J Geophys Res Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011jd016074

    Google Scholar 

  • Buontempo C, Mathison C, Jones R, Williams K, Wang C, McSweeney CJCD (2015) An ensemble climate projection for Africa. Clim Dyn 44:2097–2118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2286-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen OBDM, Christensen JH (2006) The HIRHAM regional climate model version 5. DMI Tech Rep 06–17:22

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins W et al (2011) Development and evaluation of an earth-system model-HadGEM2. Geosci Model Dev 4:1051. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-4-1051-2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook KH, Vizy EK (2006) Coupled model simulations of the West African monsoon system: twentieth- and twenty-first-century simulations. J Clim 19:3681–3703. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli3814.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook KH, Vizy EK (2013) Projected changes in East African rainy seasons 26:5931–5948. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00455.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppola E et al (2014) Present and future climatologies in the phase I CREMA experiment. Clim Change 125:23–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1137-9

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook JA, Jones LA, Forster PM, Crook R (2011a) Climate change impacts on future photovoltaic and concentrated solar power energy output. Energy Environ Sci 4:5. https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ee01495a

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook JA, Jones LA, Forster PM, Crook R (2011b) Climate change impacts on future photovoltaic and concentrated solar power energy output. Energy Environ Sci 4:3101–3109

    Google Scholar 

  • Davy RJ, Troccoli A (2012) Interannual variability of solar energy generation in Australia. Sol Energy 86:3554–3560

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee D et al (2011) The ERA-interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system. Q J R Meteorol Soc 137:553–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Deser C, Phillips A, Bourdette V, Teng HJCD (2012) Uncertainty in climate change projections: the role of internal variability. Clim Dyn 38:527–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0977-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Diasso U, Abiodun BJ (2017) Drought modes in West Africa and how well CORDEX RCMs simulate them. Theor Appl Climatol 128:223–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-015-1705-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosio A (2016) Projection of temperature and heat waves for Africa with an ensemble of CORDEX regional climate models. Clim Dyn 49:493–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3355-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosio A (2017) Projection of temperature and heat waves for Africa with an ensemble of CORDEX regional climate models. Clim Dyn 49:493–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-016-3355-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosio A, Panitz H-J (2015) Climate change projections for CORDEX-Africa with COSMO-CLM regional climate model and differences with the driving global climate models. Clim Dyn 46:1599–1625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2664-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosio A, Panitz H-J, Schubert-Frisius M, Lüthi D (2015) Dynamical downscaling of CMIP5 global circulation models over CORDEX-Africa with COSMO-CLM: evaluation over the present climate and analysis of the added value. Clim Dyn 44:2637–2661. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2262-x

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufresne J-L et al (2013) Climate change projections using the IPSL-CM5 earth system model: from CMIP3 to CMIP5. Clim Dyn 40:2123–2165

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne JP et al (2012) GFDL’s ESM2 global coupled climate-carbon Earth System Models. Part I: Physical formulation and baseline simulation characteristics. J Clim 25:6646–6665

    Google Scholar 

  • Endris HS et al (2013) Assessment of the performance of CORDEX regional climate models in simulating East African rainfall. J Clim 26:8453–8475. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00708.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Fant C, Adam Schlosser C, Strzepek K (2016) The impact of climate change on wind and solar resources in southern Africa. Appl Energy 161:556–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.042

    Google Scholar 

  • Favre A et al (2016) Spatial distribution of precipitation annual cycles over South Africa in 10 CORDEX regional climate model present-day simulations. Clim Dyn 46:1799–1818

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotso-Nguemo TC et al (2017) On the added value of the regional climate model REMO in the assessment of climate change signal over Central Africa. Clim Dyn 49:3813–3838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-017-3547-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaetani M, Huld T, Vignati E, Monforti-Ferrario F, Dosio A, Raes F (2014) The near future availability of photovoltaic energy in Europe and Africa in climate-aerosol modeling experiments. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 38:706–716

