Abstract
Ferroelectric (piezoelectric) Pb (Zr0.52Ti0.48) O3 (PZT) films were synthesized using an aerosol-assisted chemical vapor deposition technique on (111) Pt/Ti/SiO2/Si substrates. The optimum deposition temperature was 350 °C, followed by annealing at 650 °C for 1 h. Tetragonal perovskite phase and preferred orientation {0 0 1} in the PZT films were determined by two-dimensional grazing incidence diffraction using synchrotron X-ray radiation and nano-beam electron diffraction (NBED). The PZT film grains’ texture, represented by inverse pole representation, correlates with (0 0 1) and (1 1 1) orientations with approximate XRD peak distribution width of Ω ≈ 35°. The elastic-to-plastic transition of the piezoelectric-based structural deformation of the PZT films is represented by the pop-in, which marks the limit in the elastic behavior at the yield stress for which the material starts exhibiting permanent deformation, with the yield point being Y = 2.5 ± 0.7 GPa for the Pb (Zr0.52Ti0.48) O3 film. The hardness (H = 7.5 ± 0.16 GPa), elastic modulus (E = 126 ± 3 GPa), and scratching were evaluated at the nanoscale, using a nanoindentation technique. No delamination or cracks were observed near the residual scratching stage. The switching of piezoelectric domains and domain polarization process, as a function of films’ texture, in the representative Pb (Zr0.52Ti0.48) O3 films, were studied using Piezoresponse Force Microscopy (PFM). The values of the saturation polarization, remnant polarization, coercive field, and piezoelectric constant were Ps = 45 μC/cm2, Pr =30 μC/cm2, Ec = 22 kV/cm, and d33 = 137 pm/V, respectively. The local piezoelectric hysteresis loops and film nanostructure correlate with the polarization orientation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
D.G. Wang, C.Z. Chen, J. Ma, T.H. Liu, Appl. Surf. Sci. 255, 1637–1645 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.09.053
G.D. Shilpa, K. Sreelakshmi, M.G. Ananthaprasad, I.O.P. Conf, Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 149, 1–8 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/149/1/012190
S. Monga, N. Sharma, N. Mehan, A. Singh, Ceram. Int. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.05.039
T. Avanish Babu, W. Madhuri, Chem. Phys. Lett. 799, 139641 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2022.139641
Z. Xu, W.H. Chan, Acta Mater. 55, 3923–3928 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2007.03.008
M. Lisca, L. Pintilie, M. Alexe, C.M. Teodorescu, Appl. Surf. Sci. 252, 4549–4552 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2005.07.149
K.M. Byun, W.J. Lee, Curr. Appl. Phys. 7, 113–117 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2006.02.003
J.M. Koo, S. Kim, S. Shin, Y. Park, J.K. Lee, Ceram. Int. 34, 1003–1006 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2007.09.067
M. Veith, M. Bender, T. Lehnert, M. Zimmer, A. Jakob, Dalt. Trans. 40, 1175–1182 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c0dt00830c
D. Bao, X. Yao, N. Wakiya, K. Shinozaki, N. Mizutani, Mater. Sci. Eng. B Solid-State Mater. Adv. Technol. 94, 269–274 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-5107(02)00131-9
Y.Y. Tomashpol’skii, L.F. Rybakova, T.V. Lunina, O.F. Fedoseeva, S.G. Prutchenko, S.A. Men’shikh, Inorg. Mater. 37, 500–507 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017537102999
J. Ramos-Cano, A. Hurtado-Macías, W. Antúnez-Flores, L. Fuentes-Cobas, J. González-Hernández, P. Amézaga-Madrid, M. Miki-Yoshida, Thin Solid Films 531, 179–184 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2013.01.021
N. Ledermann, P. Muralt, J. Baborowski, S. Gentil, K. Mukati, M. Cantoni, A. Seifert, N. Setter, Sensors Actuators A Phys. 105, 162–170 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-4247(03)00090-6
R. Takei, N. Makimoto, H. Okada, T. Itoh, T. Kobayashi, Design of piezoelectric MEMS cantilever for low-frequency vibration energy harvester. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. (2016). https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.55.06GP14
K. Uchino, Ferroelectrics devices (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 2009)
E.A. Eliseev, S.V. Kalinin, S. Jesse, S.L. Bravina, A.N. Morozovska, J. Appl. Phys. (2007). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2749463
S. Jesse, A.P. Baddorf, S.V. Kalinin, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 062908 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2172216
M. Prabu, I.B. Shameem Banu, S. Gobalakrishnan, P.K. Praseetha, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 27, 5351–5356 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-016-4434-4
N. Vittayakorn, G. Rujijanagul, D.P. Cann, J. Alloys Compd. 440, 259–264 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2006.09.028
D. Perednis, L.J. Gauckler, J. Electroceramics. 14, 103–111 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10832-005-0870-x
K.L. Choy, Prog. Mater. Sci. 48, 57–170 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(01)00009-3
M. Cruz, L. Hernán, J. Morales, L. Sánchez, J. Power Sources. 108, 35–40 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7753(02)00006-X
D. Pérez-Mezcua, R. Sirera, I. Bretos, J. Ricote, R. Jimenez, L. Fuentes-Cobas, R. Escobar-Galindo, D. Chateigner, M. Lourdes Calzada, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 97, 1269–1275 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jace.12753
L. Fuentes-Montero, M.E. Montero-Cabrera, L. Fuentes-Cobas, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 44, 241–246 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889810048739
E.E. Villalobos-Portillo, D.C. Burciaga-Valencia, L. Fuentes-Montero, M.E. Montero-Cabrera, D. Chateigner, L.E. Fuentes-Cobas, Bol. La Soc. Esp. Ceram. y Vidr. 59, 219–228 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bsecv.2019.12.002
D.A. Northrop, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 50, 441–445 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1967.tb15157.x
Y. Ma, J. Song, X. Wang, Y. Liu, J. Zhou, Coatings 11, 944 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings11080944
J.B. Pethica, W.C. Oliver, Phys. Scr. 1987, 61–66 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-8949/1987/T19A/010
X. Li, B. Bhushan, Mater. Charact. 48, 11–36 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S1044-5803(02)00192-4
W.C. Oliver, G.M. Pharr, J. Mater. Res. 19, 3–20 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1557/jmr.2004.19.1.3
A.C. Fischer-Cripps, J. Mater. Res. 16, 3050–3052 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1557/JMR.2001.0421
I.N. Sneddon, Int. J. Eng. Sci. 3, 47–57 (1965). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7225(65)90019-4
A. Fischer-Cripps, D. Nicholson, Nanoindentation. mechanical engineering series. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Digital Collect. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1704625
M.V. Swain, J.T. Hagan, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 9, 2201–2214 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/9/15/011
J. Ramos-Cano, M. Miki-Yoshida, A.M. Gonçalves, J.A. Eiras, J. González-Hernández, J.A. Rodríguez-López, P. Amézaga-Madrid, A. Hurtado-Macías, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 14328–14334 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ie401134m
S.C. Hwang, C.S. Lynch, R.M. McMeeking, Acta Metall. Mater. 43, 2073–2084 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0956-7151(94)00379-V
A.B. Schäufele, K.H. Härdtl, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79, 2637–2640 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb09027.x
Y. Gaillard, A.H. Macías, J. MũozSaldãa, M. Anglada, G. Trpaga, J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/42/8/085502
M.C. Rodríguez-Aranda, F. Calderón-Piñar, F.J. Espinoza-Beltrán, F.J. Flores-Ruiz, E. León-Sarabia, R. Mayén-Mondragón, J.M. Yáñez-Limón, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 25, 4806–4813 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-014-2237-z
H.D. Chen, K.R. Udayakumar, C.J. Gaskey, L.E. Cross, Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 3411 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.115263
D. Bao, X. Yao, K. Shinozaki, N. Mizutani, J. Cryst. Growth. 259, 352–357 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2003.08.004
X. Zhao, J.Y. Dai, X.G. Tang, J. Wang, H.L.W. Chan, C.L. Choy, Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 81, 997–1000 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-004-2977-3
J.E. Leal-Perez, G. Herrera-Perez, G.V. Umoh, A. Hurtado-Macias, Mater. Chem. Phys. 284, 126033 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2022.126033
A. Roelofs, U. Böttger, R. Waser, F. Schlaphof, S. Trogisch, L.M. Eng, Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 3444–3446 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1328049
Z. Chen, J. Huang, Y. Yang, Y. Wang, Y. Wu, H. He, X. Wei, Z. Ye, H. Zeng, H. Cong, Z. Jiang, RSC Adv. 2, 7380–7383 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ra20237a
H.B. Kang, J. Chang, K. Koh, L. Lin, Y.S. Cho, A.C.S. Appl, Mater. Interfaces. 6, 10576–10582 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/am502234q
Q. Guo, G.Z. Cao, I.Y. Shen, Measurements of piezoelectric coefficient d33 of lead zirconate titanate thin films using a mini force hammer. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Digital Collect. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4006881/379183
Acknowledgements
The authors sincerely appreciate the technical support of TEM and AFM characterization to the following colleagues; Roberto P. Talamantes, Glory V. Umoh, Oscar Solis Canto, E. Cruz-Solano, and J. E. Leal-Perez. O. Auciello acknowledges the University of Texas-Dallas for support through his Distinguished Endowed Chair grant, to work on the project, which science is described in this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ramos-Cano, C.J., Miki-Yoshida, M., Herrera-Basurto, R. et al. Effect of the orientation polarization and texturing on nano-mechanical and piezoelectric properties of PZT (52/48) films. Appl. Phys. A 129, 113 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-022-06374-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-022-06374-3