Abstract
In this study, the predictability of the El Niño-South Oscillation (ENSO) in an operational prediction model from the perspective of initial errors is diagnosed using the seasonal hindcasts of the Beijing Climate Center System Model, BCC_CSM1.1(m). Forecast skills during the different ENSO phases are analyzed and it is shown that the ENSO forecasts appear to be more challenging during the developing phase, compared to the decay phase. During ENSO development, the SST prediction errors are significantly negative and cover a large area in the central and eastern tropical Pacific, thus limiting the model skill in predicting the intensity of El Niño. The large-scale SST errors, at their early stage, are generated gradually in terms of negative anomalies in the subsurface ocean temperature over the central-western equatorial Pacific, featuring an error evolutionary process similar to that of El Niño decay and the transition to the La Niña growth phase. Meanwhile, for short lead-time ENSO predictions, the initial wind errors begin to play an increasing role, particularly in linking with the subsurface heat content errors in the central-western Pacific. By comparing the multiple samples of initial fields in the model, it is clearly found that poor SST predictions of the Niño-3.4 region are largely due to contributions of the initial errors in certain specific locations in the tropical Pacific. This demonstrates that those sensitive areas for initial fields in ENSO prediction are fairly consistent in both previous ideal experiments and our operational predictions, indicating the need for targeted observations to further improve operational forecasts of ENSO.
摘要
本文基于国家气候中心气候预测模式BCC_CSM1.1(m),从初始误差增长的角度探讨了厄尔尼诺-南方涛动(ENSO)的可预测性问题。考察了ENSO发展和衰减位相的预测表现,结果指出相比于ENSO衰减位相,模式对ENSO发展位相的预测技巧更低,此时赤道中东太平洋海表温度呈现大范围的“冷”预报偏差。误差诊断表明上述“冷”偏差源于初始时刻赤道中西太平洋次表层的海温负异常,其误差演变类似于一次厄尔尼诺衰减、随后拉尼娜发展的过程。同时,对于超前6个月及以下的ENSO预测,风场的初始误差影响出现,并与赤道中西太平洋的次表层热含量误差紧密相连。通过对模式多初始样本的比较分析,进一步揭示了Niño-3.4海区海温预测较差的主要原因是热带太平洋特定位置存在的初始误差。无论是前人的理想模型,还是本文的业务模式,ENSO预测对应的初始敏感区基本一致,因此,本文可为通过优化目标观测来进一步改善ENSO的业务预测提供科学指导。
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnston, A. G., M. K. Tippett, M. L. L’Heureux, S. H. Li, and D. G. DeWitt, 2012: Skill of real-time seasonal ENSO model predictions during 2002–11: Is our capability increasing. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 631–651, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00111.1.
Behringer, D. W., M. Ji, and A. Leetmaa, 1998: An improved coupled model for ENSO prediction and implications for ocean initialization. Part I: The ocean data assimilation system. Mon. Wea. Rev., 126, 1013–1021, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1998)126<1013:AICMFE>2.0.CO;2.
Chang, P., and Coauthors, 2007: Pacific meridional mode and El Niño-Southern Oscillation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L16608, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030302.
Chen, D. K., and M. A. Cane, 2008: El Niño prediction and predictability. J. Comput. Phys., 227, 3625–3640, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2007.05.014.
Chen, D. K., S. E. Zebiak, A. J. Busalacchi, and M. A. Cane, 1995: An improved procedure for El Niño forecasting: Implications for predictability. Science, 269, 1699–1702, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.269.5231.1699.
Chen, D. K., M. A. Cane, A. Kaplan, S. E. Zebiak, and D. J. Huang, 2004: Predictability of El Niño over the past 148 years. Nature, 428, 733–736, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02439.
Chen, D. K., and Coauthors, 2015: Strong influence of westerly wind bursts on El Niño diversity. Nature Geoscience, 8, 339–345, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2399.
D’Andrea, F., and R. Vautard, 2000: Reducing systematic errors by empirically correcting model errors. Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography, 52, 21–41, https://doi.org/10.3402/tellusa.v52i1.12251.
Duan, W. S., and J. Y. Hu, 2016: The initial errors that induce a significant “spring predictability barrier” for El Niño events and their implications for target observation: results from an earth system model. Climate Dyn., 46, 3599–3615, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2789-5.
Duan, W. S., X. C. Liu, K. Y. Zhu, and M. Mu, 2009: Exploring the initial errors that cause a significant “spring predictability barrier” for El Niño events. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 114, C04022, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008JC004925.
Fang, X. H., and M. Mu, 2018: Both air-sea components are crucial for El Niño forecast from boreal spring. Scientific Reports, 8, 10501, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-28964-z.
Fang, X. H., F. Zheng, Z. Y. Liu, and J. Zhu, 2019: Decadal modulation of ENSO spring persistence barrier by thermal damping processes in the observation. Geophys. Res. Lett., 46, 6892–6899, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL082921.
Feng, J., L. Wang, W. Chen, S. K. Fong, and K. C. Leong, 2010: Different impacts of two types of Pacific Ocean warming on Southeast Asian rainfall during boreal winter. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 115, D24122, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010JD014761.
Ham, Y.-G., J.-S. Kug, J.-Y. Park, and F.-F. Jin, 2013: Sea surface temperature in the north tropical Atlantic as a trigger for El Niño/Southern Oscillation events. Nature Geoscience, 6, 112–116, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo1686.
Horii, T., I. Ueki, and K. Hanawa, 2012: Breakdown of ENSO predictors in the 2000s: Decadal changes of recharge/discharge-SST phase relation and atmospheric intraseasonal forcing. Geophys. Res. Lett., 39, L10707, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051740.
Izumo, T., and Coauthors, 2010: Influence of the state of the Indian Ocean Dipole on the following year’s El Niño. Nature Geoscience, 93, 168–172, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo760.
Jin, E. K., and Coauthors, 2008: Current status of ENSO prediction skill in coupled ocean—atmosphere models. Climate Dyn., 31, 647–664, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-008-0397-3.
Kanamitsu, M., W. Ebisuzaki, J. Woollen, S. K. Yang, J. J. Hnilo, M. Fiorino, and G. L. Potter, 2002: NCEP-DOE AMIP-II Reanalysis (R-2). Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 83, 1631–1644, https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-83-11-1631.
Kirtman, B. P., J. Shukla, M. Balmaseda, N. Graham, C. Penland, Y. Xue, and S. Zebiak, 2002: Current status of ENSO forecast skill. A report to the Climate Variability and Predictability (CLIVAR) Numerical Experimentation Group (NEG), CLIVAR Working Group on Seasonal to Interannual Prediction, 14pp. [Available online at http://www.clivar.org/publications/wgreports/wgsip/nino3/report.htm.]
Latif, M., T. P. Barnett, M. A. Cane, M. Flügel, N. E. Graham, H. Von Storch, J. S. Xu, and S. E. Zebiak, 1994: A review of ENSO prediction studies. Climate Dyn., 9, 167–179, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00208250.
Latif, M., and Coauthors, 1998: A review of the predictability and prediction of ENSO. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 103, 14375–14393, https://doi.org/10.1029/97JC03413.
Liu, X. W., T. W. Wu, S. Yang, W. H. Jie, S. P. Nie, Q. P. Li, Y. J. Cheng, and X. Y. Liang, 2015: Performance of the seasonal forecasting of the Asian summer monsoon by BCC_CSM1. 1(m). Adv. Atmos. Sci., 32, 1156–1172, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-015-4194-8.
Liu, Y., and H. L. Ren, 2017: Improving ENSO prediction in CFSv2 with an analogue-based correction method. International Journal of Climatology, 37, 5035–5046, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5142.
Lopez, H., and B. P. Kirtman, 2014: WWBs, ENSO predictability, the spring barrier and extreme events. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 119, 10114–10138, https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021908.
