Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Temporal artery biopsy for suspected giant cell arteritis: a retrospective analysis

  • Observational Research
  • Published:
Rheumatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Temporal artery biopsy (TAB) is one of the diagnostic criteria of giant cell arteritis (GCA) according to 1990 ACR criteria and remains a tool for diagnosis. Although clinicians perform TAB with an intent to confirm suspected GCA, some biopsies result in negative and some lead to non-GCA diagnoses. We aim to review the diagnoses after TAB biopsy performed for suspected GCA and also wanted to evaluate the diagnostic changes and concomitant diseases that develop over time. The patients who had undergone TAB for suspected GCA were identified using the record entry code for TAB. Patients meeting the classification criteria for GCA were designated as the GCA group and not meeting criteria were designated as a non-GCA group. Other classification criteria were implemented for the non-GCA group diseases. A total of 51 patients (Female: 62.7%, median age: 72.1 ± 7.4 years) who had undergone TAB for suspected GCA were evaluated. TAB was positive in 23 (69.6%) of the 33 patients who met the GCA classification criteria. No significant difference was found between TAB-positive and TAB-negative GCA patients in terms of clinical and laboratory parameters. In the non-GCA group, 12 patients had isolated polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR), and the diagnoses of the remaining six patients were as follows: four large vessel vasculitis (LVV) not satisfying GCA diagnostic criteria, one chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), and one amyloidosis. TAB was negative in all patients with isolated PMR. TAB showed primary amyloidosis in one patient. Out of 33 GCA patients, 21 had “isolated” GCA, four had GCA + Rheumatoid arthritis (RA), seven had GCA + PMR, and one had GCA + polymyositis. RA was diagnosed antecedent to GCA in two patients, and after GCA in the other two patients. One of the patients had developed GCA 20 years after polymyositis had been diagnosed. TAB was found to be positive in two-thirds of patients with suspected GCA. Late-onset RA and rarely other inflammatory rheumatic diseases may develop in the course of GCA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kramer GD, Lebiedz-Odrobina D, Mamalis N (2017) Amyloidosis mimicking temporal arteritis in multiple myeloma. Ophthalmology 124:1798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Albreiki D, Gostimir M, Patel V, Farmer J (2017) Concurrent diagnosis of giant cell arteritis and chronic lymphocytic leukemia in a temporal artery biopsy. Can J Ophthalmol 52:e115–e117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Albreiki D, Al Belushi F, Patel V, Farmer J (2016) When a temporal artery biopsy reveals a diagnosis other than temporal arteritis: eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. Can J Ophthalmol 51:e108–e109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shimamoto Y, Matsunaga C, Suga K, Fukushima N, Nomura K, Yamaguchi M (1994) A human T-cell lymphotropic virus type I carrier with temporal arteritis terminating in acute myelogenous leukemia. Scand J Rheumatol 23:151–153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Martinelli N, Marcolini L (2018) Without headache: fever of unknown cause due to giant cell arteritis. J Clin Rheumatol 24:38–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Liozon E, Boutros-Toni F, Loustaud-Ratti V, Soria P, Vidal E (2003) Silent, or masked, giant cell arteritis is associated with a strong inflammatory response and a benign short term course. J Rheumatol 30:1272–1276

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Krug S, Portig I, Librizzi D, Pfestroff A, Gress T, Michl P (2013) A 79-year-old man with B symptoms and jaw claudication. Internist (Berl) 54:249–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Onuma K, Chu CT, Dabbs DJ (2007) Asymptomatic giant-cell (temporal) arteritis involving the bilateral adnexa: case report and literature review. Int J Gynecol Pathol 26:352–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scheldeman L, Van Hoydonck M, Vanheste R, Theys T, Cypers G (2019) Crowned dens syndrome: a neurologist’s perspective. Acta Neurol Belg 119:561–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gran JT, Myklebust G (2000) The incidence and clinical characteristics of peripheral arthritis in polymyalgia rheumatica and temporal arteritis: a prospective study of 231 cases. Rheumatology 39:283–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Salvarani C, Hunder GG (1999) Musculoskeletal manifestations in a population-based cohort of patients with giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 42:1259–1266

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ginsburg WW, Cohen MD, Hall SB, Vollertsen RS, Hunder GG (1985) Seronegative polyarthritis in giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 28:1362–1366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Korkmaz C, Yıldız P (2017) Giant cell arteritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, and late-onset rheumatoid arthritis: can they be components of a single disease process in elderly patients? Eur J Rheumatol 4:157–160

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Pease CT, Haugeberg G, Morgan AW, Montague B, Hensor EM, Bhakta BB (2005) Diagnosing late onset rheumatoid arthritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, and temporal arteritis in patients presenting with polymyalgic symptoms. A prospective longterm evaluation. J Rheumatol 32:1043–1046

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hunder GG, Bloch DA, Michel BA et al (1990) The American College of Rheumatology 1990 criteria for the classification of giant cell arteritis. Arthritis Rheum 33:1122–1128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bird HA, Esselinckx W, Dixon AS, Mowat AG, Wood PH (1979) An evaluation of criteria for polymyalgia rheumatica. Ann Rheum Dis 38:434–439

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ et al (2010a) 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum 62:2569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ et al (2010b) 2010 rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 69:1580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dejaco C, Ramiro S, Duftner C et al (2018) EULAR recommendations for the use of imaging in large vessel vasculitis in clinical practice. Ann Rheum Dis 77:636–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gonzalez-Gay MA (2005) The diagnosis and management of patients with giant cell arteritis. J Rheumatol 32:1186–1188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Breuer GS, Nesher R, Nesher G (2009a) Effect of biopsy length on the rate of positive temporal artery biopsies. Clin Exp Rheumatol 27(1 Suppl 52):S10–S13

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Breuer GS, Nesher G, Nesher R (2009b) Rate of discordant findings in bilateral temporal artery biopsy to diagnose giant cell arteritis. J Rheumatol 36:794–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Masson W, Muller S, Whittle R, Prior J, Helliwell T, Mallen C, Hider SL (2017) Possible giant cell arteritis symptoms are common in newly diagnosed patients with polymyalgia rheumatica: results from an incident primary care PMR cohort. BMC Rheumatol 1:7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Sammel AM, Hsiao E, Schembri G et al (2019) Diagnostic accuracy of positron emission tomography/computed tomography of the head, neck, and chest for giant cell arteritis: a prospective, double-blind, cross-sectional study. Arthritis Rheumatol 71:1319–1328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Merkel PA, Unizony S, Ponte C, Grayson PC, Suppiah P. ACR: Updated classification criteria for large-vessel vasculitis. Presented at: 2018 ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting; October 19–24, 2018; Chicago, IL. Session 5T116

  26. Rodriguez-Valverde V, Sarabia JM, Gonzales-Gay MA et al (1997) Risk factors and predictive models of giant cell arteritis in polymyalgia rheumatica. Am J Med 102:331–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Salvarani C, Cantini F, Boiardi L, Hunder GG (2004) Polymyalgia rheumatica. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 18:705–722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Caporali R, Montecucco C, Epis O, Bobbio-Pallavicini F, Maio T, Cimmino MA (2001) Presenting features of polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR) and rheumatoid arthritis with PMR-like onset: a prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 60:1021–1024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Hunter TM, Boytsov NN, Zhang X et al (2017) Prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis in the United States adult population in healthcare claims databases, 2004–2014. Rheumatol Int 37:1551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Korkmaz C, Zubaroğlu I, Kaya T, Akay OM (2001) Takayasu’s arteritis associated with rheumatoid arthritis: a case report and review of the litera-ture. Rheumatology 40:1420–1422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Broggini M, Filardi GP, Volontè S, Bottà V, Cappelli A, Crespi E (1988) Temporal arteritis in seropositive rheumatoid arthritis with rheumatoid nodule. Clin Exp Rheumatol 6:141–143

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Omdal R, Husby G (1984) Coexistence of temporal arteritis/polymyalgia rheumatic and rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol 3:525–527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hørslev-Petersen K, Helin P (1983) Coexistence of temporal arteritis and rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 10:831–833

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Harada S, Mitsunobu F, Kodama F et al (1999) Giant cell arteritis associated with rheumatoid arthritis monitored by magnetic resonance angiography. Intern Med 38:675–678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study concept and design: DUC, HUT and CK; analysis and interpretation of data: DUC, HUT, and CK; drafting of the manuscript: DUC and CK, critically revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: DUC, HUT and CK; final approval of the version to be published: DUC, HUT and CK.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Döndü Üsküdar Cansu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was obtained from Eskisehir Osmangazi University Ethics Committee (20 November 2018, No.279).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Üsküdar Cansu, D., Üsküdar Teke, H. & Korkmaz, C. Temporal artery biopsy for suspected giant cell arteritis: a retrospective analysis. Rheumatol Int 41, 1803–1810 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04738-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04738-7

Keywords

Navigation