Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Role of adjuvant therapy after R0 resection for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The optimal treatment strategy for cholangiocarcinoma (CC) after curative resection remains controversial. The aim of this study was to analyze the role of adjuvant therapy in R0-resected distal CC.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent R0 resection for distal CC at six cancer centers in Korea. Adjuvant therapy consisted of chemotherapy (CT), chemoradiotherapy (CRT), or radiotherapy (RT). The outcomes of the study were overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Results

A total of 158 patients were included in the analysis; 47 patients (29.7 %) had lymph node involvement. Fifty-six patients (35.4 %) received adjuvant therapy (CT/CRT/RT: 27/20/9, respectively). Patients with advanced TNM stage (P < 0.001), T3/T4 disease (P = 0.009), positive lymph nodes (LN; P = 0.052), and elevated baseline carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (P = 0.071) were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy. The effect of adjuvant therapy varied according to treatment modality. A multivariable analysis showed a significant improvement in OS after CT [hazard ratio (HR) 0.21, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.08–0.53, P = 0.001] and CRT (HR 0.25, 95 % CI 0.08–0.83, P = 0.024). However, RT alone was associated with shorter OS (HR 2.38, P = 0.040), along with T3/T4 disease (HR 2.12, P = 0.012) and positive LN (HR 2.30, P = 0.008). RFS benefited from adjuvant treatment with CT (HR 0.34, P = 0.002) and CRT (HR 0.33, P = 0.004), but not with RT alone (HR 1.42, P = 0.361). In the subset analysis according to LN status, adjuvant therapy not including RT alone was associated with a significant OS and RFS advantage in both LN-negative and LN-positive patients.

Conclusions

Our results show that patients receiving CT or CRT had significant improvements in OS and RFS. In addition, a benefit of adjuvant therapy (except RT alone) was observed even in LN-negative patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, Jemal A (2014) Cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64:9–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson CD, Pinson CW, Berlin J, Chari RS (2004) Diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Oncologist 9:43–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nakeeb A, Pitt HA (2005) Radiation therapy, chemotherapy and chemoradiation in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB (Oxford) 7:278–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams TM, Majithia L, Wang SJ, Thomas CR Jr (2014) Defining the role of adjuvant therapy: cholangiocarcinoma and gall bladder cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 24:94–104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Horgan AM, Amir E, Walter T, Knox JJ (2012) Adjuvant therapy in the treatment of biliary tract cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol 30:1934–1940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Macias RIR (2014) Cholangiocarcinoma: biology, clinical management, and pharmacological perspectives. ISRN Hepatol 2014:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kwon HJ, Kim SG, Chun JM, Lee WK, Hwang YJ (2014) Prognostic factors in patients with middle and distal bile duct cancers. World J Gastroenterol 20:6658–6665

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. DeOliveira ML, Cunningham SC, Cameron JL, Kamangar F, Winter JM, Lillemoe KD, Choti MA, Yeo CJ, Schulick RD (2007) Cholangiocarcinoma: thirty-one-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution. Ann Surg 245:755–762

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Heron DE, Stein DE, Eschelman DJ, Topham AK, Waterman FM, Rosato EL, Alden M, Anne PR (2003) Cholangiocarcinoma: the impact of tumor location and treatment strategy on outcome. Am J Clin Oncol 26:422–428

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoshida T, Matsumoto T, Sasaki A, Morii Y, Aramaki M, Kitano S (2002) Prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for distal bile duct cancer. Arch Surg 137:69–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng Q, Luo X, Zhang B, Jiang X, Yi B, Wu M (2007) Distal bile duct carcinoma: prognostic factors after curative surgery. A series of 112 cases. Ann Surg Oncol 14:1212–1219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murakami Y, Uemura K, Hayashidani Y, Sudo T, Hashimoto Y, Ohge H, Sueda T (2007) Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis and surgical margin status for distal cholangiocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol 95:207–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shinohara ET, Mitra N, Guo M, Metz JM (2009) Radiotherapy is associated with improved survival in adjuvant and palliative treatment of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 74:1191–1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kiriyama M, Ebata T, Aoba T, Kaneoka Y, Arai T, Shimizu Y, Nagino M (2015) Prognostic impact of lymph node metastasis in distal cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Surg 102:399–406

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kloek JJ, Ten Kate FJ, Busch OR, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM (2008) Surgery for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: predictors of survival. HPB (Oxford) 10:190–195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to In Gyu Hwang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, Y.S., Hwang, I.G., Park, SE. et al. Role of adjuvant therapy after R0 resection for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 77, 979–985 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3014-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-016-3014-x

Keywords

Navigation