Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project: implications for genetics research

  • Published:
Mammalian Genome Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heterogeneity of disorders, comorbidity across diagnoses, and reification of existing disease classifications are some of the challenges facing psychiatry in the twenty-first century. NIMH’s Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project seeks to address these issues by defining basic dimensions of function that cut across disorders as traditionally defined and can be studied across multiple units of analysis, from genes to neural circuits to behaviors. The intent is to translate rapid progress in basic genetic, neurobiological, and behavioral research to an improved integrative understanding of psychopathology. In so doing, RDoC seeks to facilitate the development of new and/or optimally targeted treatments for mental disorders. The RDoC project would not have been possible without NIMH’s long-term investment in basic research. Without the continuation of basic research, both related and unrelated to current RDoC domains and constructs, it will not be possible to sustain the RDoC effort. This article seeks to outline the relationship between RDoC and NIMH’s ongoing support for broad-based basic research, from genetics to behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Publishing, Arlington, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes JJ, Dean AJ, Nandam LS, O’Connell RG, Bellgrove MA (2011) The molecular genetics of executive function: role of monoamine system genes. Biol Psychiatry 69:e127–143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bilder RM, Howe A, Novak N, Sabb FW, Parker DS (2011) The genetics of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia: a phenomic perspective. Trends Cogn Sci 15:428–435

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Congdon E, Poldrack RA, Freimer NB (2010) Neurocognitive phenotypes and genetic dissection of disorders of brain and behavior. Neuron 68:218–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Consortium C-DGotPG (Cross-Disorder Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium) (2013) Identification of risk loci with shared effects on five major psychiatric disorders: a genome-wide analysis. Lancet 381(9875):1371–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gershon ES, Goldin LR (1986) Clinical methods in psychiatric genetics. I. Robustness of genetic marker investigative strategies. Acta Psychiatr Scand 74:113–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gottesman II, Gould TD (2003) The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. Am J Psychiatry 160:636–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green AE, Munafo MR, DeYoung CG, Fossella JA, Fan J, Gray JR (2008) Using genetic data in cognitive neuroscience: from growing pains to genuine insights. Nat Rev Neurosci 9:710–720

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Insel TR (2007) From animal models to model animals. Biol Psychiatry 62:1337–1339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Insel T (2010) NIMH basic science support: busting myths. In: NIMH director’s blog. http://www.nimh.nih.gov/about/director/2010/nimh-basic-science-support-busting-myths.shtml. Accessed 27 Sept 2013

  • MacCorquodale K, Meehl PE (1948) On a distinction between hypothetical constructs and intervening variables. Psychol Rev 55:95–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milad MR, Rauch SL, Pitman RK, Quirk GJ (2006) Fear extinction in rats: implications for human brain imaging and anxiety disorders. Biol Psychol 73:61–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Plomin R, Haworth CM, Davis OS (2009) Common disorders are quantitative traits. Nat Rev Genet 10:872–878

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders SJ, Murtha MT, Gupta AR, Murdoch JD, Raubeson MJ, Willsey AJ, Ercan-Sencicek AG, DiLullo NM, Parikshak NN, Stein JL, Walker MF, Ober GT, Teran NA, Song Y, El-Fishawy P, Murtha RC, Choi M, Overton JD, Bjornson RD, Carriero NJ, Meyer KA, Bilguvar K, Mane SM, Sestan N, Lifton RP, Gunel M, Roeder K, Geschwind DH, Devlin B, State MW (2012) De novo mutations revealed by whole-exome sequencing are strongly associated with autism. Nature 485:237–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shin LM, Liberzon I (2010) The neurocircuitry of fear, stress, and anxiety disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 35:169–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Andrea Beckel-Mitchener, Bruce Cuthbert, Michael Kozak, Thomas Lehner, Doug Meinecke, David Panchision, and Lois Winsky for helpful input and discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. National Institute of Mental Health, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health & Human Services, Bethesda, MD, USA

    Janine M. Simmons & Kevin J. Quinn

Authors
  1. Janine M. Simmons
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kevin J. Quinn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin J. Quinn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Simmons, J.M., Quinn, K.J. The NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Project: implications for genetics research. Mamm Genome 25, 23–31 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-013-9476-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00335-013-9476-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation