Abstract
A theoretical investigation of climate stability and sensitivity is carried out using three simple linearized models based on the top-of-the-atmosphere energy budget. The simplest is the zero-dimensional model (ZDM) commonly used as a conceptual basis for climate sensitivity and feedback studies. The others are two-zone models with tropics and extratropics of equal area; in the first of these (Model A), the dynamical heat transport (DHT) between the zones is implicit, in the second (Model B) it is explicitly parameterized. It is found that the stability and sensitivity properties of the ZDM and Model A are very similar, both depending only on the global-mean radiative response coefficient and the global-mean forcing. The corresponding properties of Model B are more complex, depending asymmetrically on the separate tropical and extratropical values of these quantities, as well as on the DHT coefficient. Adopting Model B as a benchmark, conditions are found under which the validity of the ZDM and Model A as climate sensitivity models holds. It is shown that parameter ranges of physical interest exist for which such validity may not hold. The 2 × CO2 sensitivities of the simple models are studied and compared. Possible implications of the results for sensitivities derived from GCMs and palaeoclimate data are suggested. Sensitivities for more general scenarios that include negative forcing in the tropics (due to aerosols, inadvertent or geoengineered) are also studied. Some unexpected outcomes are found in this case. These include the possibility of a negative global-mean temperature response to a positive global-mean forcing, and vice versa.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexeev VA (2003) Sensitivity to CO2 doubling of an atmospheric GCM coupled to an oceanic mixed layer: a linear analysis. Clim Dyn 20:775–787
Alexeev VA, Langen PL, Bates JR (2005) Polar amplification of surface warming on an aquaplanet in “ghost forcing” experiments without sea-ice feedbacks. Climate Dyn 24:655–666
Anderson TL, Charlson RJ, Schwartz SE, Knutti R, Boucher O, Rodhe H, Heintzenberg J (2003) Climate forcing by aerosols—a hazy picture. Science 300:1103–1104
Andrews T, Forster PM, Gregory JM (2009) A surface energy perspective on climate change. J Clim 22:2557–2570
Barkstrom BR (1984) The earth radiation budget experiment (ERBE). Bull Am Meteor Soc 65:1170–1185
Bates JR (1999) A dynamical stabilizer in the climate system: a mechanism suggested by a simple model. Tellus 51A:349–372
Bates JR (2004) On climate stability, climate sensitivity and the dynamics of the enhanced greenhouse effect. In: Paleoclimate and the earth climate system. Proceedings of the Milutin Milankovitch anniversary symposium, Belgrade, September 2004, pp 27–46. Serbian Academy of Sciences. Also available at www.dclimate.gfy.ku.dk
Bates JR (2007) Some considerations of the concept of climate feedback. Quart J R Met Soc 133:545–560 (Erratum: p. 1071)
Bony S et al (2006) How well do we understand and evaluate climate change feedback processes? J Clim 19:3445–3482
Budyko MI (1969) The effect of solar radiation variations on the climate of the Earth. Tellus 21:611–619
Cai M (2005) Dynamical amplification of polar warming. Geophys Res Lett 32:L22710, doi:10.1029/2005GL024481
Cai M (2006) Dynamical greenhouse-plus feedback and polar warming amplification. Part I: A dry radiative-transportive climate model. Clim Dyn, doi:10.1007/s00382-005-0104-6
Charney JG et al (1979) Carbon dioxide and climate: a scientific assessment. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC
Chung E-S, Yeomans D, Soden BJ (2010) An assessment of climate feedback processes using satellite observations of clear-sky OLR. Geophys Res Lett 37:L02702, doi:10.1029/2009GL041889
Crutzen PJ (2006) Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma. Clim Change 77:211–219
Forster PMD, Gregory JM (2006) The climate sensitivity and its components diagnosed from Earth radiation budget data. J Clim 19:39–52
Graversen RG, Mauritsen T, Tjernström M, Källen E, Svensson G (2008) Vertical structure of recent Arctic warming. Nature 541:53–56
Hansen J, Lacis A, Rind D, Russell G, Stone P, Fung I, Ruedy R, Lerner J (1984) Climate processes and climate sensitivity. Geophysical Monograph. Am Geophys Union 29:130–163
Hansen J, Lacis A, Ruedy R, Sato M, Wilson H (1993) How sensitive is the world’s climate? Natl Geogr Res Explor 9:142–158
Hansen J et al (2005) Earth’s energy imbalance: confirmation and implications. Science 308:1431–1435
Harvey LD (2000) Global warming: the hard science. Prentice Hall, London, 336 pp.
Hoffert MI, Covey C (1992) Deriving global climate sensitivity from palaeoclimate reconstructions. Nature 360:573–576
Holland MM, Bitz CM (2003) Polar amplification of climate change in coupled models. Clim Dyn 21:221–232
IPCC (2001) Climate change 2001: the scientific basis. In: Houghton JT et al (eds) Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 881 pp.
IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S et al (eds) Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 966 pp.
Langen PL, Alexeev VA (2007) Polar amplification as a preferred response in an idealized aquaplanet GCM. Clim Dyn 29:305–317
Lin B, Wong T, Wielicki BA, Hu Y-X (2005) Reply. J Climate 18:2128–2131
Lindzen RS (1990) Dynamics in atmospheric physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 310 pp.
Lindzen RS (1993) Palaeoclimate sensitivity. Nature 363:25–26
Lindzen RS, Choi Y-S (2009) On the determination of climate feedbacks from ERBE data. Geophys Res Lett 36:L16705, doi:10.1029/2009GL039628
Lindzen RS, Choi Y-S (2010) On the observational determination of climate sensitivity and its implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci (submitted)
Lindzen RS, Chou M-D, Hou AY (2001) Does the earth have an adaptive infrared iris? Bull Am Meteor Soc 82:417–432
North GR, Cahalan RF, Coakley JA (1981) Energy balance climate models. Rev Geophys Space Phys 19:91–121
NRC (2005) Radiative forcing of climate change. National Research Council, Washington, DC, 207 pp.
Pierrehumbert RT (2009) Principles of planetary climate. Available online at http://geosci.uchicago.edu/~rtp1/ClimateBook/ClimateBook.html
Ramanathan V (1981) The role of atmosphere-ocean interactions in the CO2 climate problem. J Atmos Sci 38:918–930
Ramanathan V, Carmichael G (2008) Global and regional climate changes due to black carbon. Nat Geosci 1:221–227
Ramanathan V, Crutzen PJ, Kiehl JT, Rosenfeld D (2001) Aerosols, climate and the hydrological cycle. Science 294:2119–2124
Rasch PJ, Crutzen PJ, Coleman DB (2008) Exploring the geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulfate aerosols: the role of particle size. Geophys Res Lett 35:L02809, doi:10.1029/2007GL032179
Raval A, Oort AH, Ramaswamy V (1994) Observed dependence of outgoing longwave radiation on sea surface temperature and moisture. J Clim 7:807–821
Roe GH (2009) Feedbacks, timescales and seeing red. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 37:93–115
Schneider EK (1990) Linear diagnosis of stationary waves in a general circulation model. J Atmos Sci 47:2925–2952
Schwartz SE (2008) Reply to comments by G. Foster et al., R. Knutti et al., and N. Scafetta on “Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth’s climate system”. J Geophys Res 113:D15105, doi:10.1029/2008JD009872
Sellers WD (1969) A global climate model based on the energy balance of the earth-atmosphere system. J Appl Met 8:392–400
Trenberth KE, Fasullo JT, O’Dell T, Wong T (2010) Relationships between tropical sea surface temperature and top-of-atmosphere radiation. Geophys Res Lett 37:L03702, doi:10.1029/2009GL042314
Vallis GK, Farneti F (2009) Meridional energy transport in the coupled atmosphere-ocean system: scaling and numerical experiments. Q J R Meteorol Soc 135:1643–1660
Wallace JM, Hobbs PV (2006) Atmospheric science: an introductory survey, 2nd edn. Academic Press, London, 483 pp.
