Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Elementary proof of convergence to the mean-field model for the SIR process

  • Published:
Journal of Mathematical Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The susceptible-infected-recovered (SIR) model has been used extensively to model disease spread and other processes. Despite the widespread usage of this ordinary differential equation (ODE) based model which represents the mean-field approximation of the underlying stochastic SIR process on contact networks, only few rigorous approaches exist and these use complex semigroup and martingale techniques to prove that the expected fraction of the susceptible and infected nodes of the stochastic SIR process on a complete graph converges as the number of nodes increases to the solution of the mean-field ODE model. Extending the elementary proof of convergence for the SIS process introduced by Armbruster and Beck (IMA J Appl Math, doi:10.1093/imamat/hxw010, 2016) to the SIR process, we show convergence using only a system of three ODEs, simple probabilistic inequalities, and basic ODE theory. Our approach can also be generalized to many other types of compartmental models (e.g., susceptible-infected-recovered-susceptible (SIRS)) which are linear ODEs with the addition of quadratic terms for the number of new infections similar to the SI term in the SIR model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson RM, May RM (1991) Infectious diseases of humans dynamics and control. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson H, Britton T (2000) Stochastic epidemic models and their statistical analysis. Lecture Notes in Statistics, chapter 5. Springer, New York

  • Armbruster B, Beck E (2016) An elementary proof of convergence to the mean-field equations for an epidemic model. IMA J Appl Math. doi:10.1093/imamat/hxw010

  • Benaïm M, Le Boudec J-Y (2008) A class of mean-field interaction models for computer and communication systems. Perform Eval 65(11–12):823–838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortolussi L, Hillston J, Latella D, Massink M (2013) Continuous approximation of collective system behavior: a tutorial. Perform Eval 70(5):317–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardelli L (2008) From processes to ODEs by chemistry. TCNature, International Federation for Information Processing, vol 273. Springer, Boston, pp 261–281

  • Daley D, Kendall D (1964) Epidemics and rumours. Nature 204(225):1118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daley D, Kendall D (1965) Stochastic rumors. IMA 1(1):42–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Decreusefond L, Dhersin J-S, Moyal P, Chi Tran V (2012) Large graph limit for an SIR process in random network with heterogeneous connectivity. Ann Appl Probab 22(2):541–575

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ethier SN, Kurtz TG (1986) Markov processes: characterization and convergence, chapter 11.2. Wiley series in probability and statistics. Wiley, Hoboken

  • Giraudo D (2014) Bound the variance of the product of two random varables. Mathematics Stack Exchange. http://math.stackexchange.com/q/1044864 (version: 2014-11-30)

  • Hale J (2009) Ordinary Differential equations, chapter 1.6. Dover Books on Mathematics Series. Dover Publications, Mineola

  • Keeling MJ (1999) The effects of local spatial structure on epidemiological invasions. Proc R Soc Lond B 266:859–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kephart J, White S (1993) Measuring and modeling computer virus prevalence. In: Proceedings, 1993 IEEE computer society symposium on research in security and privacy, pp 2–15

  • Kermack W, McKendrick A (1927) A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics. In: Proceedings of the royal society of London. series a: containing papers of a mathematical and physical character, vol. 115, No. 772, pp. 700–721

  • Kurtz TG (1970) Solutions of ordinary differential equations as limits of pure jump Markov processes. J Appl Probab 7:49–58

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz TG (1971) Limit theorems for sequences of jump Markov processes approximating ordinary differential processes. J Appl Probab 8(2):344–356

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • May RM, Anderson RM (1983) Epidemiology and genetics in the coevolution of parasites and hosts. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 219(1216):281–313

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rand DA (1999) Correlation equations and pair approximations for spatial ecologies. CWI Q 12(3&4):329–368

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ross S (2007) Introduction to probability models, chapter 6.4, 9th edn. Academic Press, San Diego

  • Simon PL, Kiss IZ (2012) From exact stochastic to mean-field ODE models: a case study of three different approaches to prove convergence results. IMA J Appl Math 78(5):945–964

  • Volz E (2008) SIR dynamics in random networks with heterogeneous connectivity. J Math Biol 56(3):293–310

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Peter L. Simon, Tom Britton, and two anonymous referees for helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ekkehard Beck.

Appendix

Appendix

Lemma 4 Consider the initial value problems \(x'=f_1(t,x)\), \(x(0)=x_1\) and \(x'=f_2(t,x)\), \(x(0)=x_2\) with solutions \(\varphi _1(t)\) and \(\varphi _2(t)\) respectively. If \(f_1\) is Lipschitz in x with constant L and \(\left||f_1(t,x)-f_2(t,x)\right||\le M\), then \(\left||\varphi _1(t)-\varphi _2(t)\right||\le (\left||x_1-x_2\right||+M/L)e^{Lt}-M/L\).

Proof

Using the integral form of the differential equations,

$$\begin{aligned} \left||\varphi _1(t)-\varphi _2(t)\right|| = \left|| x_1-x_2+\int _0^t f_1(u,\varphi _1(u)) du - \int _0^t f_2(u,\varphi _2(u)) du\right||. \end{aligned}$$

Using the triangle inequality,

$$\begin{aligned} \left||\varphi _1(t)-\varphi _2(t)\right|| \le \left||x_1-x_2\right||+\left||\int _0^t f_1(u,\varphi _1(u)) du - \int _0^t f_2(u,\varphi _2(u)) du\right||. \end{aligned}$$

Using the integral form of the triangle inequality,

$$\begin{aligned} \left||\varphi _1(t)-\varphi _2(t)\right|| \le \left|| x_1-x_2\right|| + \int _0^t \left||f_1(u,\varphi _1(u)) - f_2(u,\varphi _2(u))\right|| du. \end{aligned}$$

Applying the triangle inequality again,

$$\begin{aligned}&\le \left|| x_1-x_2\right||+\int _0^t \bigl (\left||f_1(u,\varphi _1(u))-f_1(u,\varphi _2(u))\right|| + \left||f_1(u,\varphi _2(u))-f_2(u,\varphi _2(u))\right||\bigr ) du. \end{aligned}$$

Applying the assumptions of this lemma,

$$\begin{aligned} \left||\varphi _1(t)-\varphi _2(t)\right|| \le \left|| x_1-x_2\right|| + \int _0^t (L \left||\varphi _1(u)-\varphi _2(u)\right|| + M) du. \end{aligned}$$

Applying a specialized form of Gronwall’s inequality then proves the claim.

Lemma 5

(Gronwall’s Inequality) Suppose for \(t\ge 0\), that \(\theta (t)\) is a continuous nonnegative function; \(L,M\ge 0\); and \(\theta (t)\le \theta (0)+\int _0^t (L\theta (u)+M) du\). Then for \(t\ge 0\), \(\theta \) is bounded by the solution to the initial value problem \(x'=Lx+M\), \(x(0)=\theta (0)\):

$$\begin{aligned} \theta (t) \le (\theta (0)+M/L)e^{Lt}-M/L. \end{aligned}$$

Proof

This result can be found in any graduate ODE text such as Lemma 6.2 in Hale (2009).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Armbruster, B., Beck, E. Elementary proof of convergence to the mean-field model for the SIR process. J. Math. Biol. 75, 327–339 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-016-1086-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-016-1086-1

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation