Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic aldehydes in squirrel monkeys and pigtail macaques

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a conditioning paradigm, the olfactory sensitivity of three squirrel monkeys and three pigtail macaques for a homologous series of aliphatic aldehydes (n-butanal to n-nonanal) was assessed. With only few exceptions, the animals of both species significantly discriminated concentrations below 1 ppm from the odorless solvent, and with n-butanal and n-hexanal individual pigtail macaques even demonstrated thresholds below 1 ppb. The results showed (1) both primate species to have a well-developed olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic aldehydes, (2) pigtail macaques to generally perform better than squirrel monkeys in detecting members of this class of odorants, and (3) no significant correlation between perceptibility in terms of olfactory detection thresholds and carbon chain length of the aliphatic aldehydes in both species tested. These findings lend further support to the growing body of evidence suggesting that between-species comparisons of the number of functional olfactory receptor genes or of neuroanatomical features are poor predictors of olfactory performance. Further, our findings suggest that olfaction may play an important and hitherto underestimated role in the regulation of behavior in the species tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boinski S (1999) The social organizations of squirrel monkeys: implications for ecological models of social evolution. Evol Anthropol 8:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolen RH, Green SM (1997) Use of olfactory cues in foraging by owl monkeys (Aotus nancymai) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). J Comp Psychol 111:152–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brown WM (2001) Natural selection of mammalian brain components. Trends Ecol Evol 16:471–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buck L, Axel R (1991) A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell 65:175–187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Caldecott JO, Feistner ATC, Gadsby EL (1996) A comparison of ecological strategies of pig-tailed macaques, mandrills and drills. In: Fa JE, Lindburg DG (eds) Evolution and ecology of macaque societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 73–94

  • Cometto-Muniz JE, Cain WS, Abraham MH (1998) Nasal pungency and odor of homologous aldehydes and carboxylic acids. Exp Brain Res 118:180–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Winter W, Oxnard CE (2001) Evolutionary radiations and convergences in the structural organization of mammalian brains. Nature 409:710–714

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Doty RL (1986) Odor-guided behavior in mammals. Experientia 42:257–271

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dusenbery DB (1992) Sensory ecology. How organisms acquire and respond to information. Freeman, New York

  • Epple G, Belcher AM, Küderling I, Zeller U, Scolnick L, Greenfield KL, Smith AB (1993) Making sense out of scents: species differences in scent glands, scent-marking behavior, and scent-mark composition in the Callitrichidae. In: Rylands AB (ed) Marmosets and tamarins: systemactics, behavior, and ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 123–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Farbman AI (1992) Cell biology of olfaction. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Flood P (1985) Sources of significant smells: the skin and other organs. In: Brown RE, MacDonald DW (eds) Social odours in mammals. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 19–36

  • Glusman G, Yanai I, Rubin I, Lancet D (2001) The complete human olfactory subgenome. Genome Res 11:685–702

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hellman TM, Small FH (1974) Characterization of the odor properties of 101 petrochemicals using sensory methods. J Air Pollut Contr Assoc 24:979–982

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heymann EW (1998) Sex differences in olfactory communication in a primate, the moustached tamarin, Saginus mystax (Callitrichidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 43:37–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hübener F, Laska M (1998) Assessing olfactory performance in an Old World primate, Macaca nemestrina. Physiol Behav 64:521–527

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hübener F, Laska M (2001) A two-choice discrimination method to assess olfactory performance in pigtailed macaques, Macaca nemestrina. Physiol Behav 72:511–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Issel-Tarver L, Rine J (1997) The evolution of mammalian olfactory receptor genes. Genetics 145:185–195

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BA, Leon M (2000) Odorant molecular length: one aspect of the olfactory code. J Comp Neurol 426:330–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaluza JF, Breer H (2000) Responsiveness of olfactory neurons to distinct aliphatic aldehydes. J Exp Biol 203:927–933

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler P (1998) To whom it may concern: the transmission and function of chemical signals in Lemur catta. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:411–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King JE, Fobes JL (1974) Evolutionary changes in primate sensory capacities. J Hum Evol 3:435–443

    Google Scholar 

  • Laska M, Freyer D (1997) Olfactory discrimination ability for aliphatic esters in squirrel monkeys and humans. Chem Senses 22:457–465

