Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of therapeutic response in ankylosing spondylitis patients undergoing anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging

  • Magnetic Resonance
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Multifocal musculoskeletal inflammation is common in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and is effectively treated by expensive anti-TNF (tumour necrosis factor) therapy. This study evaluated assessment of response by whole-body (WB) MRI compared with clinical assessment in AS patients during etanercept therapy.

Methods

Ten patients with AS underwent a 12-month therapy with etanercept. Clinical markers were monitored [Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) and C-reactive protein (CRP)] and patients underwent WBMRI (1.5 T, STIR and T1-weighted) at three different time points (0, 26 and 52 weeks). WBMRI was evaluated and correlated with clinical scores.

Results

The BASDAI index decreased under therapy from 5.5 ± 0.5 (week 0) to 1.7 ± 0.5 (week 52, P < 0.05). CRP declined from 15.7 ± 2.2 mg/dl (week 0) to 0.9 ± 0.9 mg/dl (week 52, P < 0.05). In WBMRI, the sum of all lesions showed a significant decrease from week 0 (38.9 ± 3.4) to week 52 (2.2 ± 0.9, 94.3 % reduction). WBMRI detected more areas of synovitis and enthesitis than clinical examination alone.

Conclusions

AS activity significantly decreased under etanercept therapy, which was proven by clinical examination and WBMRI. WBMRI detected more inflammatory lesions than clinical examination alone. The results suggest that WBMRI improves the detection of inflammatory changes and the assessment of their course under therapy.

Key Points

• Multifocal musculoskeletal inflammation in AS is effectively treated by anti-TNF therapy.

• Inflammatory lesions can be assessed by clinical examination and whole-body MRI.

• AS activity significantly decreased under therapy as shown by WBMRI/clinical examination.

• WBMRI detected more inflammatory lesions than clinical examination alone.

• WBMRI improves detection of inflammatory changes and may help evaluation of therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AS:

Ankylosing spondylitis

anti-TNF:

Anti-tumour necrosis factor

ASAS:

Assessment in Spondyloarthritis International Society

BASDAI:

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index

BASFI:

Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index

BME:

Bone marrow oedema

CIL:

Corner inflammatory lesion

CRP:

C-reactive protein

ESR:

Erythrocyte sedimentation rate

ESSG:

European Spondyloarthropathy Study Group

FIL:

Facet joint inflammatory lesion

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

LIL:

Lateral inflammatory lesion

NIL:

Non-corner inflammatory lesion

NSAID:

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

PIL:

Posterior element inflammatory lesion

WBMRI:

Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging

References

  1. Marzo-Ortega H, McGonagle D, O’Connor P, Hensor EM, Bennett AN, Green MJ (2009) Baseline and 1-year magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joint and lumbar spine in very early inflammatory back pain. Relationship between symptoms, HLA-B27 and disease extent and persistence. Ann Rheum Dis 68:1721–1727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Boonen A, Chorus A, Midema H, van der Heijde D, van der Tempel H, van der Linden S (2001) Employment, work disability and work days lost in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a cross sectional study of Dutch patients. Ann Rheum Dis 60:353–358

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A (1984) Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for ankylosing spondylitis. A proposal for modification of the New York criteria. Arthritis Rheum 27:361–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mau W, Zeidler H, Mau R, Majewski A, Freyschmidt J, Stangel W (1988) Clinical features and prognosis of patients with possible ankylosing spondylitis. Results of a 10-year followup. J Rheumatol 15:1109–1114

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Braun J, Bollow M, Remlinger G et al (1998) Prevalence of spondylarthropathies in HLA-B27 positive and negative blood donors. Arthritis Rheum 41:58–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ory PA, Gladman DD, Mease PJ (2005) Psoriatic arthritis and imaging. Ann Rheum Dis 64:ii55–ii57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bollow M, Fischer T, Reisshauer H et al (2000) Quantitative analyses of sacroiliac biopsies in spondyloarthropathies: T cells and macrophages predominate in early and active sacroiliitis—cellularity correlates with the degree of enhancement detected by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Rheum Dis 59:135–140

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bennett AN, McGonagle D, O’Connor P, Hensor EM, Sivera F, Coates LC (2008) Severity of baseline magnetic resonance imaging-evident sacroiliitis and HLA-B27 status in early inflammatory back pain predict radiographically evident ankylosing spondylitis at eight years. Arthritis Rheum 58:3413–3418

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rudwaleit M, van der Heijde D, Landewe R, Listing J, Akkoc N, Brandt J (2009) The development of Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society classification criteria for axial spondyloarthritis (part II): validation and final selection. Ann Rheum Dis 68:777–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Weber U, Pfirrmann CW, Kissling RO, Hodler J, Zanetti M (2007) Whole body MR imaging ankylosing spondylitis: a descriptive pilot study in patients with suspected early and active confirmed ankylosing spondylitis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8:20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weckbach S (2009) Whole-body MR imaging for patients with rheumatism. Eur J Radiol 70:431–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wanders A, Heijde D, Landewe R, Behier JM, Calin A, Olivieri I (2005) Nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drugs reduce radiographic progression in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a randomized clinical trial. Arthritis Rheum 52:1756–1765

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (2008) Adalimumab, Etanercept and Infliximab for Ankylosing Spondylitis. NICE, London. Available via http://guidance.nice.org.uk/TA143

  14. Zochling J, van der Heijde D, Burgos-Vargas R, Collantes E, Davis JC Jr, Dijkmans B (2006) ASAS/EULAR recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 65:442–452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Braun J, Deodhar A, Dijkmans B et al (2008) Efficacy and safety of infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis over a two-year period. Arthritis Rheum 59:1270–1278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Dijkmans B, Emery P, Hakala M et al (2009) Etanercept in the longterm treatment of patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 36:1256–1264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Heijde D, Schiff MH, Sieper J et al (2009) Adalimumab effectiveness for the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis is maintained for up to 2 years: long-term results from the ATLAS trial. Ann Rheum Dis 68:922–929

