Skip to main content
Log in

Validation and reappraisal of the assessment for retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization score for unresectable non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis b virus-endemic region

  • Oncology
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To validate and reappraise the Assessment for Retreatment with Transarterial chemoembolization (ART) score comprising three parameters (>25 % increase in aspartate aminotransferase [AST], increase in Child-Pugh score and tumour response), determined prior to subsequent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

Methods

Enrolled patients were diagnosed with unresectable non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma and underwent multiple TACEs between June 2006 and December 2007 (N = 153). Subgroupings were classified according to the established cut-off (≤1.5 vs. ≥2.5). Survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier curve was performed.

Results

The original ART score dichotomized patients according to their overall survival (P = 0.004). We found several patients who actually survived longer than others were assigned to a poor prognostic group due to the AST component. Parameter estimates for AST obtained from our analysis were much lower than the original version (0.5 vs. 2.1). We adjusted the component according to the value of our parameter estimates, and patients with >25 % AST increase received 1.0 point. After this modification, patients assigned to the favourable prognostic group were more likely to have a better survival outcome (median 23.9 vs. 12.2 months, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

In hepatitis B virus-endemic regions, the ART score is valid and can better predict post-TACE survival after the AST component is modified.

Key Points

The ART score was validated in a HBV-endemic region.

The modified ART score improved prognostic performance by reappraising the AST component.

The modified ART score helps physicians make decisions for further TACE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HCC:

hepatocellular carcinoma

BCLC:

Barcelona clinic liver cancer

TACE:

transarterial chemoembolization

ART:

Assessment for retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization

AST:

aspartate aminotransferase

OS:

overall survival

EASL:

European Association for the Study of Liver

HBV:

hepatitis B virus

CT:

computed tomography

AFP:

alpha-fetoprotein

HR:

hazard ratio

NRI:

net reclassification improvement

CI:

confidence interval

SD:

standard deviation

DEB:

drug-eluting bead

References

  1. Bolondi L, Burroughs A, Dufour JF, Galle PR, Mazzaferro V, Piscaglia F et al (2012) Heterogeneity of patients with intermediate (BCLC B) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: proposal for a subclassification to facilitate treatment decisions. Semin Liver Dis 32:348–359

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. de Lope CR, Tremosini S, Forner A, Reig M, Bruix J (2012) Management of HCC. J Hepatol 56:S75–S87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruix J, Sherman M (2011) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 53:1020–1022

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Dufour JF, Bargellini I, De Maria N, De Simone P, Goulis I, Marinho RT (2013) Intermediate hepatocellular carcinoma: current treatments and future perspectives. Ann Oncol 24:ii24–ii29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim do Y, Han KH (2012) How to improve treatment outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma of intermediate and advanced stage. Dig Dis 30:598–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Llovet JM, Bru C, Bruix J (1999) Prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma: the BCLC staging classification. Semin Liver Dis 19:329–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruix J, Sherman M (2005) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 42:1208–1236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Takayasu K (2013) Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: recent progression and perspective. Oncology 84:28–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng AL, Amarapurkar D, Chao Y, Chen PJ, Geschwind JF, Goh KL et al (2014) Re-evaluating transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: consensus recommendations and review by an international expert panel. Liver Int 34:174–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sieghart W, Hucke F, Pinter M, Graziadei I, Vogel W, Muller C et al (2013) The ART of decision making: retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 57:2261–2273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hucke F, Sieghart W, Pinter M, Graziadei I, Vogel W, Muller C et al (2014) The ART-strategy: Sequential assessment of the ART score predicts outcome of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma re-treated with TACE. J Hepatol 60:118–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Contal C, O'Quigley J (1999) An application of changepoint methods in studying the effect of age on survival in breast cancer. Comput Stat Data Anal 30:253–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cook NR, Ridker PM (2009) Advances in measuring the effect of individual predictors of cardiovascular risk: the role of reclassification measures. Ann Intern Med 150:795–802

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Sobin LH, Gospodarowicz MK, Wittekind C (2011) TNM classification of malignant tumours, John Wiley & Sons

  15. Williams B, Mandrekar J, Mandrekar S, Cha S, Furth A (2006) Technical report series No. 79, finding optimal cutpoints for continuous covariates with binary and time-to-event outcomes, department of health sciences research. Mayo Clinic, Rochester

    Google Scholar 

  16. Llovet JM, Burroughs A, Bruix J (2003) Hepatocellular carcinoma. Lancet 362:1907–1917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Brechot C, Gozuacik D, Murakami Y, Paterlini-Brechot P (2000) Molecular bases for the development of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Semin Cancer Biol 10:211–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The scientific guarantor of this publication is Dr. Han Chu Lee. The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article. The authors state that this work has not received any funding. One of the authors (Jung Bok Lee) has significant statistical expertise. Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.

Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. Methodology: retrospective, diagnostic or prognostic study, performed at one institution.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han Chu Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest and source of funding

None to declare.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Table 1

(DOC 44 kb)

Table 2

(DOC 45 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ha, Y., Lee, J.B., Shim, J.H. et al. Validation and reappraisal of the assessment for retreatment with transarterial chemoembolization score for unresectable non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma in a hepatitis b virus-endemic region. Eur Radiol 26, 3510–3518 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4185-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-015-4185-2

Keywords

Navigation