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Díez M, Fernández J, Vautard R (2015) An RCM multi-physics ensemble over Europe: multi-variable evaluation to avoid error compensation. Clim Dyn 45:3141–3156

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgetta MA et al (2013) Climate and carbon cycle changes from 1850 to 2100 in MPI-ESM simulations for the coupled model intercomparison project phase 5. J Adv Model Earth Syst 5:572–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F, Bi X (2000) A study of internal variability of a regional climate model. J Geophys Res Atmos 105:29503–29521. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900269

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F, Jones C, Asrar GR (2009) Addressing climate information needs at the regional level: the CORDEX framework. World Meteorol Organ Bull 58:175

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi F et al (2014) Changes in extremes and hydroclimatic regimes in the CREMA ensemble projections. Clim Change 125:39–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1117-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Glotfelty T, Zhang Y (2017) Impact of future climate policy scenarios on air quality and aerosol-cloud interactions using an advanced version of CESM/CAM5: Part II. Future trend analysis and impacts of projected anthropogenic emissions. Atmos Environ 152:531–552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2016.12.034

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham LP, Andréasson J, Carlsson B (2007a) Assessing climate change impacts on hydrology from an ensemble of regional climate models, model scales and linking methods—a case study on the Lule River basin. Clim Change 81:293–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9215-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham LP, Hagemann S, Jaun S, Beniston M (2007b) On interpreting hydrological change from regional climate models. Clim Change 81:97–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9217-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Haensler A, Saeed F, Jacob D (2013) Assessing the robustness of projected precipitation changes over central Africa on the basis of a multitude of global and regional climate projections. Clim Change 121:349–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0863-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzianastassiou N, Matsoukas C, Fotiadi A, Pavlakis K, Drakakis E, Hatzidimitriou D, Vardavas I (2005) Global distribution of Earth’s surface shortwave radiation budget. Atmos Chem Phys 5:2847–2867

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins E, Sutton R (2009) The Potential to Narrow Uncertainty in Regional Climate Predictions. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 90:1095–1108. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009bams2607.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins E, Sutton R (2011) The potential to narrow uncertainty in projections of regional precipitation change. Clim Dyn 37:407–418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0810-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins E, Sutton R (2012) Time of emergence of climate signals. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011gl050087

    Google Scholar 

  • Haywood J, Boucher O (2000) Estimates of the direct and indirect radiative forcing due to tropospheric aerosols: a review. Rev Geophys 38:513–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Haywood JM, Bellouin N, Jones A, Boucher O, Wild M, Shine KP (2011) The roles of aerosol, water vapor and cloud in future global dimming/brightening. J Geophys Res Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JD016000

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazeleger W et al (2012) EC-Earth V2. 2: description and validation of a new seamless earth system prediction model. Clim Dyn 39:2611–2629

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Díaz L, Laprise R, Sushama L, Martynov A, Winger K, Dugas B (2013) Climate simulation over CORDEX Africa domain using the fifth-generation Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM5). Clim Dyn 40:1415–1433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-012-1387-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussain M, Rahman L, Rahman MM (1999) Technical note: techniques to obtain improved predictions of global radiation from sunshine duration. Renew Energy 18:263–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob D et al (2012) Assessing the transferability of the regional climate model REMO to different coordinated regional climate downscaling experiment (CORDEX) regions. Atmosphere 3:181–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerez S, Montavez JP, Jimenez-Guerrero P, Gomez-Navarro JJ, Lorente-Plazas R, Zorita E (2013) A multi-physics ensemble of present-day climate regional simulations over the Iberian Peninsula. Clim Dyn 40:3023–3046

    Google Scholar 

  • Jerez S et al (2015) The impact of climate change on photovoltaic power generation in Europe. Nat Commun 6:10014. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10014

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan DC, Kurtz SR (2013) Photovoltaic degradation rates—an analytical review. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 21:12–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.1182

    Google Scholar 

  • Journée M, Bertrand C (2010) Improving the spatio-temporal distribution of surface solar radiation data by merging ground and satellite measurements. Remote Sens Environ 114:2692–2704

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalognomou E-A et al (2013) A diagnostic evaluation of precipitation in CORDEX Models over Southern Africa. J Clim 26:9477–9506. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-12-00703.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J et al (2014) Evaluation of the CORDEX-Africa multi-RCM hindcast: systematic model errors. Clim Dyn 42:1189–1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1751-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjellström E, Nikulin G, Gbobaniyi E, Jones C (2013) Future changes in African temperature and precipitation in an ensemble of Africa-CORDEX regional climate model simulations. In: EGU general assembly conference abstracts, 2013, vol 15, EGU2013-4703. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013EGUGA..4715.4703K

  • Kvalevåg MM, Myhre G (2007) Human impact on direct and diffuse solar radiation during the industrial era. J Clim 20:4874–4883. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli4277.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Laprise R et al (2013) Climate projections over CORDEX Africa domain using the fifth-generation Canadian Regional Climate Model (CRCM5). Clim Dyn 41:3219–3246

    Google Scholar 

  • Lennard C, Nikulin G, Dosio A, Moufouma-Okia W (2018) On the need for regional climate information over Africa under varying levels of global warming. Environ Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aab2b4

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann U, Feichter J (2005) Global indirect aerosol effects: a review. Atmos Chem Phys 5:715–737

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas-Picher P, Caya D, de Elía R, Laprise R (2008) Investigation of regional climate models’ internal variability with a ten-member ensemble of 10-year simulations over a large domain. Clim Dyn 31:927–940

    Google Scholar 

  • Majaliwa J, Omondi P, Komutunga E, Aribo L, Isubikalu P, Tenywa M, Massa-Makuma H (2012) Regional climate model performance and prediction of seasonal rainfall and surface temperature of Uganda. Afr Crop Sci J 20:213–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti L, Coppola E, Sylla MB, Giorgi F, Piani C (2011) Regional climate model simulation of projected 21st century climate change over an all-Africa domain: comparison analysis of nested and driving model results. J Geophys Res Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2010jd015068

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariotti L, Diallo I, Coppola E, Giorgi F (2014) Seasonal and intraseasonal changes of African monsoon climates in 21st century CORDEX projections. Clim Change 125:53–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1097-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Meque A, Abiodun BJ (2015) Simulating the link between ENSO and summer drought in Southern Africa using regional climate models. Clim Dynam 44:1881–1900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2143-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Monerie P-A, Sanchez-Gomez E, Pohl B, Robson J, Dong B (2017) Impact of internal variability on projections of Sahel precipitation change. Environ Res Lett 12:114003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa8cda

    Google Scholar 

  • Monforti F, Huld T, Bódis K, Vitali L, D’isidoro M, Lacal-Arántegui R (2014) Assessing complementarity of wind and solar resources for energy production in Italy. A Monte Carlo approach. Renew Energy 63:576–586

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss RH et al (2010) The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463:747–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller B, Wild M, Driesse A, Behrens K (2014) Rethinking solar resource assessments in the context of global dimming and brightening. Sol Energy 99:272–282

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JM, Sexton DM, Barnett DN, Jones GS (2004) Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430:768. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02771

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutayoba E, Kashaigili JJ (2017) Evaluation for the performance of the cordex regional climate models in simulating rainfall characteristics over Mbarali River Catchment in the Rufiji Basin. Tanzan J Geosci Environ Prot 05:139–151. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2017.54011

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikulin G et al (2012) Precipitation climatology in an ensemble of CORDEX-Africa regional climate simulations. J Clim 25:6057–6078. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-11-00375.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Padmakumari B, Soni VK, Rajeevan MN (2017) Trends in radiative fluxes over the Indian region. In: Rajeevan MN, Nayak S (eds) Observed climate variability and change over the Indian region. Springer, Singapore, pp 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2531-0_9

