Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Magnetic resonance imaging of autologous fat grafting

  • Magnetic Resonance
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 30-year-old female patient with isolated facial lipodystrophy underwent two sessions of fat injection. MR signals of injected fat at different injection ages were compared to native fat. Native T1 signal was smaller for transplant fat, probably due to a slightly lower fat content and/or fibrosis or due to higher perfusion. T2 signal of transplants was significantly higher than that of native fat. T1 post-contrast was also higher, and contrast uptake of transplanted fat increased slightly with transplant age, which could be explained by an increasing perfusion. This study demonstrates the differences and MR signal time changes of native and transplanted fat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guerrerosantos J (2000) Long-term outcome of autologous fat transplantation in aesthetic facial recontouring: sixteen years of experience with 1,936 cases. Clin Plast Surg 27:515–543

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dejonckere PH, van Wijngaarden HA (2001) Retropharyngeal autologous fat transplantation for congenital short palate: a nasometric assessment of functional results. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 110:168–172

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaminer MS, Omura ME (2001) Editorial. Comment on Arch Dermatol. Arch Dermatol 137:812–814

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sadick NS, Hudgins LC (2001) Fatty acid analysis of transplanted adipose tissue. Arch Dermatol 137:723–727

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Horl HW, Feller AM, Biemer E (1991) Technique for liposuction fat reimplantation and long-term volume evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Plast Surg 26:248–258

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanamori M, Kawaguchi Y, Ohmori K, Kimura T, Md HT, Matsui H (2001) The fate of autogenous free-fat grafts after posterior lumbar surgery: part 1. A postoperative serial magnetic resonance imaging study. Spine 26:2258–2263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gandy SJ, Sudarshan TA, Sheppard DG, Allan LC, McLeay TB, Houston JG (2003) Dynamic MRI contrast enhancement of renal cortex: a functional assessment of renovascular disease in patients with renal artery stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 18:461–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hosono M, Kobayashi H, Fujimoto R, Kotoura Y, Tsuboyama T, Matsusue Y, Nakamura T, Itoh T, Konishi J (1997) Septum-like structures in lipoma and liposarcoma: MR imaging and pathologic correlation. Skelet Radiol 26:150–154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheon JE, Kim IO, Kim CJ, Kim WS, Yoo WJ, Choi IH, Yeon KM (2003) Imaging findings after fat graft interposition in an injured growth plate: an experimental study in rabbits. Invest Radiol 38:695–703

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne C. Goehde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Goehde, S.C., Kuehl, H. & Ladd, M.E. Magnetic resonance imaging of autologous fat grafting. Eur Radiol 15, 2423–2426 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2765-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2765-2

Keywords

Navigation