Abstract
To understand the functioning of nervous systems and, in particular, how they control behaviour we must bridge many levels of complexity from molecules, cells and synapses to perception behaviour. Although experimental analysis is a precondition for understanding by nervous systems, it is in no way sufficient. The understanding is aided at all levels of complexity by modelling. Modelling proved to be an inevitable tool to test the experimentally established hypotheses. In this review it will by exemplified by three case studies that the appropriate level of modelling needs to be adjusted to the particular computational problems that are to be solved. (1) Specific features of the highly virtuosic pursuit behaviour of male flies can be understood on the basis of a phenomenological model that relates the visual input to the motor output. (2) The processing of retinal image motion as is experienced by freely moving animals can be understood on the basis of a model consisting of algorithmic components and components which represent a simple equivalent circuit of nerve cells. (3) Behaviourally relevant features of the reliability of encoding of visual motion information can be understood by modelling the transformation of postsynaptic potentials into sequences of spike trains.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bains S (1999) A machine with a fly's-eye view. Science 285:1472
Barberini CL, Horwitz GD, Newsome WT (2000) A comparison of spiking statistics in motion sensing neurons of flies and monkeys. In: Zanker JM, Zeil J (eds) Computational, neural and ecological constraints of visual motion processing. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York
Boeddeker N, Kern R, Egelhaaf M (2003) Chasing a dummy target: smooth pursuit and velocity control in male blowflies. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B 270:393–399
Borst A, Egelhaaf M (1989) Principles of visual motion detection. Trends Neurosci 12:297–306
Borst A, Haag J (1996) The intrinsic electrophysiological characteristics of fly lobula plate tangential cells. I. Passive membrane properties. J Comp Neurosci 3:313–336
Borst A, Haag J (2002) Neural networks in the cockpit of the fly. J Comp Physiol A 188:419–437
Borst A, Egelhaaf M, Haag J (1995) Mechanisms of dendritic integration underlying gain control in fly motion-sensitive interneurons. J Comput Neurosci 2:5–18
Dror RO, O'Carroll DC, Laughlin SB (2001) Accuracy of velocity estimation by Reichardt correlators. J Opt Soc Am A 18:241–252
Egelhaaf M, Borst A (1993a) A look into the cockpit of the fly: visual orientation, algorithms, and identified neurons. J Neurosci 13:4563–4574
Egelhaaf M, Borst A (1993b) Movement detection in arthropods. In: Wallman J, Miles FA (eds) Visual motion and its role in the stabilization of gaze. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 53–77
Egelhaaf M, Kern R (2002) Vision in flying insects. Curr Opin Neurobiol 12:699–706
Egelhaaf M, Reichardt W (1987) Dynamic response properties of movement detectors: theoretical analysis and electrophysiological investigation in the visual system of the fly. Biol Cybern 56:69–87
Egelhaaf M, Warzecha A-K (1999) Encoding of motion in real time by the fly visual system. Curr Opin Neurobiol 9:454–460
Egelhaaf M, Kern R, Krapp HG, Kretzberg J, Warzecha A-K (2002) Neural encoding of behaviourally relevant motion information in the fly. Trends Neurosci 94:94–100
Franceschini N (1996) Engineering applications of small brains. FED J 7:38–52
Franceschini N, Pichon JM, Blanes C (1992) From insect vision to robot vision. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 337:283–294
Haag J, Borst A (1997) Encoding of visual motion information and reliability in spiking and graded potential neurons. J Neurosci 17:4809–4819
Haag J, Borst A (2000) Spatial distribution and characteristics of voltage-gated calcium signals within visual interneurons. J Neurophysiol 83:1039–1051
Haag J, Borst A (2001) Recurrent network interactions underlying flow-field selectivity of visual interneurons. J Neurosci 21:5685–5692
Haag J, Theunissen F, Borst A (1997) The intrinsic electrophysiological characteristics of fly lobula plate tangential cells. II. Active membrane properties. J Comput Neurosci 4:349–369
Haag J, Vermeulen A, Borst A (1999) The intrinsic electrophysiological characteristics of fly lobula plate tangential cells. III. visual response properties. J Comput Neurosci 7:213–234
Harrison RR, Koch C (2000) A silicon implementation of the fly's optomotor control system. Neural Comput 12:2291–2304
Hateren JH von, Schilstra C (1999) Blowfly flight and optic flow. II. Head movements during flight. J Exp Biol 202:1491–1500
Hausen K (1981) Monocular and binocular computation of motion in the lobula plate of the fly. Verh Dtsch Zool Ges 74:49–70
