Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of liver fibrosis

  • Magnetic Resonance
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the usefulness of diffusion- weighted MRI (DWI) in the detection and staging of liver fibrosis and inflammation.

Methods

DWI was performed with b-factors of 0, 500 and 1000 s/mm². ADC values were obtained by placing circular regions of interest in four segments of the liver. Differences between the study (n = 34) and control groups’ (n = 25) ADC values were examined. Further, this study investigated if and how ADC values were related to fibrosis stages and histological activity index (HAI) scores.

Results

The mean ADC value of the liver was smaller in the study group compared with the control group (P < 0.001). Spearman rho correlation analyses showed lower ADC values were associated with higher fibrosis and HAI scores (P < 0.01). There were statistically significant differences in liver ADC values between each combination of fibrosis stages (e.g. stages 0 and 1, 0 and 2) except for stages 1 and 2.

Conclusions

ADC values prove to be a valuable technique for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis and inflammation. They can also be useful in fibrosis staging, particularly in distinguishing later stages of fibrosis from intermediate and early stages.

Key Points

  • Diffusion Weighted MRI is a promising technique for diagnosis of liver fibrosis.

  • Apparent Diffusion Coefficients provide valuable information for staging of liver fibrosis.

  • DWI may offer alternative to biopsy for assessing liver fibrosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Malekzadeh R, Mohamadnejad M, Nasseri-Moghaddam S et al (2004) Reversibility of cirrhosis in autoimmune hepatitis. Am J Med 117:125–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wanless IR, Nakashima E, Sherman M (2000) Regression of human cirrhosis: morphologic features and the genesis of incomplete septal cirrhosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124:1599–1607

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dufour JF, DeLellis R, Kaplan MM (1998) Regression of hepatic fibrosis in hepatitis C with long-term interferon treatment. Dig Dis Sci 43:2573–2576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Rambaldi A, Gluud C (2005) Colchicine for alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD002148

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Safadi R, Zigmond E, Pappo O, Shalev Z, Ilan Y (2007) Amelioration of hepatic fibrosis via beta-glucosyl- ceramide-mediated immune modulation is associated with altered CD8 and NKT lymphocyte distribution. Int Immunol 19:1021–1029

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Berg T, Sarrazin C, Hinrichsen H et al (2004) Does non-invasive staging of fibrosis challenge liver biopsy as a gold standard in chronic hepatitis C? Hepatology 39:1456–1457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Afdhal NH, Nunes D (2004) Evaluation of liver fibrosis: a concise review. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1160–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kugelmas M (2004) Liver biopsy. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1416–1417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vallet-Pichard A, Mallet V, Nalpas B et al (2007) FIB- 4: an inexpensive and accurate marker of fibrosis in HCV infection—comparison with liver biopsy and FibroTest. Hepatology 46:32–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ziol M, Handra-Luca A, Kettaneh A et al (2005) Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis by measurement of stiffness in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 41:48–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rouvire O, Yin M, Dresner MA et al (2006) MR elastography of the liver: preliminary results. Radiology 240:440–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Castera L, Vergniol J, Foucher J et al (2005) Prospective comparison of transient elastography, FibroTest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 128:343–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Annet L, Materne R, Danse E, Jamart J, Horsmans Y, Van Beers BE (2003) Hepatic flow parameters measured with MR imaging and Doppler US: correlations with degree of cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Radiology 229:409–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hagiwara M, Rusinek H, Lee VS et al (2008) Quantification of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease using 3D perfusion-weighted MR imaging: preliminary experience. Radiology 246:926–934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kwee TC, Takahara T, Ochiai R, Nievelstein RA, Luijten PR (2008) Diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): features and potential applications in oncology. Eur Radiol 18:1937–1952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kele PG, van der Jagt EJ (2010) Diffusion weighted imaging in the liver. World J Gastroenterol 16:1567–1576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Muraoka N, Uematsu H, Kimura H et al (2008) Apparent diffusion coefficient in pancreatic cancer: characterisation and histopathological correlations. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:1302–1308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Naganawa S, Sato C, Kumada H et al (2005) Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix. Eur Radiol 15:71–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Inci E, Hocaoglu E, Aydin S, Cimilli T (2011) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of primary solid and cystic renal masses using the Bosniak classification. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.024

  20. Inci E, Kilickesmez O, Hocaoglu E, Aydin S, Bayramoglu S, Cimilli T (2011) Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Eur Radiol 21:768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Girometti R, Furlan A, Bazzocchi M et al (2007) Diffusion-weighted MRI in evaluating liver fibrosis: a feasibility study in cirrhotic patients. Radiol Med 112:394–408

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Moteki T, Horikoshi H (2006) Evaluation of hepatic lesions and hepatic parenchyma using diffusion weighted echo-planar MR with three values of gradient b-factor. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:637–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Sumi S, Tang Y, Takahashi M (1997) Focal liver masses: characterisation with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 204:739–744

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J, Nitatori T, Araki T (1998) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:397–402

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Taouli B, Tolia AJ, Losada M et al (2007) Diffusion weighted MRI for quantification of liver fibrosis: preliminary experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:799–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lewin M, Poujol-Robert A, Boelle PY et al (2007) Diffusion- weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 46:658–665

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sandrasegaran K, Akışık FM, Lin C, Tahir B, Rajan J, Saxena R, Aisen AM (2009) Value of diffusion-weighted MRI for assessing liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(6):1556–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Soylu A, Kılıçkesmez Ö, Poturoğlu Ş, Dolapçıoğlu C, Serez K, Sevindir İ, Yaşar N, Akyıldız M, Kumbasar B (2010) Utility of diffusion-weighted MRI for assessing liver fibrosis in patients with chronic active hepatitis. Diagn Interv Radiol 16:204–208

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Koinuma M, Ohashi I, Hanafusa K, Shibuya H (2005) Apparent diffusion coefficient measurements with diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for evaluation of hepatic fibrosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:80–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Boulanger Y, Amara M, Lepanto L et al (2003) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver of hepatitis C patients. NMR Biomed 16:132–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Knodell RG, Ishak KG, Black WC et al (1981) Formulation and application of a numerical scoring system for assessing histological activity in asymptomatic chronic active hepatitis. Hepatology 1:431–435

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Istanbul Bakirkoy Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey

    Ayse Ahsen Bakan, Ercan Inci & Tan Cimilli

  2. Deparment of Radiology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

    Selim Bakan

  3. Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterohepatology, Istanbul University, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

    Suut Gokturk

Authors
  1. Ayse Ahsen Bakan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ercan Inci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Selim Bakan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Suut Gokturk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tan Cimilli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayse Ahsen Bakan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bakan, A.A., Inci, E., Bakan, S. et al. Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of liver fibrosis. Eur Radiol 22, 682–687 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2295-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2295-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation