Skip to main content
Log in

Innovative monitoring campaign of the environmental conditions of the Stibbert museum in Florence

  • Invited Paper
  • Published:
Applied Physics A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conservation of ancient metallic artefact displayed inside museums is a complex problem due to the large number of constraints mainly related to the artefacts fruition by people. The development of a simple procedure for monitoring the artefact conservation state promptly highlighting risky conditions without impacting on the normal museum operations could be of interest in the cultural heritage world. This paper describes the interesting results obtained by using a highly sensitive and innovative methodology for evaluating the safety level of the museum indoor areas, and more specifically of the interior of the showcases, with respect to the metallic artefacts. The methodology is based on the use of an innovative smart sensors network and of copper reference samples. The smart sensors network was employed for the continuous monitoring of temperature and relative humidity close to the artefacts, i.e. inside the display showcases. The reference specimens were Cu coated with a 100 nm Cu nanostructured layer put for 1 year in the exhibition rooms inside and outside the showcases and characterised by means of normal imaging, colorimetric and FESEM techniques at regular intervals. The results of the monitoring activity evidenced the higher reactivity to the environmental aggressivity of the nanocoated copper specimen with respect to bulk artefacts and therefore the possibility to use them as alerts to possible corrosion phenomena that may occur to the real artefacts. A proper temperature and relative humidity monitoring inside the showcases and close to each group of artefacts is a powerful though economic and non-invasive way to highlight most of the possible critical display conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D. Knotkova, K. Kreislova, B. Kreibichova, I. Kudlacek, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Conservation Strategies for Saving Indoor Metallic Collections, Cairo, Egypt, 2007, pp. 64–71

  2. T. Prosek, M. Kouril, M. Dubus, M. Taube, V. Hubert, B. Scheffel, Y. Degres, M. Jouannic, D. Thierry, Stud. Conserv. 58(2), 117 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. E. Angelini, S. Grassini, D. Mombello, A. Neri, M. Parvis, G. Perrone, Appl. Phys. A 100, 975 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. E. Angelini, S. Grassini, S. Corbellini, M. Parvis, M. Piantanida, Appl. Phys. A 100(3), 763 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Abdelhamid, S. Grassini, E. Angelini, G.M. Ingo, M.A. Harith, Spectrochim Acta Part B At Spectrosc 65, 695 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruth Johnston-Feller ‘Color Science in the Examination of Museum Objects’—The Getty Conservation Institute, j. Paul Getty Trust, 2001. Available at www.getty.edu/conservation/publications…/pdf…/color_science.pdf, last checked 2015-08-18

  7. Standard Practice for Calculation of Color Tolerances and Color Differences from Instrumentally Measured Color Coordinates, ASTM D2244-15e1

  8. J. Winter, C. Maines, J. Dickerson, Application of image processing and analysis in research on works of art, in Imaging the Past Electronic Imaging and Computer Graphics in Museums and archaeology, British Museum Occasional Paper 114, ed. by T. Higgins, P. Main, J. Lang (British Museum Press, London, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Thornbush, H. Viles, Integrated digital photography and image processing for the quantification of colouration on soiled limestone surface in Oxford, England. J Cult Herit, 5 (2004)

  10. Crawford et al. A standardised Remote monitoring photographic capture system (RMPCS) for in situ documentation of corrosion protection system test. in Metals and Museum in the Mediterranean, Protecting, Preserving and Interpreting, TEI of Athens (2008)

  11. M. Antonini, M. Barlaud, P. Mathieu, I. Daubechies, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 1(2), 205–220 (1992)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. D.M. Chandler, S.S. Hemami, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 14(4), 397 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. H.G. Senel, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 18(4), 867 (2009)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. R.W. Cox, R. Tong, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 8(9), 1297 (1999)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. R. Wilson, A.D. Calway, E.R.S. Pearson, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 38(2–2), 674 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. S. Corbellini, F. Ferraris, A. Neri, M. Parvis, E. Angelini, S. Grassini, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 60, 1691 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Angelini, S. Grassini, D. Mombello, A. Neri, M. Parvis, Appl. Phys. A 100, 919 (2010)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. National Park Service “Conserve O’ Gram” available at http://www.nps.gov/museum/publications/conserveogram/03-03.pdf, last checked on 2015-08-05

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Angelini.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Angelini, E., Civita, F., Corbellini, S. et al. Innovative monitoring campaign of the environmental conditions of the Stibbert museum in Florence. Appl. Phys. A 122, 123 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-9635-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-016-9635-4

Keywords

Navigation