Hausen K, Egelhaaf M (1989) Neural mechanisms of visual course control in insects. In: Stavenga D, Hardie RC (eds) Facets of vision. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 391–424
Horstmann W, Egelhaaf M, Warzecha A-K (2000) Synaptic interactions increase optic flow specificity. Eur J Neurosci 12:2157–2165
Huber SA, Franz MO, Bülthoff HH (1999) On robots and flies: modeling the visual orientation behavior of flies. Robot Auton Syst 29:227–242
Ilg UJ (1997) Slow eye movement. Progr Neurobiol 53:293–329
Kern R, Lutterklas M, Egelhaaf M (2000) Neural representation of optic flow experienced by unilaterally blinded flies on their mean walking trajectories. J Comp Physiol A 186:467–479
Kern R, Petereit C, Egelhaaf M (2001a) Neural processing of naturalistic optic flow. J Neurosci 21:1–5
Kern R, Lutterklas M, Petereit C, Lindemann JP, Egelhaaf M (2001b) Neuronal processing of behaviourally generated optic flow: experiments and model simulations. Network Comput Neural Syst 12:351–369
Kimmerle B, Egelhaaf M (2000) Performance of fly visual interneurons during object fixation. J Neurosci 20:6256–6266
Krapp HG (2000) Neuronal matched filters for optic flow processing in flying insects. In: Lappe M (ed) Neuronal processing of optic flow. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 93–120
Kretzberg J, Egelhaaf M, Warzecha A-K (2001) Membrane potential fluctuations determine the precision of spike timing and synchronous activity: a model study. J Comput Neurosci 10:79–97
Land MF (1992) Visual tracking and pursuit: Humans and arthropods compared. J Insect Physiol 38:939–951
Land MF, Collett TS (1974) Chasing behaviour of houseflies (Fannia canicularis). A description and analysis. J Comp Physiol 89:331–357
Lindemann JP, Kern R, Michaelis C, Meyer P, Hateren JH van, Egelhaaf M (2003) FliMax, a novel stimulus device for panoramic and highspeed presentation of behaviourally generated optic flow. Vision Res 43:779–791
Liu S-C, Usseglio-Viretta A (2000) Visuo-motor fly-like responses of a robot using a VLSI motion-sensitive chip. Proc 2nd ICSC Symp Neural Comput
Reichardt W, Poggio (1976) Visual control of orientation behaviour in the fly. Part I. A quantitative analysis. Q Rev Biophys 9:311–375
Ruyter van Steveninck Rd, Bialek W (1995) Reliability and statistical efficiency of a blowfly movement-sensitive neuron. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 348:321–340
Ruyter van Steveninck Rd, Borst A, Bialek W (2001) Real-time encoding of motion: answerable questions and questionable answers from the fly's visual system. In: Zanker JM, Zeil J (eds) Motion vision. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 279–306
Schilstra C, Hateren JH von (1998) Stabilizing gaze in flying blowflies. Nature 395:654
Schilstra C, Hateren JH von (1999) Blowfly flight and optic flow. I. Thorax kinematics and flight dynamics. J Exp Biol 202:1481–1490
Single S, Haag J, Borst A (1997) Dendritic computation of direction selectivity and gain control in visual interneurons. J Neurosci 17:6023–6030
Wagner H (1986) Flight performance and visual control of the flight of the free-flying housefly (Musca domestica). II. Pursuit of targets. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 312:553–579
Warzecha A-K, Egelhaaf M (1997) How reliably does a neuron in the visual motion pathway of the fly encode behaviourally relevant information? Eur J Neurosci 9:1365–1374
Warzecha A-K, Egelhaaf M (1999) Variability in spike trains during constant and dynamic stimulation. Science 283:1927–1930
Warzecha A-K, Egelhaaf M (2001) Neuronal encoding of visual motion in real-time. In: Zanker JM, Zeil J (eds) Processing visual motion in the real world: a survey of computational, neural, and ecological constraints. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 239–277
Warzecha A-K, Kretzberg J, Egelhaaf M (1998) Temporal precision of the encoding of motion information by visual interneurons. Curr Biol 8:359–368
Warzecha A-K, Kretzberg J, Egelhaaf M (2000) Reliability of a fly motion-sensitive neuron depends on stimulus parameters. J Neurosci 20:8886–8896
Warzecha A-K, Kurtz R, Egelhaaf M (2003) Synaptic transfer of dynamic motion information between identified neurons in the visual system of the blowfly. Neuroscience (in press)
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to J. Grewe, K. Karmeier and R. Kurtz for critically reading a previous version of the paper. Our work is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Egelhaaf, M., Böddeker, N., Kern, R. et al. Visually guided orientation in flies: case studies in computational neuroethology. J Comp Physiol A 189, 401–409 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-003-0421-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-003-0421-3