Abstract
Active echolocation enables bats to orient and hunt the night sky for insects. As a counter-measure against the severe predation pressure many nocturnal insects have evolved ears sensitive to ultrasonic bat calls. In moths bat-detection was the principal purpose of hearing, as evidenced by comparable hearing physiology with best sensitivity in the bat echolocation range, 20–60 kHz, across moths in spite of diverse ear morphology. Some eared moths subsequently developed sound-producing organs to warn/startle/jam attacking bats and/or to communicate intraspecifically with sound. Not only the sounds for interaction with bats, but also mating signals are within the frequency range where bats echolocate, indicating that sound communication developed after hearing by “sensory exploitation”. Recent findings on moth sound communication reveal that close-range (~ a few cm) communication with low-intensity ultrasounds “whispered” by males during courtship is not uncommon, contrary to the general notion of moths predominantly being silent. Sexual sound communication in moths may apply to many eared moths, perhaps even a majority. The low intensities and high frequencies explain that this was overlooked, revealing a bias towards what humans can sense, when studying (acoustic) communication in animals.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acharya L, Fenton MB (1992) Echolocation behaviour of vespertilionid bats (Lasiurus cinereus and Lasiurus borealis) attacking airborne targets including arctiid moths. Can J Zool 70:1292–1298
Alem S, Koselj K, Siemers BM, Greenfield MD (2011) Bat predation and the evolution of leks in acoustic moths. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 65:2105–2116
Bailey WJ (1978) Resonant wing systems in the Australian whistling moth Hecatesia (Agarasidae, Lepidoptera). Nature 272:444–446
Belwood JJ, Morris GK (1987) Bat predation and its influence on calling behavior in neotropical katydids. Science 238:64–67
Blest AD, Collett TS, Pye JD (1963) The generation of ultrasonic signals by a New World arctiid moth. Proc R Soc B 158:196–207
Conner WE (1999) ‘Un chant d’appel amoureux’: acoustic communication in moths. J Exp Biol 202:1711–1723
Conner WE (2014) Adaptive sounds and silences: acoustic anti-predator strategies in insects. In: Hedwig B (ed) Insect hearing and acoustic communication, vol 1., Animal signals and communicationSpringer, Berlin, pp 65–79
Conner WE, Corcoran AJ (2012) Sound strategies: the 65-million-year-old battle between bats and insects. Annu Rev Entomol 57:21–39
Corcoran AJ, Conner WE (2012) Sonar jamming in the field: effectiveness and behavior of a unique prey defense. J Exp Biol 215:4278–4287
Corcoran AJ, Hristov NI (2014) Convergent evolution of anti-bat sounds. J Comp Physiol A 200:811–821
Corcoran AJ, Barber JR, Conner WE (2009) Tiger moth jams bat sonar. Science 325:325–327
Corcoran AJ, Conner WE, Barber JR (2010) Anti-bat tiger moth sounds: form and function. Curr Zool 56:358–369
Endler JA, Basolo AL (1998) Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trend Ecol Evol 13:415–420
Fullard JH (1998) The sensory coevolution of moths and bats. In: Hoy RR, Popper AN, Fay RR (eds) Comparative hearing: insects, vol 10., Springer handbook of auditory researchSpringer, New York, pp 279–326
Fullard JH (2001) Auditory sensitivity of Hawaiian moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and selective predation by the Hawaiian hoary bat (Chiroptera: Lasiurus cinereus semotus). Proc R Soc B 268:1375–1380
Fullard JH, Yack JE (1993) The evolutionary biology of insect hearing. Trend Ecol Evol 8:248–252
Fullard JH, Fenton MB, Simmons JA (1979) Jamming bat echolocation: the clicks of arctiid moths. Can J Zool 57:647–649
Fullard JH, Dawson JW, Otero LD, Surlykke A (1997) Bat-deafness in day-flying moths (Lepidoptera, Notodontidae, Dioptinae). J Comput Physiol A 181:477–483
Fullard JH, Ratcliffe JM, ter Hofstede HM (2007a) Neural evolution in the bat-free habitat of Tahiti: partial regression in an anti-predator auditory system. Biol Lett 3:26–28
Fullard JH, Ratcliffe JM, Christie CG (2007b) Acoustic feature recognition in the dogbane tiger moth, Cycnia tenera. J Exp Biol 210:2481–2488
