Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic reliability of elastography in thyroid nodules reported as indeterminate at prior fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC): a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis

  • Ultrasound
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the diagnostic yields of elastography in thyroid nodules reported as indeterminate in FNAC according to guidelines.

Methods

Databases of Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central were searched till 31 October 2019. Two different reviewers check the studies and extracted the data. The diagnostic accuracy and yield were quantitatively synthesized using Bayesian bivariate model in R.

Results

Twenty studies with 1734 indeterminate thyroid nodules undergoing elastography were included. The summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity were 0.766 (95% credible interval (CrI), 0.686–0.835) and 0.867 (95% CrI, 0.780–0.931), respectively. The summary estimate for diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 25.9 (95% CrI, 12.8–46.2). Summary receiver operating characteristic plots for elastography showed a right-diagonal curvilinear relationship, suggesting a trade-off between sensitivity and specificity, and the estimate of area under curve (AUC) was 0.743. The summary estimates for positive and negative likelihood ratios were 6.6 (95% CrI, 4.2–11.3) and 0.27 (95% CrI, 0.21–0.36), respectively.

Conclusions

Elastography had fair diagnostic yields in indeterminate thyroid nodules. Shear wave elastography and strain ratio elastography could be more efficient in diagnosis and should evolve in the next years while combing elastography with ultrasound would contribute more to sensitivity and specificity currently.

Key Points

• Elastography has fair diagnostic yields in indeterminate thyroid nodules.

• Shear wave elastography and strain ratio elastography are more efficient than real-time elastography.

• Combining elastography and other ultrasound techniques improves evaluation of indeterminate thyroid nodules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AUC:

Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve

DIC:

Deviance information criterion

DOR:

Diagnostic odds ratio

FNAC:

Fine-needle aspiration cytology

MCMC:

Markov chain Monte Carlo

NLR:

Negative likelihood ratio

PLR:

Positive likelihood ratio

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

QUADAS-2:

Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2

RD:

Risk difference

RTE:

Real-time elastography

SROC:

Summary receiver operating characteristic

SWE:

Shear wave elastography

US:

Ultrasound

References

  1. Bongiovanni M, Spitale A, Faquin WC, Mazzucchelli L, Baloch ZW (2012) The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: a meta-analysis. Acta Cytol 56:333–339

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gharib H, Papini E, Paschke R et al (2010) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Associazione Medici Endocrinologi, and European Thyroid Association medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules: executive summary of recommendations. J Endocrinol Invest 33:51–56

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Perros P, Boelaert K, Colley S et al (2014) Guidelines for the management of thyroid cancer. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 81(Suppl 1):1–122

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cibas ES, Ali SZ (2009) The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid 19:1159–1165

    Google Scholar 

  5. Alexander EK, Kennedy GC, Baloch ZW et al (2012) Preoperative diagnosis of benign thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology. N Engl J Med 367:705–715

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC et al (2016) 2015 American Thyroid Association Management Guidelines for Adult Patients with Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 26:1–133

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Nayar R, Ivanovic M (2009) The indeterminate thyroid fine-needle aspiration: experience from an academic center using terminology similar to that proposed in the 2007 National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Cancer 117:195–202

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garra BS (2011) Elastography: current status, future prospects, and making it work for you. Ultrasound Q 27:177–186

    Google Scholar 

  9. Trimboli P, Treglia G, Sadeghi R, Romanelli F, Giovanella L (2015) Reliability of real-time elastography to diagnose thyroid nodules previously read at FNAC as indeterminate: a meta-analysis. Endocrine 50:335–343

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Samir AE, Dhyani M, Anvari A et al (2015) Shear-wave elastography for the preoperative risk stratification of follicular-patterned lesions of the thyroid: diagnostic accuracy and optimal measurement plane. Radiology 277:565–573

    Google Scholar 

  11. McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD et al (2018) Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies: the PRISMA-DTA Statement. JAMA 319:388–396

    Google Scholar 

  12. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stijnen T, Hamza TH, Ozdemir P (2010) Random effects meta-analysis of event outcome in the framework of the generalized linear mixed model with applications in sparse data. Stat Med 29:3046–3067

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guo J, Riebler A, Rue H (2017) Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test studies with interpretable priors. Stat Med 36:3039–3058

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rago T, Scutari M, Santini F et al (2010) Real-time elastosonography: useful tool for refining the presurgical diagnosis in thyroid nodules with indeterminate or nondiagnostic cytology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95:5274–5280

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lippolis PV, Tognini S, Materazzi G et al (2011) Is elastography actually useful in the presurgical selection of thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:E1826–E1830

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Unluturk U, Erdogan MF, Demir O, Gullu S, Baskal N (2012) Ultrasound elastography is not superior to grayscale ultrasound in predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules. Thyroid 22:1031–1038

    Google Scholar 

  18. Trimboli P, Guglielmi R, Monti S et al (2012) Ultrasound sensitivity for thyroid malignancy is increased by real-time elastography: a prospective multicenter study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:4524–4530

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ragazzoni F, Deandrea M, Mormile A et al (2012) High diagnostic accuracy and interobserver reliability of real-time elastography in the evaluation of thyroid nodules. Ultrasound Med Biol 38:1154–1162

    Google Scholar 

  20. Russ G, Royer B, Bigorgne C, Rouxel A, Bienvenu-Perrard M, Leenhardt L (2013) Prospective evaluation of thyroid imaging reporting and data system on 4550 nodules with and without elastography. Eur J Endocrinol 168:649–655

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mohey N, Hassan TA, Abdel-Baki S (2013) Role of combined grey scale US and US tissue elastography in differentiating solid thyroid nodules. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 44:505–512