Luo, J. J., S. Masson, S. Behera, S. Shingu, and T. Yamagata, 2005: Seasonal climate predictability in a coupled OAGCM using a different approach for ensemble forecasts. J. Climate, 18, 4474–4497, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI3526.1.
McPhaden, M. J., 2003: Tropical Pacific Ocean heat content variations and ENSO persistence barriers. Geophys. Res. Lett., 30, 1480, https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL016872.
McPhaden, M. J., 2012: A 21st century shift in the relationship between ENSO SST and warm water volume anomalies. Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L09706, https://doi.org/10.1029/2012GL051826.
Moore, A. M., and R. Kleeman, 1996: The dynamics of error growth and predictability in a coupled model of ENSO. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 122, 1405–1446, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712253409.
Mu, M., 2013: Methods, current status, and prospect of targeted observation. Science China Earth Sciences, 56, 1997–2005, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-013-4727-x.
Mu, M., H. Xu, and W. S. Duan, 2007: A kind of initial errors related to “spring predictability barrier” for El Niño events in Zebiak-Cane model. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34, L03709, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GL027412.
Rayner, N. A., D. E. Parker, E. B. Horton, C. K. Folland, L. V. Alexander, D. P. Rowell, E. C. Kent, and A. Kaplan, 2003: Global analyses of sea surface temperature, sea ice, and night marine air temperature since the late nineteenth century. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 108, 4407, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002670.
Ren, H. L., 2008a: Relationships between prediction errors and physical predictors in dynamical seasonal prediction. Journal of Applied Meteorological Science, 19, 276–286, https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2008.03.003. (in Chinese with English abstract)
Ren, H. L., 2008b: Predictor-based error correction method in short-term climate prediction. Progress in Natural Science, 18, 129–135, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnsc.2007.08.003.
Ren, H. L., and F. F. Jin, 2011: Niño indices for two types of ENSO. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L04704, https://doi.org/10.1029/2010GL046031.
Ren, H. L., and F. F. Jin, 2013: Recharge oscillator mechanisms in two types of ENSO. J. Climate, 26, 6506–6523, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00601.1.
Ren, H.-L., F.-F. Jin, B. Tian, and A. A. Scaife, 2016: Distinct persistence barriers in two types of ENSO. Geophys. Res. Lett., 43, 10973–10979, https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL071015.
Ren, H. L., Y. Liu, F. F. Jin, Y. P. Yan, and X. W. Liu, 2014: Application of the analogue-based correction of errors method in ENSO prediction. Atmospheric and Oceanic Science Letters, 7, 157–161, https://doi.org/10.1080/16742834.2014.11447152.
Ren, H. L., B. Lu, J. H. Wan, B. Tian, and P. Q. Zhang, 2018: Identification standard for ENSO events and its application to climate monitoring and prediction in China. J. Meteor. Res., 32, 923–936, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-018-8078-6.
Snyder, C., 1996: Summary of an informal workshop on adaptive observations and FASTEX. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 77, 953–961, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0477-77.5.953.
Tian, B., and W. S. Duan, 2016: Comparison of the initial errors most likely to cause a spring predictability barrier for two types of El Niño events. Climate Dyn., 47, 779–792, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-015-2870-0.
Tian, B., H.-L. Ren, F.-F. Jin, and M. F. Stuecker, 2019: Diagnosing the representation and causes of the ENSO persistence barrier in CMIP5 simulations. Climate Dyn., 53, 2147–2160, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04810-4.
Timmermann, A., and Coauthors, 2018: El Niño-Southern Oscillation complexity. Nature, 559, 535–545, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0252-6.
Torrence, C., and P. J. Webster, 1998: The annual cycle of persistence in the El Niño/Southern Oscillation. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 124, 1985–2004, https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712455010.
Vimont, D. J., J. M. Wallace, and D. S. Battisti, 2003: The seasonal footprinting mechanism in the Pacific: Implications for ENSO. J. Climate, 16, 2668–2675, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0442(2003)016<2668:TSFMIT>2.0.CO;2.