Gerhardt HC, Huber F (2002) Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Göpfert MC, Surlykke A, Wasserthal LT (2002) Tympanal and atympanal “mouth–ears” in hawkmoths (Sphingidae). Proc R Soc B 269:89–95
Greenfield MD (2014) Acoustic communication in the nocturnal Lepidoptera. In: Hedwig B (ed) Insect hearing and acoustic communication, vol 1., Animal signals and communicationSpringer, Berlin, pp 81–100
Greenfield MD, Hohendorf H (2009) Independence of sexual and anti-predator perceptual functions in an acoustic moth: implications for the receiver biasmechanism in signal evolution. Ethology 115:1137–1149
Greenfield MD, Weber T (2000) Evolution of ultrasonic signalling in wax moths: discrimination of ultrasonic mating calls from bat echolocation signals and the exploitation of an antipredator receiver bias by sexual advertisement. Ethol Ecol Evol 12:259–279
Gwynne DT, Edwards ED (1986) Ultrasound production by genital stridulation in Syntonarcha iriastis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): long-distance signalling by male moths? Zool J Linn Soc 88:363–376
Hedwig B, Robert D (2014) Auditory parasitoid flies exploiting acoustic communication of insects. In: Hedwig B (ed) Insect hearing and acoustic communication, vol 1., Animal signals and communicationSpringer, Berlin, pp 45–63
Kindl J, Kalinová B, Červenka M, Jílek M, Valterova I (2011) Male moth songs tempt females to accept mating: the role of acoustic and pheromonal communication in the reproductive behaviour of Aphomia sociella. PLoS One 6:e26476
Miller LA, Surlykke A (2001) How some insects detect and avoid being eaten by bats: tactics and countertactics of prey and predator. Bioscience 51:570–581
Minet J, Surlykke A (2003) Auditory and sound producing organs. In: Kristensen NP (ed) Lepidoptera, moths and butterflies, vol 2., Morphology and physiologyWalter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp 289–323
Nakano R, Ishikawa Y, Tatsuki S, Surlykke A, Skals N, Takanashi T (2006) Ultrasonic courtship song in the Asian corn borer moth, Ostrinia furnacalis. Naturwissenschaften 93:292–296
Nakano R, Skals N, Takanashi T, Surlykke A, Koike T, Yoshida K, Maruyama H, Tatsuki S, Ishikawa Y (2008) Moths produce extremely quiet ultrasonic courtship songs by rubbing specialized scales. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:11812–11817
Nakano R, Ishikawa Y, Tatsuki S, Skals N, Surlykke A, Takanashi T (2009a) Private ultrasonic whispering in moths. Commun Integr Biol 2:123–126
Nakano R, Takanashi T, Fujii T, Skals N, Surlykke A, Ishikawa Y (2009b) Moths are not silent, but whisper ultrasonic courtship songs. J Exp Biol 212:4072–4078
Nakano R, Takanashi T, Skals N, Surlykke A, Ishikawa Y (2010) To females of a noctuid moth, male courtship songs are nothing more than bat echolocation calls. Biol Lett 6:582–584
Nakano R, Takanashi T, Ihara F, Mishiro K, Toyama M, Ishikawa Y (2012a) Ultrasonic courtship song of the yellow peach moth, Conogethes punctiferalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Appl Entomol Zool 47:87–93
Nakano R, Ihara F, Mishiro K, Toyama M (2012b) Male courtship ultrasound produced by mesothoracic tymbal organs in the yellow peach moth Conogethes punctiferalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Appl Entomol Zool 47:129–135
Nakano R, Takanashi T, Surlykke A, Skals N, Ishikawa Y (2013) Evolution of deceptive and true courtship songs in moths. Sci Rep 3:2003
Nakano R, Ihara F, Mishiro K, Toyama M, Toda S (2014) Double meaning of courtship song in a moth. Proc R Soc B 281:20140840
Obara Y (1979) Bombyx mori mating dance: an essential in locating the female. Appl Entomol Zool 14:130–132
Ratcliffe JM, Fullard JH, Arthur BJ, Hoy RR (2009) Tiger moths and the threat of bats: decision-making based on the activity of a single sensory neuron. Biol Lett 5:368–371
Rodríguez RL, Greenfield MD (2004) Behavioural context regulates dual function of ultrasonic hearing in lesser wax moths: bat avoidance and pair formation. Physiol Entomol 29:159–168
Roeder KD (1974) Acoustic sensory responses and possible bat-evasion tactics of certain moths. In: Burt MDB (ed) Proceedings of the Canadian society of zoologists annual meeting. University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, pp 71–78
