Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Renal stone composition does not affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

We sought to investigate the association between renal stone composition and percutaneous nephrolithotomy outcomes in pediatric patients and define the characterization of the stone composition.

Methods

The data of 1157 children who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy between 1991 and 2012 were retrieved from the multicenter database of the Turkish Pediatric Urology Society. The study population comprised 359 children (160 girls, 199 boys) with stone analyses. Patients were divided into five groups according to the stone composition [group 1: calcium oxalate; group 2: calcium phosphate; group 3: infection stones (magnesium ammonium phosphate, ammonium urate); group 4: cystine; group 5: uric acid, xanthine stones].

Results

Patient characteristics, perioperative, postoperative, and stone characteristics were compared considering the stone composition. There were no significant differences between the groups concerning age, sex, side involved, preoperative hematocrit levels, and solitary renal unit. Patients with cystine stones were more likely to have a history of stone treatment. Groups 2 and 5 had mostly solitary stones. However, group 3 had staghorn stone more often, and group 4 frequently had multiple stones. Overall stone-free rate (79.4%) was similar among the groups. Although stone composition was related to blood transfusion and prolonged operative and fluoroscopy screening times on univariate analysis, it was not a significant predictor of them on multivariate analysis.

Conclusions

Stone composition was not a predictor of outcomes of pediatric percutaneous nephrolithotomy. However, cystine and infection stones, which are larger and filled multiple calyxes due to the nature of stone forming, were more challenging cases that need multiple tracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lu P, Wang Z, Song R et al (2015) The clinical efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in pediatric urolithiasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis 43(3):199–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0757-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tekgül S, Doğan HS, Erdem E et al (2015) Urınary stone disease. EAU Guidel Paediatr Urol pp 51–58

  3. Ringdén I, Tiselius HG (2007) Composition and clinically determined hardness of urinary tract stones. Scand J Urol Nephrol 41(4):316–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheir KZ, Mansour O, Madbouly K, Elsobky E, Abdel-Khalek M (2005) Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by noncontrast spiral computerized tomography. Urol Res 33(2):99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Assmy A, El-Nahas AR, Abou-El-Ghar ME, Awad BA, Sheir KZ (2013) Kidney stone size and Hounsfield units predict successful shockwave lithotripsy in children. Urology 81(4):880–884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.12.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pérez-Fentes DA, Gude F, Blanco M, Novoa R, Freire CG (2013) Predictive analysis of factors associated with percutaneous stone surgery outcomes. Can J Urol 20(6):7050–7059

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gok A, Polat H, Cift A et al (2015) The hounsfield unit value calculated with the aid of non-contrast computed tomography and its effect on the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis 43(3):277–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0766-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Anastasiadis A, Onal B, Modi P, Croes PCNL Study Group et al (2013) Impact of stone density on outcomes in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL): an analysis of the clinical research office of the endourological society (CROES) PCNL global study database. Scand J Urol 47(6):509–514. https://doi.org/10.3109/21681805.2013.803261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Preminger GM, Assimos DG, Lingeman JE, Nakada SY, Pearle MS, Wolf JS Jr, Members of the AUA Nephrolithiasis Guideline Panel (2005) Chapter 1: AUA guideline on management of staghorn calculi: diagnosis and treatment recommendations. J Urol 173(6):1991–2000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Satava RM (2005) Identification and reduction of surgical error using simulation. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14(4):257–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirejczyk JK, Porowski T, Filonowicz R et al (2014) An association between kidney stone composition and urinary metabolic disturbances in children. J Pediatr Urol 10(1):130–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2013.07.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Straub M, Strohmaier WL, Berg W et al (2005) Diagnosis and metaphylaxis of stone disease. Consensus concept of the national working committee on stone disease for the upcoming german urolithiasis guideline. World J Urol 23(5):309–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tasian GE, Copelovitch L (2014) Evaluation and medical management of kidney stones in children. J Urol 192(5):1329–1336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.04.108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Onal B, Dogan C, Citgez S et al (2013) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children with cystine stone: long-term outcomes from a single institution. J Urol 190(1):234–237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.01.016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Viprakasit DP, Sawyer MD, Herrell SD, Miller NL (2011) Changing composition of staghorn calculi. J Urol 186(6):2285–2290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.07.089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jou YC, Lu CL, Chen FH et al (2015) Contributing factors for fever after tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 85(3):527–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cadeddu JA, Chen R, Bishoff J et al (1998) Clinical significance of fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology 52(1):48–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Olvera-Posada D, Tailly T, Alenezi H et al (2015) Risk factors for postoperative complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy at a tertiary referral center. J Urol 194(6):1646–1651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.06.095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kukreja R, Desai M, Patel S, Bapat S, Desai M (2004) Factors affecting blood loss during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: prospective study. J Endourol 18(8):715–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Söylemez H, Bozkurt Y, Penbegül N et al (2013) Time-dependent oxidative stress effects of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urolithiasis 41(1):65–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012-0532-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bagrodia A, Gupta A, Raman JD, Bensalah K, Pearle MS, Lotan Y (2009) Predictors of cost and clinical outcomes of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy. J Urol 182(2):586–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.04.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Akman T, Binbay M, Akcay M et al (2011) Variables that influence operative time during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: an analysis of 1897 cases. J Endourol 25(8):1269–1273. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2011.0061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

For this work, Bulent Onal was supported by Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Istanbul University, Project number 1030-24135.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

OK: project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing. FAT: data collection or management. NS: data collection or management. EÖ: data collection or management. ST: data collection or management. HSD: data collection or management. MMP: data collection or management. Vİ: data collection or management. ŞS: data collection or management. HK: data collection or management. TÇ: data collection or management. AÖ: data collection or management. ST: data collection or management. BÖ: project development, data collection or management, data analysis, manuscript writing/editing

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Onur Kaygısız.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study that involved human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Research Committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaygısız, O., Türegün, F.A., Satar, N. et al. Renal stone composition does not affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in children. World J Urol 36, 1863–1869 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2325-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2325-4

Keywords

Navigation