Eur Radiol (DOI 10.1007/s00330-009-1313-x)
The affiliation of some authors are wrong. Please find the correct ones below:
M. Morichau-Beauchant2 P. Levillain3.
In the paragraph Statistical Analysis, “interclass correlation coefficients” (line 1) should be replaced by “intraclass correlation coefficients” or “Kappa coefficients”.
In the paragraph Results, “the interclass correlation” (line 8) should be replaced by “the Kappa coefficients” and in the sentence beginning by “for calculating the transit time...” (line 9), “correlation” should be replaced by “concordance” and “Kappa” should be replaced by “intraclass correlation coefficient”.
In the ROC curve of Fig. 4, sensitivity and specificity should be reversed. See corrected figure below.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for the diagnosis of severe fibrosis: area under the curve estimated at 0.847 (95% CI: 0.768–0.926)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1313-x.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Staub, F., Tournoux-Facon, C., Roumy, J. et al. Liver fibrosis staging with contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: prospective multicenter study compared with METAVIR scoring. Eur Radiol 19, 1998–1999 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1468-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1468-5