    Google Scholar 

  • Paeth H et al (2011) Progress in regional downscaling of west African precipitation. Atmos Sci Lett 12:75–82. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl.306

    Google Scholar 

  • Panitz H-J, Berg P, Schädler G, Fosser G (2012) Modelling near future regional climate change for Germany and Africa. In: High performance computing in science and engineering ’11. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23869-7_36

  • Panitz H-J, Dosio A, Büchner M, Lüthi D, Keuler K (2014) COSMO-CLM (CCLM) climate simulations over CORDEX-Africa domain: analysis of the ERA-Interim driven simulations at 0.44 and 0.22 resolution. Clim Dyn 42:3015–3038. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-1834-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifroth U, Kothe S, Müller R, Trentmann J, Hollmann R, Fuchs P, Werscheck M (2017) Surface radiation data set—Heliosat (SARAH)—edition 2. Satell Appl Facil Clim Monit. https://doi.org/10.5676/eum_saf_cm/sarah/v002

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifroth U et al (2018a) Satellite-based trends of solar radiation and cloud parameters in Europe. Adv Sci Res. https://doi.org/10.5194/asr-15-31-2018

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifroth U, Sanchez-Lorenzo A, Manara V, Trentmann J, Hollmann R (2018b) Trends and variability of surface solar radiation in europe based on surface- and satellite-based data records. J Geophys Res Atmos 5:6. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017jd027418

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto I et al (2016) Evaluation and projections of extreme precipitation over southern Africa from two CORDEX models. Clim Change 135:655–668. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1573-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl B, Rouault M, Roy SS (2014) Simulation of the annual and diurnal cycles of rainfall over South Africa by a regional climate model. Clim Dyn 43:2207–2226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-013-2046-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohl B, Macron C, Monerie P-A (2017) Fewer rainy days and more extreme rainfall by the end of the century in Southern Africa. Sci Rep 7:46466

    Google Scholar 

  • Prein AF et al (2015) A review on regional convection-permitting climate modeling: demonstrations, prospects, and challenges. Rev Geophys 53:323–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Räisänen J (2001) CO2-induced climate change in CMIP2 experiments: quantification of agreement and role of internal variability. J Clim 14:2088–2104. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2001)014%3c2088:ciccic%3e2.0.co;2

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly J, Stone PH, Forest CE, Webster MD, Jacoby HD, Prinn RG (2001) Uncertainty and climate change assessments. Science 293:430–433. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062001

    Google Scholar 

  • Remund J, Müller SC (2010) Trends in global radiation between 1950 and 2100. In: 10th EMS annual meeting, 10th European conference on applications of meteorology (ECAM) abstracts, Sept 2010. pp 13–17. http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ems..confE.2414R

  • Rockel B, Will A, Hense A (2008) The regional climate model COSMO-CLM (CCLM). Meteorol Z 17:347–348

    Google Scholar 

  • Romanou A, Liepert B, Schmidt GA, Rossow WB, Ruedy RA, Zhang Y (2007) 20th century changes in surface solar irradiance in simulations and observations. Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006gl028356

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotstayn L, Jeffrey S, Collier M, Dravitzki S, Hirst A, Syktus J, Wong K (2012) Aerosol-and greenhouse gas-induced changes in summer rainfall and circulation in the Australasian region: a study using single-forcing climate simulations. Atmos Chem Phys 12:6377

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowell DP (2006) A demonstration of the uncertainty in projections of UK climate change resulting from regional model formulation. Clim Change 79:243–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9100-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummukainen M (2016) Added value in regional climate modeling. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Clim Change 7:145–159. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.378

    Google Scholar 

  • Saeed F, Haensler A, Weber T, Hagemann S, Jacob D (2013) Representation of extreme precipitation events leading to opposite climate change signals over the Congo Basin. Atmosphere 4:254. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos4030254

