Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy and safety of postoperative bio-chemoradiotherapy using cetuximab and docetaxel for high-risk head and neck cancer patients in Japan

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To confirm the efficacy and safety of cetuximab and docetaxel in postoperative radiotherapy for high-risk head and neck cancer patients who cannot to be administered high-dose cisplatin.

Patients and methods

The eligibility criteria required stage III–IVB head and neck cancer patients who had undergone total resection, and for whom pathological evaluation revealed positive or close margins in the primary site and/or extracapsular nodal extension and/or two or more nodal metastases. In each case, the patients general condition prevented the use of high-dose cisplatin. Instead, they received cetuximab and docetaxel every week during a 66.6 Gy course of postoperative radiotherapy.

Results

Eleven patients were enrolled; the median follow-up period was 22 months, and the 1- and 2-year disease free survival rates were 91 and 55%, respectively. Grade 3 adverse events included oral mucositis, radiation dermatitis, reduced white blood cell and neutrophil counts, lung infection, aspiration, and hyponatremia; however, no grade 4 adverse events were observed.

Conclusion

Administration of cetuximab and docetaxel during postoperative radiotherapy for high-risk poor condition head and neck cancer patients in poor general condition was both feasible and tolerable. With the safety of this treatment confirmed, we propose a phase trail to further clarify the efficacy of cetuximab and docetaxel use for high-risk cisplatin-intolerant patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooper JS, Pajak TF, Forastiere AA et al (2004) Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 350:1937–1944

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernier J, Domange C, Ozsahin M et al (2004) Postoperative irradiation with or without concomitant chemotherapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 350:1945–1952

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernier J, Cooper JS, Pajak TF et al (2005) Defining risk levels in locally advanced head and neck cancers: a comparative analysis of concurrent postoperative radiation plus chemotherapy trials of the EORTC (#22931) and RTOG #9501). Head Neck 27:843–850

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harari PM, Harris J, Kies MS et al (2014) Postoperative chemoradiotherapy and cetuximab for high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: radiation therapy oncology group RTOG-0234. J Clin Oncol 32:2486–2495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nishimura G, Tsukuda M, Horiuchi C et al (2007) Decrease of creatinine clearance rate with ageing in patients with head and neck cancer in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 12:120–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hori M, Matsuda T, Shibata A et al (2015) Cancer incidence and incidence rate in Japan in 2009: a study of 32 population-based cancer registries for the Monitoring of Cancer Incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol 45:884–891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cancer Registry and Statistics. Cancer Information Service, National Cancer Center, Japan. http://ganjoho.jp/reg_stat/

  8. Tupchong L, Scott CB, Blitzer PH et al (1991) Randomized study of preoperative versus postoperative radiation therapy in advanced head and neck carcinoma: long-term follow-up of RTOG study 73-03. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 20:21–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Peters LJ, Goepfert H, Ang KK et al (1993) Evaluation of the dose for postoperative radiation therapy of head and neck cancer: first report of a prospective randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 26:3–11

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J et al (2006) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med 354:567–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J et al (2010) Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncol 11:21–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vermorken JB, Mesia R, Rivera F et al (2008) Platinum-based chemotherapy plus cetuximab in head and neck cancer. N Engl J Med 359:1116–1127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakata E, Hunter N, Mason K et al (2004) C225 antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody enhances the efficacy of docetaxel chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:1163–1173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Goshi Nishimura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishimura, G., Shiono, O., Sano, D. et al. Efficacy and safety of postoperative bio-chemoradiotherapy using cetuximab and docetaxel for high-risk head and neck cancer patients in Japan. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 80, 203–207 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3352-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-017-3352-3

Keywords

Navigation