Skip to main content
Log in

Multidetector CT enteroclysis versus barium enteroclysis with methylcellulose in patients with suspected small bowel disease

  • Gastrointestinal
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multidetector-CT enteroclysis (MDCT-E) versus barium enteroclysis with methylcellulose (BE) in clinically selected patients with suspected small bowel disease. We prospectively studied 52 patients who underwent unenhanced and contrast-enhanced multidetector CT (16 rows) after administration of 2–2.5 l of methylcellulose by naso-jejunal tube. BE was performed after administration of barium 60% w/v (200–250 ml) and methylcellulose (1–2 l). Patients with radiological signs of Crohn’s disease were classified into the following subtypes: active, fibrostenotic, fistulising/perforating, reparative or regenerative subtypes. Twenty-eight patients also underwent endoscopy. The radiological prevalent subtype was the active subtype. The sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy of MDCT-E versus BE was 83%, 100% and 89%, respectively. BE showed five false negative CT cases due to early Crohn’s disease; endoscopy confirmed positive cases of the CT and the BE, but showed one false negative case of the BE. Together, MDCT enteroclysis and BE permitted the diagnosis of Crohn’s disease in 30 patients, adhesions in one patient, lymphoma in two patients and carcinoid tumours in two patients. In conclusion, MDCT-E permits good representation of pathological patterns. Early stages of Crohn’s disease are better evaluated by BE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Birnbaum BA (1999) Computed tomography of the small bowel. Technique and principles of interpretation. In: Herlinger H, Maglinte DDT, Birnbaum BA (eds) Clinical imaging of the small intestine. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 153–166

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bender GN, Timmons JH, Williard WC, Carter J (1996) Computed tomographic enteroclysis: one methodology. Invest Radiol 31:43–49

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maglinte DD, Gourtsoyiannis N, Rex D, Howard TJ, Kelvin FM (2003) Classification of small bowel Crohn’s subtypes based on multimodality imaging. Radiol Clin North Am 41:285–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Liangpunsakul S, Chadalawada V, Rex DK, Maglinte D, Lappas J (2003) Wireless capsule endoscopy detects small bowel ulcers in patients with normal results from state of the art enteroclysis. Am J Gastroenterol 98:1295–1298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hara AK, Leighton JA, Sharma VK, Fleisher DE (2004) Small bowel: preliminary comparison of capsule endoscopy with barium study and CT. Radiology 230:260–265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Maglinte DDT, Hallett RL, Rex D (2001) Imaging of small bowel Crohn’s disease: can abdominal CT replace barium radiography? Emerg Radiol 8:127–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Klöppel R, Thiele J, Bosse J (1992) The Sellink CT method. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 156:291–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scholten ET, Ziedses des Plantes BG, Falke TH (1995) Computed tomography of the large bowel wall. Choice of slice thickness and intraluminal contrast medium. Invest Radiol 5:275–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rollandi GA, Curone PF, Biscaldi E, Nardi F, Bonifacino E, Conzi R, Derchi LE (1999) Spiral CT of the abdomen after distension of small bowel loops with transparent enema in patients with Crohn’s disease. Abdom Imaging 24:544–549

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Turetschek K, Schober E, Wunderbaldinger P, Bernhard C, Schima W, Puespoek A, Vogelsang H, Moeschl P, Mostbeck G (2002) Findings at helical CT enteroclysis in symptomatic patients with Crohn disease: correlation with endoscopic and surgical findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26:488–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wold PB, Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Sandborn WJ (2003) Assessment of small bowel Crohn disease: noninvasive peroral CT enterography compared with other imaging methods and endoscopy-feasibility study. Radiology 229:275–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Makò EK, Mester AR, Tarjan Z, Karlinger K, Toth G (2000) Enteroclysis and spiral CT examination in diagnosis and evaluation of small bowel Crohn’s disease. Eur J Radiol 35:168–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rust GF, Sackman M, Eisele O, Reiser M (2001) Virtual large intestine imaging with multi-level CT. Pain free coloscopy that works! MMW Fortschr Med 143:32–36

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Balthazar EJ (2002) Evaluation of the small intestine by computed tomography. In: Gourtsoyiannis NC (ed) Radiological imaging of the small intestine. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 87–130

    Google Scholar 

  15. Horton KM, Eng J, Fishman EK (2000) Normal enhancement of the small bowel: evaluation with spiral CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:67–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Maglinte DD, Lappas JC, Heitkamp DE, Bender GN, Kelvin FM (2003) Technical refinements in enteroclysis. Radiol Clin North Am 41:213–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kelvin FM, Herlinger H (1999) Crohn’s disease. In: Herlinger H, Maglinte DDT, Birnbaum BA (eds) Clinical imaging of the small intestine. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 259–289

    Google Scholar 

  18. Horton KM, Fishamn EK (2003) The current status of multidetector row CT and three-dimensional imaging of the small bowel. Radiol Clin North Am 41:199–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Raptopoulos V, Schwatz RK, McNicholas MM, Movson J, Pearlman J, Joffe N (1997) Multiplanar helical CT enterography in patients with Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1545–1550

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidt S, Chevallier P, Charalon M, Bessoud B, Verdun FR, Frascarolo P, Schnyder P, Denys A (2005) Multidetector CT enteroclysis: comparison of the reading performance for axial and coronal views. Eur Radiol 15:238–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Romano S, De Lutio E, Rollandi GA, Romano L, Grassi R, Maglinte DD (2005) Multidetector computer tomography enteroclysis (MDCT-E) with neutral enteral and IV contrast enhancement in tumor detection. Eur Radiol 15:1178–1183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura Maria Minordi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Minordi, L.M., Vecchioli, A., Guidi, L. et al. Multidetector CT enteroclysis versus barium enteroclysis with methylcellulose in patients with suspected small bowel disease. Eur Radiol 16, 1527–1536 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0185-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0185-6

Keywords

Navigation