Ryan MJ (1998) Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. Science 281:1999–2003
Ryan MJ, Phelps SM, Rand AS (2001) How evolutionary history shapes recognition mechanisms. Trend Cogn Sci 5:143–148
Rydell J, Skals N, Surlykke A, Svensson M (1997) Hearing and bat defence in geometrid winter moths. Proc R Soc B 264:83–88
Sanderford MV, Coro F, Conner WE (1998) Courtship behavior in Empyreuma affinis Roths. (Lepidoptera, Arctiidae, Ctenuchinae): acoustic signals and tympanic organ response. Naturwissenschaften 85:82–87
Schlyter F (1992) Sampling range, attraction range, and effective attraction radius: estimates of trap efficiency and communication distance in coleopteran pheromone and host attractant systems. J Appl Entomol 114:439–454
Schnitzler H-U, Kalko EKV (2001) Echolocation by insect-eating bats. Bioscience 51:557–569
Schnitzler H-U, Moss CF, Denzinger A (2003) From spatial orientation to food acquisition in echolocating bats. Trend Ecol Evol 18:386–394
Siemers BM, Kriner E, Kaipf I, Simon M, Greif S (2012) Bats eavesdrop on the sound of copulating flies. Curr Biol 22:R563–R564
Skals N, Surlykke A (1999) Sound production by abdominal tymbal organs in two moth species: the green silver-line and the scarce silver-line (Noctuoidea: Nolidae: Chloephorinae). J Exp Biol 202:2937–2949
Spangler HG (1985) Sound production and communication by the greater wax moth (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 78:54–61
Spangler HG (1988) Moth hearing, defense, and communication. Annu Rev Entomol 33:59–81
Spangler HG, Greenfield MD, Takessian A (1984) Ultrasonic mate calling in the lesser wax moth. Physiol Entomol 9:87–95
Stoneman MG, Fenton MB (1988) Disrupting foraging bats: the clicks of arctiid moths. In: Nachtigall PE, Moore PWB (eds) Animal sonar., Processes and performancePlenum Press, New York, pp 635–638
Surlykke A (1986) Moth hearing on the Faeroe Islands, an area without bats. Physiol Entomol 11:221–225
Surlykke A, Fullard JH (1989) Hearing of the Australian whistling moth, Hecatesia thyridion. Naturwissenschaften 76:132–134
Surlykke A, Gogala M (1986) Stridulation and hearing in the noctuid moth Thecophora fovea (Tr.). J Comp Physiol A 159:267–273
Surlykke A, Kalko EKV (2008) Echolocating bats cry out loud to detect their prey. PLoS One 3:e2036
Surlykke A, Miller LA (1985) The influence of arctiid moth clicks on bat echolocation; jamming or warning? J Comp Physiol A 156:831–843
Surlykke A, Filskov M, Fullard JH, Forrest E (1999) Auditory relationships to size in noctuid moths: bigger is better. Naturwissenschaften 86:238–241
Surlykke A, Yack JE, Spence AJ, Hasenfuss I (2003) Hearing in hooktip moths (Drepanidae: Lepidoptera). J Exp Biol 206:2653–2663
Takanashi T, Nakano R, Surlykke A, Tatsuta H, Tabata J, Ishikawa Y, Skals N (2010) Variation in courtship ultrasounds of three Ostrinia moths with different sex pheromones. PLoS One 5:e13144
ter Hofstede HM, Ratcliffe JM, Fullard JH (2008) Nocturnal activity positively correlated with auditory sensitivity in noctuoid moths. Biol Lett 4:262–265
ter Hofstede HM, Goerlitz HR, Montealegre ZF, Robert D, Holderied MW (2011) Tympanal mechanics and neural responses in the ears of a noctuid moth. Naturwissenschaften 98:1057–1061
ter Hofstede HM, Goerlitz HR, Ratcliffe JM, Holderied MW, Surlykke A (2013) The simple ears of noctuoid moths are tuned to the calls of their sympatric bat community. J Exp Biol 216:3954–3962
van Staaden MJ, Römer H (1998) Evolutionary transition from stretch to hearing organs in ancient grasshoppers. Nature 394:773–776
Zuk M, Kolluru GR (1998) Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. Q Rev Biol 75:415–438
Zuk M, Rotenberry JT, Tinghitella RM (2006) Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets. Biol Lett 2:521–524
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakano, R., Takanashi, T. & Surlykke, A. Moth hearing and sound communication. J Comp Physiol A 201, 111–121 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-014-0945-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-014-0945-8