Abstract
Objectives
To investigate the diagnostic accuracy, through quantitative analysis, of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), using a microbubble contrast agent, in the differentiation of thyroid nodules.
Methods
This prospective study enrolled 46 patients with solitary, scintigraphically non-functional thyroid nodules. These patients were scheduled for surgery and underwent preoperative CEUS with pulse-inversion harmonic imaging after intravenous microbubble contrast medium administration. Using histology as a standard of reference, time–intensity curves of benign and malignant nodules were compared by means of peak enhancement and wash-out enhancement relative to the baseline intensity using a mixed model ANOVA. ROC analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic accuracy in the differentiation of benign and malignant nodules on CEUS.
Results
The complete CEUS data of 42 patients (31/42 [73.8%] benign and 11/42 [26.2%] malignant nodules) revealed a significant difference (P < 0.001) in enhancement between benign and malignant nodules. Furthermore, based on ROC analysis, CEUS demonstrated sensitivity of 76.9%, specificity of 84.8% and accuracy of 82.6%.
Conclusions
Quantitative analysis of CEUS using a microbubble contrast agent allows the differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules and may potentially serve, in addition to grey-scale and Doppler ultrasound, as an adjunctive tool in the assessment of patients with thyroid nodules.
Key Points
• Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) helps differentiate between benign and malignant thyroid nodules.
• Quantitative CEUS analysis yields sensitivity of 76.9% and specificity of 84.8%.
• CEUS may be a potentially useful adjunct in assessing thyroid nodules.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mortensen JD, Woolner LB, Bennett WA (1955) Gross and microscopic findings in clinically normal thyroid glands. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 15:1270-1280
Gharib H, Papini E, Paschke R et al; AACE/AME/ETA Task Force on Thyroid Nodules (2010) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, Associazione Medici Endocrinologi, and European Thyroid Association medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of thyroid nodules: Executive Summary of recommendations. J Endocrinol Invest 33:287-291
Hegedüs L (2004) Clinical practice. The thyroid nodule. N Engl J Med 351:1764-1771
Frates MC, Benson CB, Charboneau JW et al; Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound (2005) Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound. Management of thyroid nodules detected at US: Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference statement. Radiology 237:794-800
Moon WJ, Jung SL, Lee JH et al; Thyroid Study Group, Korean Society of Neuro- and Head and Neck Radiology (2008) Benign and malignant thyroid nodules: US differentiation—multicenter retrospective study. Radiology 247:762-770
Hoang JK, Lee WK, Lee M, Johnson D, Farrell S (2007) US Features of thyroid malignancy: pearls and pitfalls. Radiographics 27:847-860
Bakhshaee M, Davoudi Y, Mehrabi M et al (2008) Vascular pattern and spectral parameters of power Doppler ultrasound as predictors of malignancy risk in thyroid nodules. Laryngoscope 118:2182-2186
Frates MC, Benson CB, Doubilet PM, Cibas ES, Marqusee E (2003) Can color Doppler sonography aid in the prediction of malignancy of thyroid nodules? J Ultrasound Med 22:127-131
Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Kim MJ, Son EJ, Kim EK (2010) Can vascularity at power Doppler US help predict thyroid malignancy? Radiology 255:260-269
Eisenbrey JR, Forsberg F (2010) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for molecular imaging of angiogenesis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 37 [Suppl 1]:138-146
Fleischer AC, Niermann KJ, Donnelly EF et al (2004) Sonographic depiction of microvessel perfusion: principles and potential. J Ultrasound Med 23:1499-1506
Delorme S, Krix M (2006) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound for examining tumor biology. Cancer Imaging 27:148-152
Wilson SR, Burns PN (2010) Microbubble-enhanced US in body imaging: what role? Radiology 257:24-39
Kim AY, Choi BI, Kim TK, Kim KW, Lee JY, Han JK (2001) Comparison of contrast-enhanced fundamental imaging, second-harmonic imaging, and pulse-inversion harmonic imaging. Invest Radiol 36:582-588
Greis C (2004) Technology overview: SonoVue (Bracco, Milan). Eur Radiol 14 [Suppl 8]:11-15
Cosgrove D (2004) Future prospects for SonoVue and CPS. Eur Radiol 14 [Suppl 8]:116-124
Zhang B, Jiang YX, Liu JB et al (2010) Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of thyroid nodules. Thyroid 20:51-57
Bartolotta TV, Midiri M, Galia M et al (2006) Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of solitary thyroid nodules with contrast-enhanced ultrasound: initial results. Eur Radiol 16:2234-2241
Argalia G, De Bernardis S, Mariani D et al (2002) Ultrasonographic contrast agent: evaluation of time-intensity curves in the characterization of solitary thyroid nodules. Radiol Med (Torino) 103:407-413
Spiezia S, Farina R, Cerbone G et al (2001) Analysis of color Doppler signal intensity variation after levovist injection: a new approach to the diagnosis of thyroid nodules. J Ultrasound Med 20:223-231
Appetecchia M, Bacaro D, Brigida R, Milardi D, Bianchi A, Solivetti F (2006) Second generation ultrasonographic contrast agents in the diagnosis of neoplastic thyroid nodules. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 25:325-330
Lyshchik A, Moses R, Barnes SL et al (2007) Quantitative analysis of tumor vascularity in benign and malignant solid thyroid nodules. J Ultrasound Med 26:837-846
Sun Y, Fang S, Dong H et al (2011) Correlation between osteopontin messenger RNA expression and microcalcification shown on sonography in papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Ultrasound Med 30:765-771
Baier ND, Hahn PF, Gervais DA et al (2009) Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: experience in a cohort of 944 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193:1175-1179
Forsberg F, Dicker AP, Thakur ML et al (2002) Comparing contrast-enhanced ultrasound to immunohistochemical markers of angiogenesis in a human melanoma xenograft model: preliminary results. Ultrasound Med Biol 28:445-451
Carraro R, Molinari F, Deandrea M, Garberoglio R, Suri JS (2008) Characterization of thyroid nodules by 3-D contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008:2229-2232
Molinari F, Mantovani A, Deandrea M, Limone P, Garberoglio R, Suri JS (2010) Characterization of single thyroid nodules by contrast-enhanced 3-D ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol 36:1616-1625
Papini E, Guglielmi R, Bianchini A et al (2002) Risk of malignancy in nonpalpable thyroid nodules: predictive value of ultrasound and color-Doppler features. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 87:1941-1946
Iared W, Shigueoka DC, Cristófoli JC et al (2010) Use of color Doppler ultrasonography for the prediction of malignancy in follicular thyroid neoplasms: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Ultrasound Med 29:419-425
Nakase K, Yamamoto K, Hiasa A, Tawara I, Yamaguchi M, Shiku H (2006) Contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination of lymph nodes in different types of lymphoma. Cancer Detect Prev 30:188-91
Kim AY, Park SB, Choi HS, Hwang JC (2007) Isolated thyroid metastasis from renal cell carcinoma. J Ultrasound Med 26:1799-802
Ignee A, Jedrejczyk M, Schuessler G, Jakubowski W, Dietrich CF (2010) Quantitative contrast enhanced ultrasound of the liver for time intensity curves—reliability and potential sources of errors. Eur J Radiol 73:153-158
Acknowledgements
The authors wish to acknowledge Ms. Mary McAllister, MA (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA), for her outstanding support in editing the manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nemec, U., Nemec, S.F., Novotny, C. et al. Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound after intravenous administration of a microbubble contrast agent for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: assessment of diagnostic accuracy. Eur Radiol 22, 1357–1365 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2385-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-012-2385-6