Skip to main content
Log in

Neue Aspekte in der Chirurgie des Pankreaskarzinoms

Prinzipien – Ergebnisse – Evidenz

New aspects of surgery for pancreatic cancer

Principles, results and evidence

  • Hauptreferate
  • Published:
Der Pathologe Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Der häufigste maligne Tumor des Pankreas ist das duktale Adenokarzinom. Eine komplette Tumorresektion ist nach wie vor der einzige potenziell kurative Therapieansatz. Die häufigste Tumorlokalisation ist der Pankreaskopf. Somit stellt die Pankreatoduodenektomie (Whipple/PPPD) das onkologische Standardoperationsverfahren dar. Durch Konzentration der Pankreasresektionen auf spezialisierte Zentren konnte die perioperative Morbidität und Mortalität in den letzten Jahren gesenkt werden. Nichtsdestotrotz bleibt gerade die Pankreaskopfresektion eine komplexe und schwierige Operation, insbesondere die Pankreasanastomose gilt als kompliziert. Des Weiteren sind häufig Gefäßresektionen im Bereich der portalvenösen Achse notwendig. Arterielle Gefäßresektionen werden selten durchgeführt, da sie selten zu einer R0-Situation führen. Nach kompletter Tumorresektion ist die Durchführung einer adjuvanten Chemotherapie als Standard anzusehen. Verstärkt halten auch neoadjuvante Behandlungskonzepte Einzug, weil ein Großteil der Tumoren bei Diagnosestellung lokal irresektabel ist. Fortschritte in der translationalen Forschung führen zum besseren Verständnis der Tumorbiologie. Hier sind in der Zukunft neue Aspekte für die Diagnostik und individualisierte Therapie des Pankreaskarzinoms zu erwarten.

Abstract

Ductal adenocarcinoma is the most frequent malignant tumor of the pancreas and total resection of the pancreatic tumor is still the only curative treatment option. Most tumors are located in the pancreatic head, therefore, pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (Whipple PPPD) is the oncological standard procedure. By concentrating pancreatic resections in specialized centers for pancreatic surgery perioperative mortality and morbidity has decreased in recent years. However, pancreatic resections remain complex and difficult operations and pancreatic anastomosis is particular challenging. To achieve complete resection (R0) resection and reconstruction of large venous vessels is often necessary. Resection of arterial vessels is rarely performed and usually does not lead to an R0 resection of the tumor. Currently adjuvant chemotherapy after total tumor resection is standard of care for all tumor stages but neoadjuvant regimes have recently been reported increasingly more often. Advances in translational research has led to a better understanding of tumor biology and new diagnostic options and therapies are expected in the near future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Sommerville CA, Limongelli P, Pai M et al (2009) Establishment of a preclinical ovine model for tibial segmental bone defect repair by applying bone tissue engineering strategies. J Surg Oncol 100:651–656

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Richter A, Niedergethmann M, Sturm JW et al (2003) Long-term results of partial pancreaticoduodenectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head: 25-year experience. World J Surg 27:324–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Winter JM, Cameron JL, Campbell KA et al (2006) 1423 pancreaticoduodenectomies for pancreatic cancer: a single-institution experience. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1199–1210

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lim JE, Chien MW, Earle CC (2003) Prognostic factors following curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a population-based, linked database analysis of 396 patients. Ann Surg 237:74–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sohn TA, Yeo CJ, Cameron JL et al (2000) Resected adenocarcinoma of the pancreas – 616 patients: results, outcomes, and prognostic indicators. J Gastrointest Surg 4:567–579

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Riediger H, Keck T, Wellner U et al (2009) The lymph node ratio is the strongest prognostic factor after resection of pancreatic cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1337–1344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cameron JL, Riall TS, Coleman J, Belcher KA (2006) One thousand consecutive pancreaticoduodenectomies. Ann Surg 244:10–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yeo CJ, Cameron JL, Lillemoe KD et al (2002) Pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without distal gastrectomy and extended retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma, part 2: randomized controlled trial evaluating survival, morbidity, and mortality. Ann Surg 236:355–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Andrén-Sandberg A, Neoptolemos JP (2002) Resection for pancreatic cancer in the new millennium. Pancreatology 2:431–439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adler G, Seufferlein T, Bischoff SC et al (2007) S3-Guidelines „Exocrine pancreatic cancer“ 2007. Z Gastroenterol 45:487–523