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelsson P et al (2011) The Rossby Centre Regional Climate model RCA3: model description and performance. Tellus A 63:4–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Shongwe ME, Lennard C, Liebmann B, Kalognomou E-A, Ntsangwane L, Pinto I (2015) An evaluation of CORDEX regional climate models in simulating precipitation over Southern Africa. Atmos Sci Lett 16:199–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/asl2.538

    Google Scholar 

  • Simone R, Andrea FM, Sillmann J, Giuseppina I (2016) When will unusual heat waves become normal in a warming Africa? Environ Res Lett 11:054016

    Google Scholar 

  • Skoczek A, Sample T, Dunlop ED (2009) The results of performance measurements of field-aged crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules. Prog Photovolt Res Appl 17:227–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Stainforth DA et al (2005) Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature 433:403. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03301. https://www.nature.com/articles/nature03301#supplementary-information

  • Stjern CW, Kristjansson JE, Hansen AW (2009) Global dimming and global brightening—an analysis of surface radiation and cloud cover data in northern Europe. Int J Climatol 29:643–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Strandberg G et al (2015) CORDEX scenarios for Europe from the Rossby Centre regional climate model RCA4. RMK, Rapport Meteorologi och Klimatologi, vol 116, ISSN 0347-2116. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A948136&dswid=4809. SMHI

  • Tang C, Morel B, Wild M, Pohl B, Abiodun B, Bessafi M (2018) Numerical simulation of surface solar radiation over Southern Africa. Part 1: evaluation of regional and global climate models. Clim Dyn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4143-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of Cmip5 and the experiment design. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 93:485–498. https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-11-00094.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Tebaldi C, Knutti R (2007) The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365:2053–2075. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2007.2076

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichmann C et al (2013) How does a regional climate model modify the projected climate change signal of the driving GCM: a study over different CORDEX regions using REMO. Atmosphere 4:214–236. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos4020214

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjiputra J et al (2013) Evaluation of the carbon cycle components in the Norwegian earth system model (NorESM). Geosci Model Dev 6:301–325

    Google Scholar 

  • Twomey S (1977) The influence of pollution on the shortwave albedo of clouds. J Atmos Sci 34:1149–1152

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Meijgaard E, Van Ulft L, Van de Berg W, Bosveld F, Van den Hurk B, Lenderink G, Siebesma A (2008) The KNMI regional atmospheric climate model RACMO version 2.1, vol 43​

  • Van Vuuren DP et al (2011) The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim Change 109:5

    Google Scholar 

  • Voldoire A et al (2013) The CNRM-CM5. 1 global climate model: description and basic evaluation. Clim Dyn 40:2091–2121

    Google Scholar 

  • von Salzen K et al (2013) The Canadian fourth generation atmospheric global climate model (CanAM4). Part I: representation of physical processes. Atmos Ocean 51:104–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Vondou DA, Haensler A (2017) Evaluation of simulations with the regional climate model REMO over Central Africa and the effect of increased spatial resolution. Int J Climatol 37:741–760. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5035

    Google Scholar 

  • Watanabe M et al (2010) Improved climate simulation by MIROC5: mean states, variability, and climate sensitivity. J Clim 23:6312–6335

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild M (2009) Global dimming and brightening: a review. J Geophys Res Atmos. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd011470

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild M et al (2015a) The energy balance over land and oceans: an assessment based on direct observations and CMIP5 climate models. Clim Dyn 44:3393–3429

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild M, Folini D, Henschel F, Fischer N, Müller B (2015b) Projections of long-term changes in solar radiation based on CMIP5 climate models and their influence on energy yields of photovoltaic systems. Sci Direct Solar Energy 116:13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.03.039

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chao Tang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figs. 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24.

