Skip to main content
Log in

Genome Shuffling of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia OK-5 for Improving the Degradation of Explosive RDX (Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine)

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A genome-shuffled Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strain showing the enhanced ability of RDX degradation was constructed, and its characteristics were compared with those of the wild-type one. The shuffled strain was able to completely degrade 25, 50, and 75 µM RDX (hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine) within 10, 30, and 50 days, respectively. However, it took 30 and 70 days for the wild-type strain to degrade 25 and 50 µM RDX, respectively, and at day 70, the strain degraded only 67% of 75 µM RDX. The shuffled strain reached its maximum growth at 50–60 days and exhibited approximately 1.5-fold increased cell numbers. SEM revealed more severe damage on the surface of the wild-type cells compared to the genome-shuffled cells. The mRNA levels of dnaK and groEL encoding the heat shock proteins were increased by 2.5-fold and fourfold, and DnaK and GroEL proteins were more highly produced in the shuffled cells. In addition, the mRNA levels of pnrB encoding a TNT nitroreductase, and algA involved in exopolymer biosynthesis, were slightly higher in the shuffled strain, but not as high as those of dnaK and groEL. These results indicate that the genome shuffling rendered the shuffled cells more resistant to RDX stress. A proteomic comparison revealed changes in the production levels of certain proteins including nitrate and cell protection, particularly those involved in metabolism. These proteomic analyses provide clues for understanding the improved RDX degradation by the genome-shuffled S. maltophilia strain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Best EP, Geter KN, Tatem HE, Lane BK (2006) Effects, transfer, and fate of RDX from aged soil in plants and worms. Chemosphere 62:616–625

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Binks PR, Nicklin S, Bruce NC (1995) Degradation of hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX) by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia PB1. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1318–1322

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Biot-Pelletier D, Martin VJ (2014) Evolutionary engineering by genome shuffling. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 98:3877–3887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bollag DM, Rozycki MD, Edelstein SJ (1996) Protein methods, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chalopagorn P, Charoenpanich J, Choowongkomon K (2014) Genome shuffling enhances lipase production of thermophilic Geobacillus sp. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 174:1444–1454

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chang HW, Kahng HY, Kim SI, Chun JW, Oh KH (2004) Characterization of Pseudomonas sp. HK-6 cells responding to explosive RDX (hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 65:323–329

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cho SH, Cho YS, Oh KH (2009) Biological treatment of TNT containing wastewater, pink water by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia OK-5, and RT-PCR quantification of the nitroreductase (pnrB) gene. Kor J Biotechnol Eng 24:556–562

    Google Scholar 

  8. Coretzee JN, Sirgel FA, Lecatsas G (1979) Genetic recombination in fused spheroplast of Providence alcalifaciens. J Gen Microbiol 114:313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Copley S (2009) Evolution of efficient pathways for degradation of anthropogenic chemicals. Nat Chem Biol 5:559–566

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Fournier D, Halasz A, Spain J, Spanggord RJ, Bottaro JC, Hawari J (2004) Biodegradation of the hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine ring cleavage product 4-nitro-2,4-diazabutanal by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:1123–1128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Gacesa P (1998) Bacterial alginate biosynthesis-recent progress and future prospects. Microbiology 144:1133–1143

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Haas R, Schreiber I, von LöwE Stork G (1990) Conception for the investigation of contaminated munitions plants, 2: investigation of former RDX plants and filling stations. Anal Bioanal Chem 338:41–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Heukeshoven J, Dernick R (1985) Simplified method for silver staining of proteins in polyacrylamide gels and the mechanism of silver staining. Electrophoresis 6:103–112

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ho EM, Chang HW, Kim SI, Kahng HY, Oh KH (2004) Analysis of TNT (2,4,6-trinitrotoluene)-inducible cellular responses and stress shock proteome in Stenotrophomonas sp. OK-5. Curr Microbiol 49:346–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hou LH, Meng M, Guo L, He JY (2015) A comparison of whole cell directed evolution approaches in breeding of industrial strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Lett 37:1393–1398

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan MI, Lee J, Park J (2012) Microbial degradation and toxicity of hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine. J Microbiol Biotechnol 22:1321–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kwon MJ, Wei N, Millerick K, Popovic J, Finneran K (2014) Clostridium geopurificans strain MJ1 sp. nov., a strictly anaerobic bacterium that grows via fermentation and reduces the cyclic nitramine explosive hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX). Curr Microbiol 68:743–750

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee BU, Park SC, Cho YS, Kahng HY, Oh KH (2008) Expression and characterization of the TNT nitroreductase of Pseudomonas sp. HK-6 in Escherichia coli. Curr Microbiol 56:386–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee BU, Park SC, Cho YS, Oh KH (2008) Exopolymer biosynthesis and proteomic changes of Pseudomonas sp. HK-6 under stress of TNT (2,4,6-trinitrotoluene). Curr Microbiol 57:477–483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee BU, Cho YS, Park SC, Oh KH (2009) Enhanced degradation of TNT by genome-shuffled Stenotrophomonas maltophilia OK-5. Curr Microbiol 59:346–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nejidat A, Kafka L, Tekoah Y, Ronen Z (2008) Effect of organic and inorganic nitrogenous compounds on RDX degradation and cytochrome P450 expression in Rhodococcus strain YH1. Biodegradation 19:313–320

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ng LK, Sherburne R, Taylor DE, Stiles ME (1985) Morphological forms and viability of Campylobacter species studied by electron microscopy. J Bacteriol 164:338–343

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Pertins DN, Pappin DJ, Creasy DM, Cottrell JS (1999) Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis 20:3551–3567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ramos JL, Duque E, Huertas MJ, Haidour A (1995) Isolation and expression of catabolic potential of a Pseudomonas putida strain able to grow in presence of high concentrations of aromatic hydrocarbons. J Bacteriol 177:3911–3916

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Rosenblatt DH, Burrows EP, Mitchell WR, Parme DL (1991) Organic explosive and related compounds. In: Hutzinger O (ed) Handbook of environmental chemistry. Springer, Berlin, pp 195–234

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rylott EL, Budarina MV, Barker A, Lorenz A, Strand SE (2011) Engineering plants for the phytoremediation of RDX in the presence of the co-contaminating explosive TNT. New Phytol 192:405–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sikkema J, de Bont JA, Poolman B (1995) Mechanisms of membrane toxicity of hydrocarbons. Microbiol Rev 59:201–222

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Stewart V (1982) Requirement of Fnr and NarL functions for nitrate reductase expression in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 151:1320–1325

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yinon J (1990) Toxicity and metabolism of explosives. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang YX, Perry K, Vinci VA, Powell K, Stemmer WP (2002) Genome shuffling leads to rapid phenotypic improvement in bacteria. Nature 415:644–646

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhou YP, Ren XD, Wang L, Chen XS, Mao ZG (2015) Enhancement of ε-poly-lysine production in ε-poly-lysine-tolerant Streptomyces sp. by genome shuffling. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 38:1705–1713

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea, funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2011-0026690), and by the Soonchunhyang University Research Fund. We thank the ROK Agency for Defense Development for providing the RDX used in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kye-Heon Oh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, BU., Choi, MS., Kim, DM. et al. Genome Shuffling of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia OK-5 for Improving the Degradation of Explosive RDX (Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine). Curr Microbiol 74, 268–276 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-016-1179-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00284-016-1179-5

Keywords

Navigation