Webster, P. J., 1995: The annual cycle and the predictability of the tropical coupled ocean-atmosphere system. Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 56, 33–55, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01022520.
Weng, H. Y., K. Ashok, S. K. Behera, S. A. Rao, and T. Yamagata, 2007: Impacts of recent El Niño Modoki on dry/wet conditions in the Pacific rim during boreal summer. Climate Dyn., 29, 113–129, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-007-0234-0.
Wu, R. G., B. P. Kirtman, and H. van den Dool, 2009: An analysis of ENSO prediction skill in the CFS retrospective forecasts. J. Climate, 22, 1801–1818, https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JCLI2565.1.
Wu, T. W., and Coauthors, 2013: Global carbon budgets simulated by the Beijing Climate Center Climate System Model for the last century. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 118, 4326–4347, https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrd.50320.
Xue, Y., M. A. Cane, and S. E. Zebiak, 1997: Predictability of a coupled model of ENSO using singular vector analysis. Part I: optimal growth in seasonal background and ENSO cycles. Mon. Wea. Rev., 125, 2043–2056, https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1997)125<2043:POACMO>2.0.CO;2.
Yang, S., and X. W. Jiang, 2014: Prediction of Eastern and Central Pacific ENSO events and their impacts on East Asian climate by the NCEP climate forecast system. J. Climate, 27, 4451–4472, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-13-00471.1.
Yang, Z. Y., X. H. Fang, and M. Mu, 2020: The optimal precursor of El Niño in the GFDL CM2p1 Model. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 125, e2019JC015797, https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JC015797.
Yu, J.-Y., and H.-Y. Kao, 2007: Decadal changes of ENSO persistence barrier in SST and ocean heat content indices: 1958–2001. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos., 112, D13106, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007654.
Yu, Y. S., M. Mu, W. S. Duan, and T. T. Gong, 2012: Contribution of the location and spatial pattern of initial error to uncertainties in El Niño predictions. J. Geophys. Res.: Oceans, 117, C06018, https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JC007758.
Zhang, J., W. S. Duan, and X. F. Zhi, 2015: Using CMIP5 model outputs to investigate the initial errors that cause the “spring predictability barrier” for El Niño events. Science China Earth Sciences, 58, 685–696, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-014-4994-1.
Zhang, W. J., H. Y. Li, M. F. Stuecker, F.-F. Jin, and A. G. Turner, 2016: A new understanding of El Niño’s impact over East Asia: Dominance of the ENSO combination mode. J. Climate, 29, 4347–4359, https://doi.org/10.1175/JCLI-D-15-0104.1.
Zheng, F., and J. Zhu, 2010: Spring predictability barrier of ENSO events from the perspective of an ensemble prediction system. Global and Planetary Change, 72, 108–117, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2010.01.021.
Zheng, Z. H., Z. Z. Hu, and M. L’Heureux, 2016: Predictable components of ENSO evolution in real-time multi-model predictions. Scientific Reports, 6, 35909, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep35909.
Zhu, J. S., A. Kumar, and B. H. Huang, 2015: The relationship between thermocline depth and SST anomalies in the eastern equatorial Pacific: Seasonality and decadal variations. Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 4507–4515, https://doi.org/10.1002/2015GL064220.
Acknowledgements
This work was jointly supported by the National Key Research and Development Program on Monitoring, Early Warning, and Prevention of Major Natural Disaster (Grant No. 2018YFC1506000), and the China National Science Foundation project (Grant No. 41606019, 41975094, and 41706016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Article Highlights
• The forecasts tend to be more challenging during the developing year of ENSO, largely due to contributions of the initial errors in some specific locations.
• The sensitive areas for initial fields in ENSO prediction are fairly consistent in both previous ideal experiments and our operational predictions.
• Results here indicate implications for targeted observations to further improve operational forecasts of ENSO.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tian, B., Ren, HL. Diagnosing SST Error Growth during ENSO Developing Phase in the BCC_CSM1.1(m) Prediction System. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 39, 427–442 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1189-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-021-1189-5