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Diener MK, Knaebel HP, Heukaufer C et al (2007) A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. Ann Surg 245:187–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Farnell MB, Pearson RK, Sarr MG et al (2005) A prospective randomized trial comparing standard pancreatoduodenectomy with pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy in resectable pancreatic head adenocarcinoma. Surgery 138:618–628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Michalski CW, Kleeff J, Wente MN et al (2007) Systematic review and meta-analysis of standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 94:265–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yekebas EF, Bogoevski D, Cataldegirmen G et al (2008) En bloc vascular resection for locally advanced pancreatic malignancies infiltrating major blood vessels: perioperative outcome and long-term survival in 136 patients. Ann Surg 247:300–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramacciato G, Mercantini P, Petrucciani N et al (2009) Does portal-superior mesenteric vein invasion still indicate irresectability for pancreatic carcinoma? Ann Surg Oncol 16:817–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nakao A, Takeda S, Inoue S et al (2006) Indications and techniques of extended resection for pancreatic cancer. World J Surg 30:976–982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shrikhande SV, Kleeff J, Reiser C et al (2007) Pancreatic resection for M1 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 14:118–127

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fernández-Cruz L, Cosa R, Blanco L et al (2008) Pancreatogastrostomy with gastric partition after pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy versus conventional pancreatojejunostomy: a prospective randomized study. Ann Surg 248:930–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bassi C, Falconi M, Molinari E et al (2005) Reconstruction by pancreaticojejunostomy versus pancreaticogastrostomy following pancreatectomy: results of a comparative study. Ann Surg 242:767–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Berger AC, Howard TJ, Kennedy EP et al (2009) Does type of pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy decrease rate of pancreatic fistula? A randomized, prospective, dual-institution trial. J Am Coll Surg 208:738–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gillen S, Schuster T, Meyer Zum Büschenfelde C et al (2010) Preoperative/neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of response and resection percentages. PLoS Med 7:e1000267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Oettle H, Post S, Neuhaus P, Gellert K et al (2007) Adjuvant chemotherapy with gemcitabine vs observation in patients undergoing curative-intent resection of pancreatic cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 297:267–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Neoptolemos JP, Stocken DD, Tudur Smith C et al (2009) Adjuvant 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid vs observation for pancreatic cancer: composite data from the ESPAC-1 and -3(v1) trials. Br J Cancer 100:246–250

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Moore MJ, Goldstein D, Hamm J et al (2007) Erlotinib plus gemcitabine compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase III trial of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol 25:1960–1966

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vaccaro V, Sperduti I, Milella M (2011) FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 365:768–769

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vincent A, Herman J, Schulick R et al (2011) Pancreatic cancer. Lancet 378:607–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Birkmeyer JD, Sun Y, Wong SL et al (2007) Hospital volume and late survival after cancer surgery. Ann Surg 245:777–783

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Winter C, Kristiansen G, Kersting S et al (2012) Google goes cancer: improving outcome prediction for cancer patients by network-based ranking of marker genes. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Grützmann R, Niedergethmann M, Pilarsky C et al (2010) Intraductal papillary mucinous tumors of the pancreas: biology, diagnosis, and treatment. Oncologist 15:1294–1309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Grützmann R, Saeger HD (2010) Cystic tumors of the pancreas. Chirurg 81:755–768

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Olive KP, Jacobetz MA, Davidson CJ et al (2009) Inhibition of Hedgehog signaling enhances delivery of chemotherapy in a mouse model of pancreatic cancer. Science 324:1457–1461

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pérez-Mancera PA, Rust AG, Weyden L van der et al (2012) The deubiquitinase USP9X suppresses pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Nature 486:266–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Interessenkonflikt

Der korrespondierende Autor gibt für sich und seinen Koautoren an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

The supplement this article is part of is not sponsored by the industry.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Grützmann.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Distler, M., Grützmann, R. Neue Aspekte in der Chirurgie des Pankreaskarzinoms. Pathologe 33 (Suppl 2), 258–265 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-012-1639-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00292-012-1639-z

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation