Skip to main content
Log in

Early versus delayed bronchial artery embolization for non-massive hemoptysis

  • Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

The aims of this study were to compare clinical outcomes of early versus delayed bronchial artery embolization (BAE) for non-massive hemoptysis and to investigate predictors of recurrent hemoptysis.

Methods

From March 2018 to February 2021, 138 consecutive patients (age, 65.5 ± 12.4 years; male, 67.4%) with non-massive hemoptysis underwent BAE. The enrolled patients were divided into an early embolization (EE) group (within the first 24 h, n = 79) and a delayed embolization (DE) group (n = 59).

Results

The time to embolization ranged between 0 and 15 days and was shorter in the EE group (0.47 ± 0.5 days) than in the DE group (4.02 ± 2.8 days, p < 0.001). The in-hospital clinical outcomes were not different between the two groups, except for hospital stay and post-embolization hospital stay. The recurrence-free survival in the EE group was significantly better than that in the DE group (p = 0.018). The time to embolization (hazard ratio (HR), 1.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.04–1.42; p = 0.015) and aspergilloma (HR, 6.89; 95% CI, 2.08–22.86; p = 0.002) were predictive factors for recurrent hemoptysis.

Conclusions

BAE is an effective and safe treatment modality for non-massive hemoptysis. An early interventional strategy should be considered in patients presenting with non-massive hemoptysis to reduce the length of hospital stay and early recurrence. A delayed time to embolization and the presence of aspergilloma were independent risk factors for recurrent hemoptysis.

Key Points

• Bronchial artery embolization afforded good clinical improvement for treating non-massive hemoptysis without significant complications.

• An early interventional strategy should be considered in patients presenting with non-massive hemoptysis to reduce the length of hospital stay and early recurrence.

• A delayed time to embolization and the presence of aspergilloma were independent risk factors for recurrent hemoptysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACR AC:

American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria

BAE:

Bronchial artery embolization

CI:

Confidence interval

DE:

Delayed embolization

EE:

Early embolization

HR:

Hazard ratio

NBSC:

Non-bronchial systemic collateral

PVA:

Polyvinyl alcohol

RCT:

Randomized controlled trial

VIF:

Variance inflation factor

References

  1. Panda A, Bhalla AS, Goyal A (2017) Bronchial artery embolization in hemoptysis: a systematic review. Diagn Interv Radiol 23:307–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Burke CT, Mauro MA (2004) Bronchial artery embolization. Semin Intervent Radiol 21:43–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Angle JF, Siddiqi NH, Wallace MJ et al (2010) Quality improvement guidelines for percutaneous transcatheter embolization: Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21:1479–1486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Woo S, Yoon CJ, Chung JW et al (2013) Bronchial artery embolization to control hemoptysis: comparison of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate and polyvinyl alcohol particles. Radiology 269:594–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fartoukh M, Demoule A, Sanchez O et al (2021) Randomised trial of first-line bronchial artery embolisation for non-severe haemoptysis of mild abundance. BMJ Open Respir Res 8:e000949. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2021-000949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Expert Panel on Thoracic I, Olsen KM, Manouchehr-Pour S et al (2020) ACR Appropriateness criteria(R) hemoptysis. J Am Coll Radiol 17:S148–S159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hwang JH, Kim JH, Park S, Lee KH, Park SH (2021) Feasibility and outcomes of bronchial artery embolization in patients with non-massive hemoptysis. Respir Res 22:221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Almeida J, Leal C, Figueiredo L (2020) Evaluation of the bronchial arteries: normal findings, hypertrophy and embolization in patients with hemoptysis. Insights Imaging 11:70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yoon W, Kim JK, Kim YH, Chung TW, Kang HK (2002) Bronchial and nonbronchial systemic artery embolization for life-threatening hemoptysis: a comprehensive review. Radiographics 22:1395–1409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dorji K, Hongsakul K, Jutidamrongphan W, Oofuvong M, Geater S (2021) Bronchial artery embolization in life-threatening hemoptysis: outcome and predictive factors. J Belg Soc Radiol 105:5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fu Z, Li X, Cai F et al (2021) Microspheres present comparable efficacy and safety profiles compared with polyvinyl alcohol for bronchial artery embolization treatment in hemoptysis patients. J Transl Med 19:422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Garcia-Olive I, Sanz-Santos J, Centeno C et al (2014) Predictors of recanalization in patients with life-threatening hemoptysis requiring artery embolization. Arch Bronconeumol 50:51–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Prutsky G, Domecq JP, Salazar CA, Accinelli R (2016) Antifibrinolytic therapy to reduce haemoptysis from any cause. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD008711

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dweik RA, Stoller JK (1999) Role of bronchoscopy in massive hemoptysis. Clin Chest Med 20:89–105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee HN, Park HS, Hyun D et al (2021) Combined therapy with bronchial artery embolization and tranexamic acid for hemoptysis. Acta Radiol 62:610–618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Numan F, Cantasdemir M, Ozbayrak M et al (2008) Posttraumatic nonischemic priapism treated with autologous blood clot embolization. J Sex Med 5:173–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chun JY, Belli AM (2010) Immediate and long-term outcomes of bronchial and non-bronchial systemic artery embolisation for the management of haemoptysis. Eur Radiol 20:558–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. van den Heuvel MM, Els Z, Koegelenberg CF, Naidu KM, Bolliger CT, Diacon AH (2007) Risk factors for recurrence of haemoptysis following bronchial artery embolisation for life-threatening haemoptysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 11:909–914

    Google Scholar 

  19. Le HY, Le VN, Pham NH, Phung AT, Nguyen TT, Do Q (2020) Value of multidetector computed tomography angiography before bronchial artery embolization in hemoptysis management and early recurrence prediction: a prospective study. BMC Pulm Med 20:231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hahn S, Kim YJ, Kwon W, Cha SW, Lee WY (2010) Comparison of the effectiveness of embolic agents for bronchial artery embolization: gelfoam versus polyvinyl alcohol. Korean J Radiol 11:542–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund. This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyoung Nam Lee.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Hyoung Nam Lee.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.

Statistics and biometry

“Clinical Trial Center at Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan Hospital” kindly provided statistical advice for this manuscript.

Informed consent

Institutional review boards of all collaborating institutions approved this retrospective study and waived written informed consent for use of clinical and imaging data. Written informed consent for interventional procedures was obtained from all patients.

Ethical approval

Institutional review board approval was obtained.

Methodology

• retrospective

• observational

• performed at four institutions

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, SJ., Lee, S., Lee, H.N. et al. Early versus delayed bronchial artery embolization for non-massive hemoptysis. Eur Radiol 33, 116–124 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08993-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-08993-z

Keywords

Navigation