Abstract
Several strategies have evolved in the vertebrate lineage to facilitate signal transmission in vocal communication. Here, I present a mechanism to facilitate signal transmission in a group of communicating common squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus sciureus). Vocal onsets of a conspecific affect call initiation in all other members of the group in less than 100 ms. The probability of vocal onsets in a range of 100 ms after the beginning of a vocalization of another monkey was significantly decreased compared to the mean probability of call onsets. Additionally, the probability for vocal onsets of conspecifics was significantly increased just a few hundreds of milliseconds after call onset of others. These behavioral data suggest neural mechanisms that suppress vocal output just after the onset of environmental noise, such as vocalizations of conspecifics, and increase the probability of call initiation of group mates shortly after. These findings add new audio–vocal behaviors to the known strategies that modulate signal transmission in vocal communication. The present study will guide future neurobiological studies that explore how the observed audio–vocal behaviors are implemented in the monkey brain.
References
Backhaus K, Erichson B, Plinke W, Weiber R (2011) Multivariate Analysemethoden. Springer, Berlin
Baldwin JD (1968) The social behavior of adult male squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) in a semi-natural environment. Folia Primatol 9:281–314
Brumm H (2006) Signaling through acoustic windows: nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short-term adjustment of song timing. J Comp Physiol A 192:1279–1285
Brumm H, Slabbekoorn H (2005) Acoustic communication in noise. Adv Stud Behav 35:151–209
Brumm H, Todt D (2002) Noise-dependent song amplitude regulation in a territorial songbird. Anim Behav 63:891–897
Brumm H, Zollinger SA (2011) The evolution of the Lombard effect: 100 years of psychoacoustic research. Behaviour 148:1173–1198
Brumm H, Voss K, Köllmer I, Todt D (2004) Acoustic communication in noise: regulation of call characteristics in a new world monkey. J Exp Biol 207:443–448
Cynx J, Lewis R, Tavel B, Tse H (1998) Amplitude regulation of vocalizations in noise by a songbird, Taeniopygia guttata. Anim Behav 56:107–113
Grohrock P, Häusler U, Jürgens U (1997) Dual-channel telemetry system for recording vocalization-correlated neuronal activity in freely moving squirrel monkeys. J Neurosci Methods 76:7–13
Hage SR, Jürgens U (2006) On the role of the pontine brainstem in vocal pattern generation. A telemetric single-unit recording study in the squirrel monkey. J Neurosci 26:7105–7115
Hage SR, Jürgens U, Ehret G (2006) Audio–vocal interaction in the pontine brainstem during self-initiated vocalization in the squirrel monkey. Eur J Neurosci 23:3297–3308
Hage SR, Jiang T, Berquist S, Feng J, Metzner W (2013) Ambient noise induces independent shifts in call frequency and amplitude within the Lombard effect in echolocating bats. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 110:4063–4068
Jürgens U (1979) Vocalization as an emotional indicator. A neuroethological study in the squirrel monkey. Behaviour 69:88–117
Jürgens U (2002) Neural pathways underlying vocal control. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 26:235–258
Jürgens U, Hage SR (2006) Telemetric recording of neuronal activity. Methods 38:195–201
Jürgens U, Hage SR (2007) On the role of the reticular formation in vocal pattern generation. Behav Brain Res 182:308–314
Kobayasi KI, Okanoya K (2003) Context-dependent song amplitude control in Bengalese finches. NeuroReport 14:521–524
Larson CR, Kistler MK (1984) Periaqueductal gray neuronal activity associated with laryngeal EMG and vocalization in the awake monkey. Neurosci Lett 46:261–266
Lombard E (1911) Le signe de l’élévation de la voix. Ann Mal Oreille Larynx 37:101–119
Masataka N, Biben M (1987) Temporal rules regulating affiliative vocal exchanges of squirrel monkeys. Behaviour 101:311–319
Metzner W (1996) Anatomical basis for audio–vocal integration in echolocating horseshoe bats. J Comp Neurol 368:252–269
Miller CT, Wang X (2006) Sensory–motor interactions modulate a primate vocal behavior: antiphonal calling in common marmosets. J Comp Physiol A 192:27–38
Miller CT, Beck K, Meade B, Wang X (2009) Antiphonal call timing in marmosets is behaviorally significant: interactive playback experiments. J Comp Physiol A 195:783–789
Nonaka S, Takahashi R, Enomoto K, Katada A, Unno T (1997) Lombard reflex during PAG-induced vocalization in decerebrate cats. Neurosci Res 29:283–289
Roy S, Miller CT, Gottsch D, Wang X (2011) Vocal control by the common marmoset in the presence of interfering noise. J Exp Biol 214:3619–3629
Schwartz JJ, Wells KD (1983) An experimental study of the acoustic interference between two species of Neotropical tree frogs. Anim Behav 31:891–897
Sinnott JM, Stebbins WC, Moody DB (1975) Regulation of voice amplitude by the monkey. J Acoust Soc Am 58:412–414
Suga N, Schlegel P (1972) Neural attenuation of responses to emitted sounds in echolocating bats. Science 177:82–84
Suga N, Shimozawa T (1974) Site of neural attenuation of responses to self-vocalized sounds in echolocating bat. Science 183:1211–1213
Winter P, Ploog D, Latta J (1966) Vocal repertoire of the squirrel monkey (Saimiri sciureus), its analysis and significance. Exp Brain Res 50:359–366
Acknowledgments
I thank Uwe Jürgens and two anonymous referees for their helpful comments on this manuscript. Furthermore, I thank Kurt Hammerschmidt for his helpful advice on statistical methods and Simon N. Jacob for proof reading. All research described here was approved by the Animals Ethics Committee of the District Government Braunschweig, Lower Saxony, Germany. The experiments conformed to the NIH guidelines on the ethical use of animals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hage, S.R. Audio–vocal interactions during vocal communication in squirrel monkeys and their neurobiological implications. J Comp Physiol A 199, 663–668 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-013-0810-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-013-0810-1