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laska M, Hudson R (1993a) Assessing olfactory performance in a New World primate, Saimiri sciureus. Physiol Behav 53:89–95

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laska M, Hudson R (1993b) Discriminating parts from the whole: determinants of odor mixture perception in squirrel monkeys, Saimiri sciureus. J Comp Physiol A 173:249–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Laska M, Hudson R (1995) Ability of female squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus) to discriminate between conspecific urine odours. Ethology 99:39–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Laska M, Seibt A (2002a) Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic esters in squirrel monkeys and pigtail macaques. Behav Brain Res 134:165–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laska M, Seibt A (2002b) Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic alcohols in squirrel monkeys and pigtail macaques. J Exp Biol 205:1633–1643

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laska M, Teubner P (1998) Odor structure-activity relationships of carboxylic acids correspond between squirrel monkeys and humans. Am J Physiol 274: R1639–R1645

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laska M, Alicke T, Hudson R (1996) A study of long-term odor memory in squirrel monkeys, Saimiri sciureus. J Comp Psychol 110:125–130

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laska M, Liesen A, Teubner P (1999a) Enantioselectivity of odor perception in squirrel monkeys and humans. Am J Physiol 277:R1098–R1103

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laska M, Trolp S, Teubner P (1999b) Odor structure-activity relationships correspond between human and non-human primates. Behav Neurosci 113:998–1007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laska M, Seibt A, Weber A (2000) "Microsmatic" primates revisited—olfactory sensitivity in the squirrel monkey. Chem Senses 25:47–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maarse H (1991) Volatile compounds in foods and beverages. Dekker, New York

  • Mertl-Millhollen AS (1986) Olfactory demarcation of territorial but not home range boundaries by Lemur catta. Folia Primatol 50:175–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Passe DH, Walker JC (1985) Odor psychophysics in vertebrates. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 9:431–467

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rouquier S, Blancher A, Giorgi D (2000) The olfactory receptor gene repertoire in primates and mouse: evidence for reduction of the functional fraction in primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:2870–2874

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenemann PT (2001) Brain scaling, behavioral ability, and human evolution. Behav Brain Sci 24:293–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel S, Castellan NJ (1988) Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw Hill, New York

  • Smith TE, Abbott DH (1998) Behavioral discrimination between circumgenital odor from peri-ovulatory dominant and anovulatory female common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Am J Primatol 46:265–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephan H, Baron G, Frahm HD (1988) Comparative size of brains and brain structures. In: Steklis H, Erwin J (eds) Comparative Primate Biology, vol. 4. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 1–38

  • Stevens JC, Cain WS, Burke RJ (1988) Variability of olfactory thresholds. Chem Senses 13:643–653

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Teranishi R, Buttery RG, Guadagni DG (1974) Odor quality and chemical structure in fruit and vegetable flavors. Ann NY Acad Sci 23:209–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Ueno Y (1994) Olfactory discrimination of eight food flavors in the capuchin monkey, Cebus apella : comparison between fruity and fishy odors. Primates 35:301–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker JC, Jennings RA (1991) Comparison of odor perception in humans and animals. In: Laing DG, Doty RL, Breipohl W (eds) The human sense of smell. Springer, Berlin, pp 261–280

  • Weast RC (1987) Handbook of chemistry and physics, 68th edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton

  • Yee KK, Wysocki CJ (2001) Odorant exposure increases olfactory sensitivity: olfactory epithelium is implicated. Physiol Behav 72:705–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Young JM, Trask BJ (2002) The sense of smell: genomics of vertebrate odorant receptors. Human Mol Genet 11:1153–1160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft is gratefully acknowledged (La 635/10-1). The experiments reported here comply with the Principles of animal care, publication No. 86-23, revised 1985 of the National Institutes of Health, and also with current German laws.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Medical Psychology, University of Munich Medical School, Goethestr. 31, 80336, Munich, Germany

    M. Laska, M. Hofmann & Y. Simon

Authors
  1. M. Laska
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Hofmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Y. Simon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Laska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laska, M., Hofmann, M. & Simon, Y. Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic aldehydes in squirrel monkeys and pigtail macaques. J Comp Physiol A 189, 263–271 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-003-0395-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-003-0395-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation