Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Treatment of non-obstructive, non-struvite urolithiasis is effective in treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 14 November 2019

Purpose

Abstract

To determine if treatment of non-obstructing urolithiasis is effective in management of recurrent UTI.

Materials and methods

A retrospective review was performed of patients undergoing elective management of non-struvite upper tract urinary calculi with recurrent UTI from 2009 to 2016. Recurrent UTI was defined at ≥ 3 UTI in 12 months, with symptoms and documented urine culture. Preoperative CT was performed in all patients to determine stone burden. All patients had postoperative imaging and ≥ 12 months of follow-up. Pre- and postoperative variables were between patients who had recurrent UTI after treatment versus those who did not.

Results

46 patients met inclusion criteria. 42 (91.3%) were female. Median age was 63.7 years (IQR 49.1, 73.4) and median total stone burden was 20 mm (IQR 14–35). Within the cohort, 20 (43.5%) underwent ureteroscopy only, 26 (56.5%) underwent PCNL ± URS, and none underwent ESWL. Median postoperative follow-up was 2.9 years (IQR 2.0, 4.3). Only five patients (10.9%) had recurrent UTI after treatment. 80% were with the preoperative pathogen. The presence of residual stone was an independent risk factor for recurrent UTI after treatment (p < 0.046). Diabetes, hypertension, immunosuppression and chronic kidney disease were not.

Conclusions

Stone removal for patients with recurrent UTIs was associated with a high rate of success (89.1%) in elimination of further recurrent UTIs. Residual fragments are independently associated with persistent recurrent UTIs and thus, complete stone removal is of paramount importance in treatment of this patient population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Foxman B, Barlow R, D’Arcy H, Gillespie B, Sobel JD (2000) Urinary tract infection: self-reported incidence and associated costs. Ann Epidemiol 10:509–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mabeck CE (1972) Treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infection in non-pregnant women. Postgrad Med J 48:69–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Griebling TL (2005) Urologic diseases in America project: trends in resource use for urinary tract infections in women. J Urol 173:1281–1287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Griebling TL (2005) Urologic diseases in America project: trends in resource use for urinary tract infections in men. J Urol 173:1288–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barr-Beare E, Saxena V, Hilt EE et al (2015) The Interaction between Enterobacteriaceae and calcium oxalate deposits. PLoS One 10:e0139575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rocha H, Santos LC (1969) Relapse of urinary tract infection in the presence of urinary tract calculi: the role of bacteria within the calculi. J Med Microbiol 2:372–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chih-Yen H, Hsing-Lin LIN, Yen-Ko LIN et al (2014) Urinary tract infection in patients with chronic kidney disease. Turk J Med Sci 44:145–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Varda BK, McNabb-Baltar J, Sood A et al (2015) Urolithiasis and urinary tract infection among patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a review of US emergency department visits between 2006 and 2009. Urology. 85:764–770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abbo LM, Hooton TM (2014) Antimicrobial stewardship and urinary tract infections. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) 05(3):174–192

    Google Scholar 

  10. Omar M, Abdulwahab-Ahmed A, Chaparala H, Monga M (2015) Does stone removal help patients with recurrent urinary tract infections? J Urol 194:997–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cui X, Ji F, Yan H et al (2015) Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones: a meta-analysis. Urology 85:748–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fankhauser CD, Hermanns T, Lieger L et al (2018) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus flexible ureterorenoscopy in the treatment of untreated renal calculi. Clin Kidney J 11(3):364–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. de Cógáin MR, Lieske JC, Vrtiska TJ, Tosh PK, Krambeck AE (2014) Secondarily infected nonstruvite urolithiasis: a prospective evaluation. Urology 84:1295–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Paonessa JE, Gnessin E, Bhojani N, Williams JC Jr, Lingeman JE (2016) Preoperative bladder urine culture as a predictor of intraoperative stone culture results: clinical implications and relationship to stone composition. J Urol 196:769–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DKA: Protocol/project development, Data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing; AEK: Protocol/project development, Data collection, manuscript writing and editing; VS: Data analysis, manuscript writing and editing; FJM: Data collection, manuscript writing and editing; MEW: Data analysis; JJK: Manuscript editing; MER: Protocol/project development, Data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcelino E. Rivera.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

AEK—Paid consultant for Lumenis and Boston Scientific. Non-paid consultant for Thermadex. No other authors have disclosures.

Research involving human participants

Appropriate Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this retrospective review.

Informed consent

An informed consent waiver was approved due to the retrospective nature of this research.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agarwal, D.K., Krambeck, A.E., Sharma, V. et al. Treatment of non-obstructive, non-struvite urolithiasis is effective in treatment of recurrent urinary tract infections. World J Urol 38, 2029–2033 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02977-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02977-3

Keywords

Navigation