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Calin A, Garrel S, Whitelock H et al (1994) A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath ankylosing spondylitis functional index. J Rheumatol 21:2281–2285

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Garrett S, Ienkinson T, Kennedy G, Whitelock H, Gaisford P, Calin A (1994) A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath ankylosing spondylitis disease activity index. J Rheumatol 21:2286–2291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Van der Heijde D, Dougados M, Davis J et al (2005) Assessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Working Group/Spondylitis Association of America recommendation for conducting clinical trials in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 52:386–394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Van der Heijde D, Calin A, Dougados M et al (1999) Selection of instruments in the core set for DC-ART, SMARD, physical therapy and clinical record keeping in ankylosing spondylitis: progress report of the ASAS Working Group. J Rheumatol 26:951–954

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sheehan NJ, Slavin BM, Donovan MP, Mount JN, Mathews JA (1986) Lack of correlation between clinical disease activity and erythrocyte sedimentation rate, acute phase proteins or protease inhibitors in ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Rheumatol 25:171–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lin Z, Gu J, He P et al (2001) Multicenter validation of the value of BASFI and BASDAI in Chinese ankylosing spondylitis and undifferentiated spondyloarthropathy patients. Rheumatol Int 31:233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Barkham N, Keen HI, Coates LC et al (2009) Clinical and imaging efficacy of infliximab in HLA-B27-positive patients with magnetic resonance imaging-determined early sacroiliitis. Arthritis Rheum 60:946–954

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Braun J, Landewe R, Hermann KG et al (2006) Major reduction in spinal inflammation in patients with ankylosing spondylitis after treatment with infliximab: results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled magnetic resonance imaging study. Arthritis Rheum 54:1646–1652

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Althoff CE, Appel H, Rudwaleit M et al (2007) Whole-body MRI as a new screening tool for detecting axial and peripheral manifestations of spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 66:983–985

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Appel H, Hermann KG, Althoff CE, Rudwaleit M, Sieper J (2007) Whole-body magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of widespread inflammatory lesions in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis before and after 1 year of treatment with infliximab. J Rheumatol 34:2497–2498

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Calin A, Porta J, Fries JF, Schurmann DJ (2009) Clinical history as a screening test for ankylosing spondylitis. JAMA 237:2613–2614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rudwaleit M, Jurik AG, Hermann KG et al (2009) Defining active sacroiliitis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for classification of axial spondyloarthritis: a consensual approach by the ASAS/OMERACT MRI group. Ann Rheum Dis 68:1520–1527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dougados M, van der Linden S, Juhlin R et al (1991) The European Spondylarthropathy Study Group preliminary criteria for the classification of spondylarthropathy. Arthritis Rheum 34:1218–1227

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hermann KG, Braun J, Fischer T, Reisshauer H, Bollow M (2004) Magnetic resonance tomography of sacroiliitis: anatomy, histological pathology, MR-morphology, and grading]. Radiologe 44:217–228

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Maksymowych WP, Crowther SM, Dhillon SS, Conner-Spady B, Lambert RG (2010) Systematic assessment of inflammation by magnetic resonance imaging in the posterior elements of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Care Res 62:4–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bochkova AG, Levshakova AV, Bunchuk NV, Braun J (2010) Spinal inflammation lesions as detected by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with early ankylosing spondylitis are more often observed in posterior structures of the spine. Rheumatology 49:749–755

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Song IH, Hermann K, Haibel H et al (2011) Effects of etanercept versus sulfalazine in early axial spondyloarthritis on active inflammatory lesions as detected by whole-body MRI (ESTHER): a 48-week randomised controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis 70:590–596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dougados M, Combe B, Braun J et al (2010) A randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of etanercept in adults with refractory heel enthesitis in spondyloarthritis: the HEEL trial. Ann Rheum Dis 69:1430–1435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. McGonagle D, Marzo-Ortega H, O’Connor P et al (2002) Histological assessment of the early enthesitis lesion in spondyloarthropathy. Ann Rheum Dis 61:534–537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Maksymowych WP (2000) Ankylosing spondylitis—at the interface of bone and cartilage. J Rheumatol 27:2295–2301

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Emery P, Breedveld FC, Hall S et al (2008) Comparison of methotrexate monotherapy with a combination of methotrexate and etanercept in active, early, moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (COMET): a randomised, double-blind, parallel treatment trial. Lancet 372:375–382

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sieper J, Appel H, Braun J, Rudwaleit M (2008) Critical appraisal of assessment of structural damage in ankylosing spondylitis: implications for treatment outcomes. Arthritis Rheum 58:649–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Rudwaleit M, Listing J, Brandt J, Sieper J (2004) Prediction of a major clinical response (BASDAI 50) to tumour necrosis factor alpha blockers in ankylosing spondylitis. Ann Rheum Dis 63:665–670

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Rudwaleit M, Claudepierre P, Wordsworth P et al (2009) Effectiveness, safety, and predictors of good clinical response in 1250 patients treated with adalimumab for active ankylosing spondylitis. J Rheumatol 36:801–808

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

As a specific source of funding for this study, we want to disclose an unrestricted fund from Pfizer GmbH Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martina Karpitschka.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karpitschka, M., Godau-Kellner, P., Kellner, H. et al. Assessment of therapeutic response in ankylosing spondylitis patients undergoing anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy by whole-body magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 23, 1773–1784 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2794-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-2794-1

Keywords

Navigation