Fig. 12
figure 12

Projected annual CLT changes (2070–2099) from GCMs (1st column) and five embedded RCMs (2nd and 6th columns) in RCP8.5, expressed in absolute % with respect with the annual mean value of the reference period 1970–1999

Fig. 13
figure 13

Smoothed seasonal series of SSR anomalies of ten driving GCMs and 20 embedded RCMs along the 21st century under RCP8.5 for JJA for different sub-regions from GCMs (green) and the RCMs (red). Anomalies are computed with respect to the mean values in the reference period 1970–1999 and expressed in W/m2. Solid lines depict the multi-model mean values, with shadows showing the ensemble spread. Vertical bars depict 0 ± the multi-model means (GCMs or RCMs) of the standard deviation of the seasonal SSR anomalies in the period of 1970–2099 as representative of the internal variability, the “back-ground noise” of the climate change signal

Fig. 14
figure 14

The same as Fig. 13 but for CLT in absolute %

Fig. 15
figure 15

Standard deviation of detrended seasonal (JJA) series of SSR (left) from climate models (arithmetic mean of 20 RCMs or 10 GCMs) during period of 1970–2099, satellite data SARAH-2 during 1983–2015 and reanalysis ERA-Interim (ERAIN) during 1979–2015. Ratio between RCMs/GCMs and SARAH-2/ERAIN are on the right. The white area in the bottom right of SARAH-2 is out of its coverage

Fig. 16
figure 16

Standard deviation of detrended seasonal (DJF) series of SSR during the reference period of 1970–2099 from every single RCM and GCM. The unit is W/m2

Fig. 17
figure 17

Standard deviation of detrended seasonal (JJA) series of SSR during the reference period of 1970–2099 from every single RCM and GCM. The unit is W/m2

Fig. 18
figure 18

Time of Emergence (ToE) of SSR projections estimated using the mean internal variability from ERAIN, for JJA season

Fig. 19
figure 19

Time of Emergence (ToE) of SSR projections estimated using the mean internal variability from RCM/GCM models for DJF season

Fig. 20
figure 20

Time of Emergence (ToE) of SSR projections estimated using the mean internal variability from RCM/GCM models for JJA season

Fig. 21
figure 21

Time of Emergence (ToE) of SSR projections estimated using the internal variability from every single RCM/GCM model for DJF season in RCP8.5

Fig. 22
figure 22

Time of Emergence (ToE) of SSR projections estimated using the internal variability from every single RCM/GCM model for JJA season in RCP8.5

Fig. 23
figure 23

Projections of seasonal (JJA) mean SSR anomalies with respect to the reference period calculated as the mean value of the period from 1970 to 1999, with bold solid line indicating the multi-model mean (in the top row); different components of SSR variance estimated from different sources (Internal variability, scenario uncertainty and RCM/GCM uncertainty, mid row) and their fractional uncertainty (in 90% confidence level) as the ratio to the SSR change signal (bottom row) using outputs of simulations in Group I (7 RCM experiments under RCP2.6, RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, on the left) and Group II (all the 20 RCM experiments, but under only RCP4.5 and RCP8.5, on the right)

Fig. 24
figure 24

Multi-model mean atmosphere water vapor content trend (2070–2099 vs 1970–1999) in relative percentage with respect with the mean value in reference period, i.e. 1970–1999 in the unit of % per decade. Only significant trends at the 95% level are represented. Note that for the GCM trend (on the left), not all the 10 GCMs in Table 1 are included, with exception of PSL-CM5A-MR and NorESM1-M, because of data availability. For RCM trend (on the right), only outputs from 16 experiments conducted by 3 RCMs, namely CCLM, RCA4, and RACMO22T (see Table 2) are considered for the same reason. GCM outputs are remapped to the same typical GCM horizontal resolution of 1.12° × 1.12° (the resolution of EC-EARTH) for facilitating the calculations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, C., Morel, B., Wild, M. et al. Numerical simulation of surface solar radiation over Southern Africa. Part 2: projections of regional and global climate models. Clim Dyn 53, 2197–2227 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04817-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04817-x

Keywords

Navigation