Skip to main content
Log in

Multislice computed tomography perfusion imaging for visualization of acute pulmonary embolism: animal experience

  • Experimental
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of our animal study was to evaluate a new computed tomography (CT) subtraction technique for visualization of perfusion defects within the lung parenchyma in subsegmental pulmonary embolism (PE). Seven healthy pigs were entered into a prospective trial. Acute PE was artificially induced by fresh clot material prior to the CT scans. Within a single breath-hold, whole thorax CT scans were performed with a 16-slice multidetector-row CT scanner (SOMATOM Sensation 16; Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) before and after intravenous application of 80 ml of contrast medium with a flow rate of 4 ml/s, followed by a saline chaser. The scan parameters were 120 kV and 100 mAseff, using a thin collimation of 16×0.75 mm and a table speed/rotation of 15–18 mm (pitch, 1.25–1.5; rotation time, 0.5 s). Axial source images were reconstructed with an effective slice thickness of 1 mm (overlap, 30%). A new automatic subtraction technique was used. After 3D segmentation of the lungs in the plain and contrast-enhanced series, threshold-based extraction of major airways and vascular structures in the contrast images was performed. This segmentation was repeated in the plain CT images segmenting the same number of vessels and airways as in the contrast images. Both scans were registered onto each other using nonrigid registration. After registration both image sets were filtered in a nonlinear fashion excluding segmented airways and vessels. After subtracting the plain CT data from the contrast data the resulting enhancement images were color-encoded and overlaid onto the contrast-enhanced CT angiography (CTA) images. This color-encoded combined display of parenchymal enhancement of the lungs was evaluated interactively on a workstation (Leonardo, Siemens) in axial, coronal and sagittal plane orientations. Axial contrast-enhanced CTA images were rated first, followed by an analysis of the combination images. Finally, CTA images were reread focusing on areas with perfusion deficits indicating PE on the color-coded enhancement display. Subtraction was feasible for all seven studies. In one animal, opacification of the pulmonary arteries was suboptimal owing to heart insufficiency. In the remaining six pigs, a total of 37 perfusion defects were clearly assessable downstream of occluded subsegmental arteries, showing lower or missing enhancement compared with normally perfused lung parenchyma. Indeterminate findings from CTA showed typical PE perfusion defects in four out of six cases on CT subtraction. Additionally, 22 peripheral triangular-shaped enhancement defects were delineated. Nine of these findings were reclassified as definitely being caused by PE on second reading of the CTA data sets. Our initial results have shown that this new subtraction technique for perfusion imaging of PE is feasible, using routine contrast delivery. Dedicated examination protocols are mandatory for adequate opacification of the pulmonary arteries and for optimization of data sets for subsequent subtraction. Perfusion imaging allows a comprehensive assessment of morphology and function, providing more accurate information on acute PE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swensen SJ, Sheedy PF II,Ryu JH, Pickett DD, Schleck CD, Ilstrup DM, Heit JA (2002) Outcomes after withholding anticoagulation from patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative computed tomographic findings: a cohort study. Mayo Clin Proc 77:130–138

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goodman LR, Lipchik RJ, Kuzo RS, Liu Y, McAuliffe TL, O’Brien DJ (2000) Subsequent pulmonary embolism: risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram: prospective comparison with scintigraphy. Radiology 215:535–542

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gottsäter A, Berg A, Centergard J, Frennby B, Nirhov N, Nyman U (2001) Clinically suspected pulmonary embolism: is it safe to withhold anticoagulation after a negative spiral CT? Eur Radiol 11:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tillie-Leblond L, Mastora I, Radenne F, Paillard S, Tonnel AB, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M (2002) Risk of pulmonary embolism after a negative spiral CT angiogram in patients with pulmonary disease: 1-year clinical follow-up study. Radiology 223:461–467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Musset D, Parent F, Meyer G, Maitre S, Girard P, Leroyer C, Revel MP, Carette MF, Laurent M, Charbonnier B, Laurent F, Mal H, Nonent M, Lancar R, Grenier P, Simonneau G (2002) Evaluation du Scanner Spirale dans l’Embolie Pulmonaire study group. Diagnostic strategy for patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a prospective multicentre outcome study. Lancet 360:1914–1920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Donato AA, Scheirer JJ, Atwell MS, Gramp J, Duszak R Jr (2003) Clinical outcomes in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism and negative helical computed tomographic results in whom anticoagulation is withheld. Arch Intern Med 163:2033–2038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kavanagh EC, O’Hare A, Hargaden G, Murray JG (2004) Risk of pulmonary embolism after negative MDCT pulmonary angiography findings. Am J Roentgenol 182:499–504

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schoepf UJ, Costello P (2004) CT angiography for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: state of the art. Radiology 230:329–337

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Coche E, Verschuren F, Hainaut P, Goncette L (2004) Pulmonary embolism findings on chest radiographs and multislice spiral CT. Eur Radiol 14:1241–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee Pulmonary Embolism Guideline Development Group (2003) British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax 58:470–483

    Google Scholar 

  11. Goldhaber SZ, Elliott CG (2003) Acute pulmonary embolism. Part I. Epidemiology, pathophysiology, and diagnosis. Circulation 108:2726–2729

    Google Scholar 

  12. Müller C, Kopka L, Funke M, Funke C, Grabbe E (2001) Diagnosis of lung embolism and underlying venous thrombosis in multi-slice spiral CT. Rofo 173:528–535

