Skip to main content
Log in

Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation

European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The potential of online tube current modulation in subsecond multislice spiral CT (MSCT) examinations of children to reduce the dose without a loss in image quality is investigated in a controlled patient study. The dose can be reduced for oval patient sectional view without an increase in noise if the tube current is reduced where the patient diameter and, consequently, attenuation are small. We investigated a product version of an online control for tube current in a SOMATOM Sensation 4 (Siemens, Forchheim). We evaluated image quality, noise and dose reduction for examinations with online tube current modulation in 30 MSCT of thorax/abdomen and abdomen and compared mA s for tube current modulation to the mA s in standard weight-adapted children protocols. Image quality was rated as “very good,” “good,” “diagnostic” and “poor” in a consensus by three radiologists. Noise was assessed in comparison to 24 MSCT examinations without tube current modulation measured as SD in ROIs. The dose was reduced from 26 to 43% (mean 36%), depending on the patient’s geometry and weight. In general, no loss of image quality was observed. Measured noise showed a decrease up to 26% and an increase up to 36%, although there was no decrease of image quality. Online tube current modulation is now used as a standard in MSCT at our institution. Dose in MSCT examinations of children can be reduced substantially in routine examinations by online tube current modulation without a loss of image quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Rogers LF (2001) Taking care of children. Check out the parameters used for helical CT. Am J Roentgenol 176:287

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ware D, Huda W, Mergo P, Litwiller A (1999) Radiation effective doses to patients undergoing abdominal CT examinations. Radiology 210:645–650

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Giacomuzzi SM, Erckert B, Freund MC, Schöpf T, Dessl A, Jaschke W (1996) Dosisreduktion in der Computertomographie mit einem neuen Scan Verfahren. Akt Radiol 6:110–113

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kopka L, Funke M, Breitner N, Hermann K-P, Vosshenrich R, Grabbe E (1995) Anatomisch adaptierte Variation des Röhrenstroms bei der CT. Untersuchungen zur Strahlendosisreduktion und Bildqualität. Fortschr Röntgenstr 163:383–387

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lehmann KJ, Wild J, Georgi M (1997) Klinischer Einsatz der Software gesteuerten Röhrenstrommodulation „SmartScan“ in der Spiral-CT. Akt Radiol 7:156–158

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C, Gies M, Greess H, Bautz WA (1999) Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantom and cadavers. Eur Radiol 9:323–328

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Greess H, Wolf H, Kalender WA, Bautz W (1998) Dose reduction in CT anatomically adapted tube current modulation: first patient studies. In: Glazer G, Krestin G (eds) Advances in CT IV. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 35–40

  8. Greess H, Wolf H, Baum U, Lell M, Pirkl M, Kalender WA, Bautz W (2000) Dose reduction in computed tomography by attenuation based on on-line modulation of the tube current: evaluation of six anatomical regions. Eur Radiol 10:391–394

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Greess H, Nömayr A, Wolf H, Baum U, Lell M, Böwing B, Kalender WA, Bautz WA (2002) Dose reduction in CT examination of children by attenuation-based on-line modulation of tube current (CARE Dose). Eur Radiol 12:1571–1576

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C, Gies M, Greess H, Bautz W (1998) Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation: principles and first results. In: Glazer G, Krestin G (eds) Advances in CT IV. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 27–34

  11. Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess Ch (1999) Dose reduction in CT by anatomically adapted tube current modulation. II. Phantom measurements. Med Phys 26:2248–2253

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ihaka R, Gentlemen R (1996) R: a language for data analysis and graphics. J Comput and Graph Stat 5:299–314

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brix G, Nagel HD, Stamm G, Veit R, Lechel U, Griebel J, Galanski M (2003) Radiation exposure in multi-slice versus single-slice spiral CT: results of a nationwide survey. Eur Radiol 13:1979–1991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohnen M, Poll LW, Puettmann C, Ewen K, Saleh A, Mödder U (2003) Effective doses in standard protocols for multi-slice CT scanning. Eur Radiol 13:1148–1153

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ambrosino MM, Genieser NB, Roche KJ, Kaul A, Lawrence RM (1994) Feasibility of high-resolution, low-dose chest CT in evaluating the paediatric chest. Pediatr Radiol 24:6–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Donnelly LF, Emery KH, Brody AS, Laor T, Gylys-Morin VM, Anton CG, Thomas SR, Frush DP (2001) Minimizing radiation dose for paediatric body: applications of single-detector helical CT. Strategies at a large children’s hospital. Am J Roentgenol 176:303–306

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vock P (2002) CT Exposition beim Kind: Geht das Erwachen der Amerikaner uns Europäer an? Radiologe 42:679–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Greess.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greess, H., Lutze, J., Nömayr, A. et al. Dose reduction in subsecond multislice spiral CT examination of children by online tube current modulation. Eur Radiol 14, 995–999 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2301-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-004-2301-9

Keywords

Navigation