Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A novel method for passing cerebrospinal fluid shunt tubing: a proof of principle study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Few innovations in the method of tunneling shunt tubing for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt diversion have been made since this treatment of hydrocephalus was first developed. Therefore, this feasibility study was performed with the hope of identifying an improved technique that could potentially carry fewer complications.

Materials and methods

On 10 cadaver sides and when placed in the supine position, small skin incisions were made at the clavicle and ipsilateral subcostal region, and magnets were used to pass standard shunt tubing between the two incisions.

Results

Nickel-plated magnets were less effective in pulling the shunt tubing below the skin compared with ceramic magnets. Of these, magnets with pull strengths of 150–200 lbs were the most effective in dragging the subcutaneous tubing between the two incisions. No obvious damage to the skin from the overlying magnet was seen in any specimen.

Conclusions

Few options exist for tunneling distal shunt tubing for CSF shunt procedures. Future patient studies are needed to determine if the technique described herein is superior to current methods, particularly when examining patient groups that are at a greater risk for injury during tunneling shunt catheters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figs. 1–3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fewel ME, Garton HJ (2004) Migration of distal ventriculoperitoneal shunt catheter into the heart. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 100:206–211

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Danan D, Winfree CJ, McKhann GM 2nd (2008) Intra-abdominal vascular injury during trocar assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunting: case report. Neurosurgery 63:E613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Menguy E, Mangez JF, Roux P, Alibert F, Winckler C (1986) Pneumothorax after ventriculoperitoneal shunt procedure. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 5:615–616

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nguyen HS, Turner M, Butty SD, Cohen-Gadol AA (2010) Migration of a distal shunt catheter into the heart and pulmonary artery: report of a case and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 26:1113–1116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Oi S, Matsumoto S (1991) A shape-corrective shunt-passer using a titanium-nickel alloy. Neurosurgery 28:725–726

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Portnoy HD, Croissant PD (1973) Two unusual complications of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt: case report. J Neurosurg 39:775–776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Prabhakar H, Rath GP, Bithal PK, Chouhan RS (2005) Intracranial pressure and hemodynamic changes during the tunneling phase of ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion. Eur J Anaesthesiol 22:947–950

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rizk E, Dias MS, Verbrugge J, Boop FA (2009) Intracardiac migration of a distal shunt catheter: an unusual complication of ventricular shunts. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3:525–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruggiero C, Spennato P, De Paulis D, Aliberti F, Cinalli G (2010) Intracardiac migration of the distal catheter of ventrculoperitoneal shunt: a case report. Childs Nerv Syst 26:957–962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sandquist MA, Selden NR (2003) A single-pass tunneling technique for CSF shunting procedures. Pediatr Neurosurg 39:254–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schul DB, Wolf S, Lumenta CB (2010) Iatrogenic tension pneumothorax resulting pneumocephalus after insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt: an unusual complication. Acta Neuochir 152:143–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Solmaz I, Tehli O, Kaya S, Erdogan E, Izci Y (2011) Bilateral pneumothorax during subdural-peritoneal shunting. Turk Neurosurg 21:421–422

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tubbs RS, Salter EG, Custis JW, Wellons JC 3rd, Blount JP, Oakes WJ (2006) Surgical anatomy of the cervical and infraclavicular parts of the long thoracic nerve. J Neurosurg 104:792–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Willison CD, Kopitnik TA Jr, Kaufman HH, Tarry W, Vaughan R (1990) Posterior flank approach to the peritoneum for ventriculoperitoneal shunting. Pediatr Neurosurg 16:313–315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wong JM, Ziewacz JE, Ho AL, Panchmatia JR, Bader AM, Garton H et al (2012) Patterns in neurosurgical adverse events: cerebrospinal fluid shunt surgery. Neurosurg Focus 33:E13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron A. Cohen-Gadol.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tubbs, R.S., Goodrich, D., Tubbs, I. et al. A novel method for passing cerebrospinal fluid shunt tubing: a proof of principle study. Childs Nerv Syst 30, 2115–2117 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-014-2521-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-014-2521-5

Keywords

Navigation