Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of functional outcomes of robotic and open partial nephrectomy in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease: a multicenter study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

We compared renal functional outcomes of robotic (RPN) and open partial nephrectomy (OPN) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), a definite indication for nephron-sparing surgery.

Methods

A multicenter retrospective analysis of OPN and RPN in patients with baseline ≥ CKD Stage III [estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2] was performed. Primary outcome was change in eGFR (ΔeGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2) between preoperative and last follow-up with respect to RENAL nephrometry score group [simple (4–6), intermediate (7–9), complex (10–12)]. Secondary outcomes included eGFR decline > 50%.

Results

728 patients (426 OPN, 302 RPN, mean follow-up 33.3 months) were analyzed. Similar RENAL score distribution (p = 0.148) was noted between groups. RPN had lower median estimated blood loss (p < 0.001), and hospital stay (3 vs. 5 days, p < 0.001). Median ischemia time (OPN 23.7 vs. RPN 21.5 min, p = 0.089), positive margin (p = 0.256), transfusion (p = 0.166), and 30-day complications (p = 0.208) were similar. For OPN vs. RPN, mean ΔeGFR demonstrated no significant difference for simple (0.5 vs. 0.3, p = 0.328), intermediate (2.1 vs. 2.1, p = 0.384), and complex (4.9 vs. 6.1, p = 0.108). Cox regression analysis demonstrated that decreasing preoperative eGFR (OR 1.10, p = 0.001) and complex RENAL score (OR 5.61, p = 0.03) were independent predictors for eGFR decline > 50%. Kaplan–Meier analysis demonstrated 5-year freedom from eGFR decline > 50% of 88.6% for OPN and 88.3% for RPN (p = 0.724).

Conclusions

RPN and OPN demonstrated similar renal functional outcomes when stratified by tumor complexity group. Increasing tumor age and tumor complexity were primary drivers associated with functional decline. RPN provides similar renal functional outcomes to OPN in appropriately selected patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Canter D, Kutikov A, Sirohi M et al (2011) Prevalence of baseline chronic kidney disease in patients presenting with solid renal tumors. Urology 77:781–785

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Campbell S, Uzzo RG, Allaf ME et al (2017) Renal mass and localized renal cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol 198:520–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S et al (2015) EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 67:913–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liss MA, Wang S, Palazzi K et al (2014) Evaluation of national trends in the utilization of partial nephrectomy in relation to the publication of the American Urologic Association guidelines for the management of clinical T1 renal masses. BMC Urol 14:101

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lane BR, Novick AC, Babineau D, Fergany AF, Kaouk JH, Gill IS (2008) Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney. J Urol 179:847–851

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arora S, Abaza R, Adshead JM et al (2018) ‘Trifecta’ outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in solitary kidney: a Vattikuti Collective Quality Initiative (VCQI) database analysis. BJU Int 121:119–123

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Scoll BJ, Uzzo RG, Chen DY et al (2010) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a large single-institutional experience. Urology 75:1328–1334

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Stroup SP, Hamilton ZA, Marshall MT et al (2017) Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for Pentafecta perioperative and renal functional outcomes. World J Urol 35:1721–1728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Capitanio U, Terrone C, Antonelli A et al (2015) Nephron-sparing techniques independently decrease the risk of cardiovascular events relative to radical nephrectomy in patients with a T1a-T1b renal mass and normal preoperative renal function. Eur Urol 67:683–689