Wielicki BA et al (1998) Clouds and the Earth’s radiant energy system (CERES): algorithm overview. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 36:1127–1141
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Symbols and abbreviations
- \( \bar{x} \) :
-
global-mean value of x in the unperturbed equilibrium climate
- \( x^{\prime} \) :
-
\( x - \bar{x} \)
- a :
-
Earth’s radius (6,370 km)
- AMIP:
-
Atmospheric Model Intercomparison Project
- ASR:
-
absorbed solar radiation (by the earth-atmosphere system)
- b :
-
unit-area TOA radiative response coefficient [≡\( - \{ d\left( {F_{\rm TOA}^{ \downarrow } } \right)/dT\} /4\pi a^{2} \)]
- b 1 :
-
unit-area TOA radiative response coefficient in Zone 1 (the tropics) [≡ \( \{ - d\left( {F_{TOA}^{ \downarrow } } \right)_{1} /dT_{1} \} /2\pi a^{2} \)]
- b 2 :
-
unit-area TOA radiative response coefficient in Zone 2 (the extratropics) [≡ \( \{ - d\left( {F_{\rm TOA}^{ \downarrow } } \right)_{2} /dT_{2} \} /2\pi a^{2} \)]
- B99:
-
Bates (1999)
- B07:
-
Bates (2007)
- c O :
-
mixed-layer heat capacity per unit area
- \( \hat{d} \) :
-
dynamical heat transport coefficient in Eq. (39)
- d :
-
dynamical heat transport (DHT) coefficient \( \left\lfloor { \equiv \hat{d}/\left( {2\pi a^{2} } \right)} \right\rfloor\) [Eq. (40]
- dFlux/dSST:
-
rate of change with increasing SST of total (LW + SW) outgoing radiation per unit area at TOA in the tropics
- \( D \left[ { \equiv F_{E} + F_{\rm OH} } \right] \) :
-
dynamical heat transport (oceanic plus atmospheric) from Zone 1 to Zone 2
- DHT:
-
dynamical heat transport (D)
- \( \tilde{D}^{\prime} \) :
-
\( D^{\prime}/2\pi a^{2} \)
- \( \tilde{D}^{\prime}_{A} \) :
-
\( \tilde{D}^{\prime} \) for Model A
- \( \tilde{D}^{\prime}_{B} \) :
-
\( \tilde{D}^{\prime} \) for Model B
- E :
-
average heat content of the land-ocean system per unit area
- E 1,2 :
-
average heat content of the land-ocean system per unit area in Zone (1,2)
- ERBE:
-
Earth Radiation Budget Experiment
- F OH :
-
heat transport by ocean currents from Zone 1 to Zone 2
- F E :
-
transport of moist static energy by atmospheric motions from Zone 1 to Zone 2
- \( F_{\rm SFC}^{ \downarrow } \) :
-
net downward global energy flux at the surface
- \( F_{\rm TOA} {}^{ \downarrow } \) :
-
net downward global energy flux at TOA
- \( \left( {F_{\rm SFC}^{ \downarrow } } \right)_{1,2} \) :
-
value of \( F_{\rm SFC}^{ \downarrow } \) in Zone (1,2)
- \( \left( {F_{\rm TOA}^{ \downarrow } } \right)_{1,2} \) :
-
value of \( F_{\rm TOA}^{ \downarrow } \) in Zone (1,2)
- GCM:
-
general circulation model
- GHG:
-
greenhouse gas
- LCH01:
-
Lindzen et al. (2001)
- LC09:
-
Lindzen and Choi (2009)
- LC10:
-
Lindzen and Choi (2010)
- LW:
-
longwave
- OLR:
-
outgoing LW radiation (at TOA)
- PW:
-
petawatt (1015 W)
- \( Q^{\prime} \) :
-
global-mean external (perturbation) forcing per unit area
- \( Q^{\prime}_{1,2} \) :
-
global-mean external (perturbation) forcing per unit area in Zone (1,2)
- R :
-
characteristic rate of decay of an impulsively forced perturbation in the ZDM or Model A
- RH:
-
relative humidity
- R F,S :
-
fast and slow characteristic rates of decay of an impulsively forced perturbation in Model B
- S :
-
b 1 + b 2
- \( S_{1} \equiv c_{O} (R_{F} + R_{S}) \) :
-
\( b_{1} + {\text{b}}_{ 2} + 2 {\text{d }} \) [Eq. (43) and Appendix 2]
- \( S_{2} \equiv c_{O}^{2} R_{F} R_{S} \) :
-
\( b_{1} b_{2} + d(b_{1} + b_{2} ) \) [Eq. (44) and Appendix 2]
- SST:
-
sea surface temperature
- SW:
-
shortwave
- t :
-
time
- TOA:
-
top-of-the-atmosphere
- T :
-
globally averaged surface temperature [=\( \left( {T_{1} + T_{2} } \right)/2 \)]
- T 1 :
-
average surface temperature in Zone 1 (the tropics)
- T 2 :
-
average temperature in Zone 2 (the extratropics)
- ZDM:
-
zero-dimensional model
- ΔD :
-
\( D^{\prime}(\infty ) \) = equilibrium value of perturbation DHT
- \( \Updelta \tilde{D} \) :
-
\( \Updelta D/(2\pi a^{2} ) \)
- \( \Updelta \tilde{D}_{A} \) :
-
\( \Updelta \tilde{D} \) for Model A
- \( \Updelta \tilde{D}_{B} \) :
-
\( \Updelta \tilde{D} \) for Model B
- ΔQ :
-
global-mean TOA forcing per unit area in the ZDM (used as the amplitude of an impulsive or step-function forcing)
- ΔQ 1,2 :
-
mean forcing per unit area in Zone (1,2) of the two-zone models (used as the amplitude of an impulsive or step-function forcing)
- \( \left( {\Updelta Q_{1} } \right)_{C} \) :
-
critical value of ∆Q 1 separating Sensitivity Regions I and II (Fig. 2)
- ΔT :
-
equilibrium temperature increment for a step-function external forcing in the ZDM
- ΔT A :
-
equilibrium temperature increment for a step-function external forcing in Model A
- ΔT B :
-
equilibrium global-mean temperature increment for a step-function external forcing in Model B \( [\equiv\left( {\Updelta T_{1} + \Updelta T_{2} } \right)/2] \)
- ΔT 1 :
-
\( T^{\prime}_{1} (\infty ) \) (Model B)
- ΔT 2 :
-
\( T^{\prime}_{2} (\infty ) \) (Model B)
Appendix 2: Solution to Model B for impulsive forcing
To obtain the solution to the perturbation equations (41) and (42) of Model B, it is convenient to rewrite them in the form
where
These equations are of the same form as those governing the TOA models considered in B99 and B07. Their solution for the impulsive forcing (29) (see B07 for details) is
where the characteristic rates of decay, R F and R S , are given by
with
The above solution satisfies the initial condition \( \left( {T_{1}^{\prime } ,T_{2}^{\prime } } \right) = \left( {\Updelta Q_{1} ,\Updelta Q_{2} } \right)/c_{O} \) at t = 0+, and it can easily be verified by substitution that it satisfies the governing equations (70) and (71) for t > 0.
The conditions for global stability of Model B are that the real parts of RF and RS be positive. These conditions are satisfied if
and
Using (72), these criteria can be rewritten in the forms (43) and (44).
Appendix 3: Local instability in both zones implies global instability of Model B
We show here that if Model B is locally unstable in both zones (i.e., b 1 < 0 and b 2 < 0), the global stability criteria S 1 > 0 and S 2 > 0 cannot both be satisfied.
Using (43), we see that under the conditions assumed, satisfying S 1 > 0 requires
Using (44), we see that, under the same conditions, satisfying S2 > 0 requires
The inequalities (80) and (81) can be satisfied simultaneously only if
i.e., only if
It is impossible to satisfy this condition when b 1 < 0 and b 2 < 0. Thus, it is impossible to satisfy both of the stability criteria S 1 > 0 and S 2 > 0 under these conditions and the model must be globally unstable.
Appendix 4: Conditions determining the sign of ∆T B in sensitivity Regions II and III
To specify the conditions determining the sign of ∆T B in Regions II and III more precisely, we rewrite (50) in the form
where
4.1 (a) Sensitivity Region II
Here, ∆Q 1 is defined to lie in the range (58) and, as already noted, this implies ∆Q 1 + ∆Q 2 > 0. From (84) and (85) it is clear that the conditions for ∆T B > 0 are then
or
If (86) is satisfied, ∆T B > 0 throughout Region II. If (87) is satisfied, Region II is divided into two sub-regions, the crossover point between them being defined by
In the sub-region to the left, ∆T B < 0, while in the sub-region to the right, ∆T B > 0. We have already seen [from (55)] that if b 1 is assigned values approaching its lower limit for global stability (in which case \( S_{2} \to 0_{ + } \)), \( \Updelta T_{B} \to -\infty \) throughout Region II; in this case the crossover point defined by (88) approaches the right boundary of Sensitivity Region II.
4.2 (b) Sensitivity Region III
Here, ∆Q 1 is defined to lie in the range (59) and, as already noted, this implies ∆Q 1 + ∆Q 2 < 0. In this case, we see from (84) and (85) that ∆T B > 0 only if
If (89) is satisfied, ∆T B > 0 in a small sub-region of Region III adjoining its right boundary, with ∆T B < 0 elsewhere in the region. If (89) is not satisfied, ∆T B < 0 everywhere in Region III.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bates, J.R. Climate stability and sensitivity in some simple conceptual models. Clim Dyn 38, 455–473 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0966-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-010-0966-0