Abstract
Introduction
Few innovations in the method of tunneling shunt tubing for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt diversion have been made since this treatment of hydrocephalus was first developed. Therefore, this feasibility study was performed with the hope of identifying an improved technique that could potentially carry fewer complications.
Materials and methods
On 10 cadaver sides and when placed in the supine position, small skin incisions were made at the clavicle and ipsilateral subcostal region, and magnets were used to pass standard shunt tubing between the two incisions.
Results
Nickel-plated magnets were less effective in pulling the shunt tubing below the skin compared with ceramic magnets. Of these, magnets with pull strengths of 150–200 lbs were the most effective in dragging the subcutaneous tubing between the two incisions. No obvious damage to the skin from the overlying magnet was seen in any specimen.
Conclusions
Few options exist for tunneling distal shunt tubing for CSF shunt procedures. Future patient studies are needed to determine if the technique described herein is superior to current methods, particularly when examining patient groups that are at a greater risk for injury during tunneling shunt catheters.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Fewel ME, Garton HJ (2004) Migration of distal ventriculoperitoneal shunt catheter into the heart. Case report and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 100:206–211
Danan D, Winfree CJ, McKhann GM 2nd (2008) Intra-abdominal vascular injury during trocar assisted ventriculoperitoneal shunting: case report. Neurosurgery 63:E613
Menguy E, Mangez JF, Roux P, Alibert F, Winckler C (1986) Pneumothorax after ventriculoperitoneal shunt procedure. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 5:615–616
Nguyen HS, Turner M, Butty SD, Cohen-Gadol AA (2010) Migration of a distal shunt catheter into the heart and pulmonary artery: report of a case and review of the literature. Childs Nerv Syst 26:1113–1116
Oi S, Matsumoto S (1991) A shape-corrective shunt-passer using a titanium-nickel alloy. Neurosurgery 28:725–726
Portnoy HD, Croissant PD (1973) Two unusual complications of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt: case report. J Neurosurg 39:775–776
Prabhakar H, Rath GP, Bithal PK, Chouhan RS (2005) Intracranial pressure and hemodynamic changes during the tunneling phase of ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion. Eur J Anaesthesiol 22:947–950
Rizk E, Dias MS, Verbrugge J, Boop FA (2009) Intracardiac migration of a distal shunt catheter: an unusual complication of ventricular shunts. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3:525–528
Ruggiero C, Spennato P, De Paulis D, Aliberti F, Cinalli G (2010) Intracardiac migration of the distal catheter of ventrculoperitoneal shunt: a case report. Childs Nerv Syst 26:957–962
Sandquist MA, Selden NR (2003) A single-pass tunneling technique for CSF shunting procedures. Pediatr Neurosurg 39:254–257
Schul DB, Wolf S, Lumenta CB (2010) Iatrogenic tension pneumothorax resulting pneumocephalus after insertion of a ventriculoperitoneal shunt: an unusual complication. Acta Neuochir 152:143–144
Solmaz I, Tehli O, Kaya S, Erdogan E, Izci Y (2011) Bilateral pneumothorax during subdural-peritoneal shunting. Turk Neurosurg 21:421–422
Tubbs RS, Salter EG, Custis JW, Wellons JC 3rd, Blount JP, Oakes WJ (2006) Surgical anatomy of the cervical and infraclavicular parts of the long thoracic nerve. J Neurosurg 104:792–795
Willison CD, Kopitnik TA Jr, Kaufman HH, Tarry W, Vaughan R (1990) Posterior flank approach to the peritoneum for ventriculoperitoneal shunting. Pediatr Neurosurg 16:313–315
Wong JM, Ziewacz JE, Ho AL, Panchmatia JR, Bader AM, Garton H et al (2012) Patterns in neurosurgical adverse events: cerebrospinal fluid shunt surgery. Neurosurg Focus 33:E13
Funding
None.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tubbs, R.S., Goodrich, D., Tubbs, I. et al. A novel method for passing cerebrospinal fluid shunt tubing: a proof of principle study. Childs Nerv Syst 30, 2115–2117 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-014-2521-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-014-2521-5