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ghaye B, Szapiro D, Mastora I, Delannoy V, Duhamel A, Remy J, Remy-Jardin M (2001) Peripheral pulmonary arteries: how far in the lung does multi-detector row spiral CT allow analysis? Radiology 219:629–636

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schoepf UJ, Holzknecht N, Helmberger TK, Crispin A, Hong C, Becker CR, Reiser MF (2002) Subsegmental pulmonary emboli: improved detection with thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT. Radiology 222:483–490

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Patel S, Kazerooni EA, Cascade PN (2003) Pulmonary embolism: optimization of small pulmonary arteries visualization at multidetector row CT. Radiology 227:455–460

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wintersperger BJ, Stäbler A, Seemann M, Holzknecht N, Helmberger T, Fink U, Reiser MF (1999) Evaluation of right ventricular performance in patients with acute pulmonary embolism by helical CT. Rofo 170:542–549

    Google Scholar 

  17. Oliver TB, Reid JH, Murchison JT (1998) Interventricular septal shift due to massive pulmonary embolism shown by CT pulmonary angiography: an old sign revisited. Thorax 53:1092–1094

    Google Scholar 

  18. Quiroz R, Kucher N, Schoepf UJ, Kipfmueller F, Solomon SD, Costello P, Goldhaber SZ (2004) Right ventricular enlargement on chest computed tomography: prognostic role in acute pulmonary embolism. Circulation 109:2401–2404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Reinartz P, Schirp U, Zimny M, Sabri O, Nowak B, Schäfer W, Cremerius U, Büll U (2001) Optimizing ventilation–perfusion lung scintigraphy: parting with planar imaging. Nuklearmedizin 40:38–43

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Niethammer MU, Schoepf UJ, Wildberger JE, Klotz E, Fichte H, Schaller S (2001) New approach to diagnosis of pulmonary embolism using multislice CT. In: Chen TU, Clough AV (eds) Medical imaging: physiology and function from multidimensional images. Proc SPIE 4321:244–253

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wildberger JE, Niethammer MU, Klotz E, Schaller S, Wein BB, Günther RW (2001) Multi-slice CT for visualization of pulmonary embolism using perfusion weighted color maps. Rofo 173:289–294

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pluim JP, Maintz JB, Viergever MA (2003) Mutual information based registration of medical images: a survey. IEEE Trans Med Imag 22:986–1004

    Google Scholar 

  23. Arakawa H, Kurihara Y, Sasaka K, Nakajima Y, Webb WR (2002) Air trapping on CT of patients with pulmonary embolism. Am J Roentgenol 178:1201–1207

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shah AA, Davis SD, Gamsu G, Intriere L (1999) Parenchymal and pleural findings in patients with and patients without acute pulmonary embolism detected at spiral CT. Radiology 211:147–153

    Google Scholar 

  25. Coche EE, Müller NL, Kim KI, Wiggs BR, Mayo JR (1998) Acute pulmonary embolism: ancillary findings at spiral CT. Radiology 207:753–758

    Google Scholar 

  26. Groell R, Peichel KH, Uggowitzer MM, Schmid F, Hartwagner K (1999) Computed tomography densitometry of the lung: a method to assess perfusion defects in acute pulmonary embolism. Eur J Radiol 32:192–196

    Google Scholar 

  27. Screaton NJ, Coxson HO, Kalloger SE, Baile EM, Nakano Y, Hiorns M, Mayo JR (2003) Detection of lung perfusion abnormalities using computed tomography in a porcine model of pulmonary embolism. Thorac Imaging 18:14–20

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hoffman EA, Tajik JK, Kugelmass SD (1995) Matching pulmonary structure and perfusion via combined dynamic multislice CT and thin-slice high-resolution CT. Comput Med Imaging Graph 19:101–112

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chung MJ, Goo JM, Im JG, Lee KS, Kim KG, Park JH (2004) CT Perfusion imaging of the lung: value in the detection of pulmonary embolism in a porcine model. Invest Radiol 39:633–640

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schoepf UJ, Bruening R, Konschitzky H, Becker CR, Knez A, Weber J, Muehling O, Herzog P, Huber A, Haberl R, Reiser MF (2000) Pulmonary embolism: comprehensive diagnosis by using electron-beam CT for detection of emboli and assessment of pulmonary blood flow. Radiology 217:693–700

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Hennemuth A, Jung B, Koos R, Wildberger JE, Günther RW (2003) Measurement of cardiac output from a test-bolus injection in multislice computed tomography. Eur Radiol 13:2498–2504

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mahnken AH, Henzler D, Klotz E, Hennemuth A, Wildberger JE, Günther RW (2004) Determination of cardiac output with multislice spiral computed tomography: a validation study. Invest Radiol 39:451–454

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kalender WA, Rienmuller R, Seissler W, Behr J, Welke M, Fichte H (1990) Measurement of pulmonary parenchymal attenuation: use of spirometric gating with quantitative CT. Radiology 175:265–268

    Google Scholar 

  34. Suess C, Chen X (2002) Dose optimization in pediatric CT: current technology and future innovations. Pediatr Radiol 32:729–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was awarded and funded by the ECR in 2003 (Amersham Research and Education Fund: Novel approach to pulmonary embolism by multi-slice CT: subtraction technique using perfusion weighted color maps).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Ernst Wildberger.

Additional information

This paper contains data on behalf of the Amersham Health Research Fellowship Grant, ECR 2003.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wildberger, J.E., Klotz, E., Ditt, H. et al. Multislice computed tomography perfusion imaging for visualization of acute pulmonary embolism: animal experience. Eur Radiol 15, 1378–1386 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2718-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2718-9

Keywords

Navigation