Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Atypical scaphocephaly: a review

  • Special Annual Issue
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and purpose

Sagittal craniosynostosis (SCS) is common and easily recognized and corrected surgically. However, rare cases of SCS are more complex: these associate closure of the metopic or delayed closure of the coronal suture, uni- or bilaterally.

Material and methods

We reviewed the available literature on atypical sagittal craniosynostosis (ASCS). We also reviewed retrospectively our series of SCS treated since 1980 and selected cases with simultaneous closure of the metopic (leptocephaly) or delayed closure of other sutures (plagiocephaly, oxycephaly, or Crouzon syndrome).

Results

ASCS is rare, representing <10 % of SCS. In our series, among 447 cases of SCS followed for a mean duration of 63.7 months, we identified 22 cases of ASCS: 6 with leptocephaly, 9 with non-syndromic oxycephaly, 4 with Crouzon syndrome, and 3 with plagiocephaly. Fourteen patients required a second operation, either planned initially (severe leptocephaly) or because of brain compression. The actuarial incidence of ASCS requiring reoperation was 5.3 % of SCS at 10 years. After a mean follow-up of 113 months, morphological results in ASCS were grade 1 (no defect) in 5, grade 2 (mild defect) in 2, grade 3 (minor reoperation) in 3, and grade 4 (major reoperation) in 12; one patient had visual impairment, and two had learning difficulties.

Conclusions

ACSC can be detected initially or occur with a delay in apparently standard SCS. Leptocephaly is a specific entity. Because of the implications on the management and risk for the patient, preoperative evaluation of patients with SCS with CT scanner and prolonged follow-up are necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agrawal D, Steinbok P, Cochrane DD (2005) Diagnosis of isolated sagittal synostosis: are radiographic studies necessary? Childs Nerv Syst 22:375–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal D, Steinbok P, Cochrane DD (2006) Reformation of the sagittal suture following surgery for isolated sagittal craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg 105(2 Suppl):115–117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnaud E, Capon-Degardin N, Michienzi J, Di Rocco F, Renier D (2009) Scaphocephaly part II: secondary coronal synostosis after scaphocephalic surgical correction. J Craniofac Surg 20(Suppl 2):1843–1850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Averbeck D (2009) Does scientific evidence support a change from the LNT model for low-dose radiation risk extrapolation? Health Phys 97:493–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berrington de González A, Darby S (2004) Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 363:345–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Captier G, Bigorre M, Rakotoarimanana JL, Leboucq N, Montoya P (2005) Étude des variations morphologiques des scaphocéphalies. Implication pour leur systématisation (Study of the morphologic variations of the scaphocephaly. Deduction for their systematisation). Ann Chir Plast Esthet 50:715–722

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Connolly JP, Gruss J, Seto ML, Whelan MF, Ellenbogen R, Weiss A, Buchman SR, Cunningham ML (2004) Progressive postnatal craniosynostosis and increased intracranial pressure. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:1313–1323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhellemmes P, Lejeune JP, Hladky JP, Gonzales R, Pellerin P (1994) Linear coagulation of the dura in the treatment of craniosynostosis. Childs Nerv Syst 10:410, abstract

    Google Scholar 

  9. Domeshek LF, Das RR, Van Aalst JA, Mukundan S Jr, Marcus JR (2011) Influence of metopic suture fusion associated with sagittal synostosis. J Craniofac Surg 22:77–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodrich JT (2004) Craniofacial reconstruction for craniosynostosis. In: Goodrich JT, Staffenberg DA (eds) Plastic techniques in neurosurgery, 2nd edn. Thieme, New York, pp 56–93

    Google Scholar 

  11. Greene CS (1998) Pancraniosynostosis after surgery for single sutural craniosynostosis. Pediatr Neurosurg 29:127–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Haas LL (1952) Roentgenological skull measurements and their diagnostic applications. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 67:197–209

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heller JB, Heller MM, Knoll B, Gabbay JS, Duncan C, Persing JA (2008) Intracranial volume and cephalic index outcomes for total calvarial reconstruction among nonsyndromic sagittal synostosis patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:187–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jane JA, Persing JA (2000) Neurosurgical treatment of craniosynostosis. In: Cohen MM, MacLean Ruth E (eds) Craniosynostosis: diagnosis, evaluation, and management. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 209–227

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nelhaus G (1968) Head circumference from birth to eighteen years. Practical composite international and interracial graphs. Pediatrics 41:106–114

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reddy K, Hoffman H, Armstrong D (1990) Delayed and progressive multiple suture craniosynostosis. Neurosurgery 26:442–448

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Renier D, El Ghouzi V, Bonaventure J, Le Merrer M, Lajeunie E (2000) Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 mutation in nonsyndromic coronal synostosis: clinical spectrum, prevalence, and surgical outcome. J Neurosurg 92:631–636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Seto ML, Hing AV, Chang J, Hu M, Kapp-Simon KA, Patel PK, Burton BK, Kane AA, Smyth MD, Hopper R, Ellenbogen RG, Stevenson K, Speltz ML, Cunningham ML (2007) Isolated sagittal and coronal craniosynostosis associated with TWIST box mutations. Am J Med Genet A 143:678–686

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shin JH, Persing JA (2002) Sagittal synostosis. In: Lin KY, Ogle RC, Jane JA (eds) Craniofacial surgery: science and surgical technique. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 225–232

    Google Scholar 

  20. Terner JS, Travieso R, Lee SS, Forte AJ, Patel A, Persing JA (2011) Combined metopic and sagittal craniosynostosis: is it worse than sagittal synostosis alone? Neurosurg Focus 31(2):E2. doi:10.3171/2011.6.FOCUS11100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vu HL, Panchal J, Parker EE, Levine NS, Francel P (2001) The timing of physiologic closure of the metopic suture: a review of 159 patients using reconstructed 3D CT scans of the craniofacial region. J Craniofac Surg 12:527–532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Whitaker LA, Bartlett SP, Schut L, Bruce D (1987) Craniosynostosis: an analysis of the timing, treatment, and complications in 164 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 80:195–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthieu Vinchon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vinchon, M., Pellerin, P., Guerreschi, P. et al. Atypical scaphocephaly: a review. Childs Nerv Syst 28, 1319–1325 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1807-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1807-8

Keywords

Navigation