  22. Garino F, Deandrea M, Motta M et al (2015) Diagnostic performance of elastography in cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules. Endocrine 49:175–183

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gay S, Schiaffino S, Santamorena G et al (2018) Role of strain elastography and shear-wave elastography in a multiparametric clinical approach to indeterminate cytology thyroid nodules. Med Sci Monit 24:6273–6279

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Azizi G, Keller JM, Mayo ML et al (2018) Shear wave elastography and Afirma gene expression classifier in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology: a comparison study. Endocrine 59:573–584

    CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Bardet S, Ciappuccini R, Pellot-Barakat C et al (2017) Shear wave elastography in thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology: results of a prospective bicentric study. Thyroid 27:1441–1449

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Cantisani V, Maceroni P, D'Andrea V et al (2016) Strain ratio ultrasound elastography increases the accuracy of colour-Doppler ultrasound in the evaluation of Thy-3 nodules. A bi-centre university experience. Eur Radiol 26:1441–1449

    Google Scholar 

  27. Cappelli C, Pirola I, Gandossi E et al (2012) Real-time elastography: a useful tool for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules with nondiagnostic cytologic findings. J Ultrasound Med 31:1777–1782

    Google Scholar 

  28. Giusti M, Massa B, Balestra M et al (2017) Retrospective cytological evaluation of indeterminate thyroid nodules according to the British Thyroid Association 2014 classification and comparison of clinical evaluation and outcomes. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B 18:555–566

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Rago T, Santini F, Scutari M, Pinchera A, Vitti P (2007) Elastography: new developments in ultrasound for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:2917–2922

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rago T, Scutari M, Loiacono V et al (2017) Low elasticity of thyroid nodules on ultrasound elastography is correlated with malignancy, degree of fibrosis, and high expression of galectin-3 and fibronectin-1. Thyroid 27:103–110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Sengul D, Sengul I, Van Slycke S (2019) Risk stratification of the thyroid nodule with Bethesda indeterminate cytology, category III, IV, V on the one surgeon-performed US-guided fine-needle aspiration with 27-gauge needle, verified by histopathology of thyroidectomy: the additional value of one surgeon-performed elastography. Acta Chir Belg 119:38–46

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yang BR, Kim EK, Moon HJ, Yoon JH, Park VY, Kwak JY (2018) Qualitative and semiquantitative elastography for the diagnosis of intermediate suspicious thyroid nodules based on the 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines. J Ultrasound Med 37:1007–1014

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Stoian D, Borcan F, Petre I et al (2019) Strain elastography as a valuable diagnosis tool in intermediate cytology (Bethesda III) thyroid nodules. Diagnostics (Basel) 9:119

  34. Baloch Z, LiVolsi VA, Jain P et al (2003) Role of repeat fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) in the management of thyroid nodules. Diagn Cytopathol 29:203–206

    Google Scholar 

  35. Baloch ZW, Fleisher S, LiVolsi VA, Gupta PK (2002) Diagnosis of “follicular neoplasm”: a gray zone in thyroid fine-needle aspiration cytology. Diagn Cytopathol 26:41–44

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pandey NN, Pradhan GS, Manchanda A, Garg A (2017) Diagnostic value of acoustic radiation force impulse quantification in the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Ultrason Imaging 39:326–336

    Google Scholar 

  37. Szczepanek-Parulska E, Wolinski K, Stangierski A, Gurgul E, Ruchala M (2014) Biochemical and ultrasonographic parameters influencing thyroid nodules elasticity. Endocrine 47:519–527

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Andrioli M, Persani L (2014) Elastographic techniques of thyroid gland: current status. Endocrine 46:455–461

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Choi SH, Kim EK, Kwak JY, Kim MJ, Son EJ (2010) Interobserver and intraobserver variations in ultrasound assessment of thyroid nodules. Thyroid 20:167–172

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sigrist RMS, Liau J, Kaffas AE, Chammas MC, Willmann JK (2017) Ultrasound elastography: review of techniques and clinical applications. Theranostics 7:1303–1329

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wojtaszek-Nowicka M, Slowinska-Klencka D, Sporny S et al (2017) The efficiency of elastography in the diagnostics of follicular lesions and nodules with an unequivocal FNA result. Endokrynol Pol 68:610–622

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Săftoiu A, Gilja OH, Sidhu PS et al (2019) The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations for the clinical practice of elastography in non-hepatic applications: update 2018. Ultraschall Med 40:425–453

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cantisani V, Grazhdani H, Drakonaki E et al (2015) Strain US elastography for the characterization of thyroid nodules: advantages and limitation. Int J Endocrinol 2015:908575

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Asteria C, Giovanardi A, Pizzocaro A et al (2008) US-elastography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Thyroid 18:523–531

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This systematic review and meta-analysis was supported by the 1.3.5 Project for Disciplines of Excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anping Su.

Ethics declarations

Guarantor

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Yuxuan Qiu.

Conflict of interest

The authors of this manuscript declare no conflicts of interest.

Statistics and biometry

Dr. Yuxuan Qiu was responsible for statistical analysis.

Informed consent

Approval was not required because this meta-analysis was based on former studies.

Ethical approval

This meta-analysis was based on former studies, and the ethical approval was not required in this meta-analysis.

Methodology

• Meta-analysis for diagnostic tests

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 24 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qiu, Y., Xing, Z., Liu, J. et al. Diagnostic reliability of elastography in thyroid nodules reported as indeterminate at prior fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC): a systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 30, 6624–6634 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07023-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-020-07023-0

Keywords

Navigation