Skip to main content
Log in

Increasing the accuracy of surface area estimation using single wax dipping of coral fragments

  • Note
  • Published:
Coral Reefs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The measurement of coral surface area is critical to normalising a suit of physiologically significant parameters to greater understand how corals interact with the surrounding environment. The surface area detection from skeletal fragments subsequently needs to be both as accurate as possible, yet practical and robust enough to be performed with minimal laboratory equipment. By using X-Ray CT technology, as a highly accurate surface area standard, 12 coral specimens from 4 different genera were studied using single wax versus double wax dipping methods. Our results reveal that the single wax dipping is far more accurate than the more commonly practised double wax dipping, thereby leading to more accurate estimation of the physiologically active surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  • Bythell JC, Pan P, Lee J (2001) Three-dimensional morphometric measurements of reef corals using underwater photogrammetry techniques. Coral Reefs 20:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chancerelle Y (2000) Méthodes d’ estimation des surfaces développées de coraux scléractiniaires à l échelle d’une colonie ou d’un peoplement. Oceanol Acta 20:193–199

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl AL (1973) Surface area in ecological analysis: quantification of benthic coral-reef algae. Mar Biol 23:239–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmunds PJ, Gates RD (2002) Normalizing physiological data for scleractinian corals. Coral Reefs 21:193–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmuth BST, Timmerman BEH, Sebens KP (1997) Interplay of host morphology and symbiont microhabitat in coral aggregation. Mar Biol 130:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh-Guldberg O (1988) A method for determining surface area of corals. Coral Reefs 7:113–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh-Guldberg O, Williamson J (1999) Availability of two forms of dissolved nitrogen to the coral Pocillopora damicornis and its symbiotic zooxanthellae. Mar Biol 133:561–570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh-Guldberg O, Fine M, Skirving W, Johnstone R, Dove S, Strong A (2005) Coral bleaching following wintery weather. Limnol Oceanogr 50:265–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes G (2008) Estimating three-dimensional surface areas on coral reefs. J Exp Mar Bio Ecol 365:67–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes G, Ortiz J, Kaniewska P, Johnstone R (2008) Using three-dimensional surface area to compare the growth of two Pocillopora coral species. Mar Biol 155:421–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones AM, Cantin NE, Berkelmans R, Sinclair B, Negri AP (2008) A 3-D modelling method to calculate the surface areas of coral branches. Coral Reefs 27:521–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruszyński KJ, Kaandorp JA, van Liere R (2007) A computational method for quantifying morphological variation in scleractinian corals. Coral Reefs 26:831–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laforsch C, Christoph E, Glaser C, Naunann M, Wild C, Niggl W (2008) A precise and non-destructive method to calculate the surface area in living scleractinian corals using X-ray computed tomography and 3D modeling. Coral Reefs 27:811–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lesser MP, Mazel C, Phinney D, Yentsch CS (2000) Light absorption and utilization by colonies of the congeneric hermatypic corals Montastraea faveolata and Montastraea cavernosa. Limnol Oceanogr 45:76–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh JA (1970) Primary productivity of reef-building calcareous red algae. Ecology 51:255–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers JL, Schultz ET (1985) Tissue condition and growth rate of coral associated with schooling fish. Limnol Oceanogr 30:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naumann MS, Niggl W, Laforsch C, Glaser C, Wild C (2009) Coral surface area quantification-evaluation of established techniques by comparison with computer tomography. Coral Reefs 28:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stimson J, Kinzie RA (1991) The temporal pattern and rate of release of zooxanthellae from the reef coral Pocillopora damicornis (Linnaeus) under nitrogen-enrichment and control conditions. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 153:63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veal CJ, Holmes G, Nunez M, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Osborn J (2010) A comparative study of methods for surface area and three dimensional shape measurement of coral skeletons. Limnol Oceanogr Meth 8:241–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Vytopil E, Willis BL (2001) Epifaunal community structure in Acropora spp. (Scleractinia) on the Great Barrier Reef: implications of coral morphology and habitat complexity. Coral Reefs 20:281–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance from the Interuniversity Institute for Marine Science, Eilat, Israel. Access to X-Ray CT facilities was made possible thanks to Dr. Ilan Shelef, Head of Neuroradiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Soroka University Medical Centre, Israel. This manuscript has benefited significantly from the anonymous feedback of 2 reviewers. This research was part funded through an Australian Research Council industry linkage with the United States of America, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (to OHG) as well as the 2009 Australian Israeli Scientific Exchange Foundation (to CJV).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. J. Veal.

Additional information

Communicated by Biology Editor Dr. Andrew Baird

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Veal, C.J., Carmi, M., Fine, M. et al. Increasing the accuracy of surface area estimation using single wax dipping of coral fragments. Coral Reefs 29, 893–897 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-010-0647-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-010-0647-9

Keywords

Navigation