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Viprakasit DP, Derweesh I, Wong C et al (2011) Selective renal parenchymal clamping in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional experience. J Endourol 25:1487–1491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaouk JH, Samarasekera D, Krishnan J et al (2014) Robotic partial nephrectomy with intracorporeal renal hypothermia using ice slush. Urology 84:712–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. AJCC (2010) Cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2009) The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 182:844–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB et al (1999) A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of diet in renal disease study group. Ann Intern Med 130:461–470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lane BR, Demirjian S, Derweesh IH et al (2015) Survival and functional stability in chronic kidney disease due to surgical removal of nephrons: importance of the new baseline glomerular filtration rate. Eur Urol 68:996–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Lane BR et al (2007) Comparison of 1800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors. J Urol 178:41–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fergany AF, Saad IR, Woo L, Novick AC (2006) Open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: experience with 400 cases. J Urol 175:1630–1633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ching CB, Lane BR, Campbell SC, Li J, Fergany AF (2013) Five to 10-year followup of open partial nephrectomy in a solitary kidney. J Urol 190:470–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Panumatrassamee K, Autorino R, Laydner H et al (2013) Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: a single institution comparative analysis. Int J Urol 20:484–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hillyer SP, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME et al (2013) Robotic partial nephrectomy for solitary kidney: a multi-institutional analysis. Urology 81:93–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Long JA, Lee B, Eyraud R et al (2012) Robotic partial nephrectomy: imperative vs. elective indications. Urology 80:833–837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kumar RK, Sammon JD, Kaczmarek BF et al (2014) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with baseline chronic kidney disease: a multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis. Eur Urol 65:1205–1210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zargar H, Bhayani S, Allaf ME et al (2014) Comparison of perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy and open partial nephrectomy in patients with a solitary kidney. J Endourol 28:1224–1230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Takagi T, Kondo T, Tachibana H et al (2017) Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy in patients with chronic kidney disease: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis of surgical outcomes. Int J Urol 24:505–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kopp RP, Mehrazin R, Palazzi K et al (2012) Factors affecting renal function after open partial nephrectomy-a comparison of clampless and clamped warm ischemic technique. Urology 80:865–870

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Simmons MN, Hillyer SP, Lee BH, Fergany AF, Kaouk J, Campbell SC (2012) Nephrometry score is associated with volume loss and functional recovery after partial nephrectomy. J Urol 188:39–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mehrazin R, Palazzi KL, Kopp RP et al (2013) Impact of tumour morphology on renal function decline after partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 111:E374–E382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Patel A, Golan S, Razmaria A, Prasad S, Eggener S, Shalhav A (2014) Early discharge after laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy: care pathway evaluation. BJU Int 113:592–597

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bertolo RG, Zargar H, Autorino R et al (2017) Estimated glomerular filtration rate, renal scan and volumetric assessment of the kidney before and after partial nephrectomy: a review of the current literature. Minerva Urol Nefrol 69:539–547

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Marconi L, Desai MM, Ficarra V et al (2016) Renal Preservation and partial nephrectomy: patient and surgical factors. Eur Urol Focus. 2:589–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The project was supported by Stephen Weissman Kidney Cancer Research Fund. Biostatistical analyses were supported by NIH Grants UL1TR000100/UL1TR001442.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Hamilton: project development and manuscript writing/editing. Uzzo: protocol development and manuscript editing. Larcher: data collection, data analysis and manuscript writing/editing. Lane: protocol development and manuscript writing/editing. Capitanio: data interpretation and manuscript writing/editing. Ristau: data collection, data analysis and manuscript writing/editing. Ryan: data collection and data management. Dey: data collection and data management and interpretation. Correa: data collection and data management. Reddy: data collection and data management. Proudfoot: data collection, data management and data analysis. Nasseri: data collection, data management and data analysis. Yim: data collection and data management. Noyes: data collection and data analysis. Correa: data collection and manuscript editing. Bindayi: data analysis and manuscript writing. Montorsi: project development and manuscript editing. Derweesh: protocol/project development and manuscript writing/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ithaar H. Derweesh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical standards

Ethical standards have been met; the study has been IRB approved at all institutions.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hamilton, Z.A., Uzzo, R.G., Larcher, A. et al. Comparison of functional outcomes of robotic and open partial nephrectomy in patients with pre-existing chronic kidney disease: a multicenter study. World J Urol 36, 1255–1262 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2261-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2261-3

Keywords

Navigation