Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A phase 1/2 study of oral panobinostat combined with melphalan for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Panobinostat is a histone deacetylase inhibitor that has shown synergistic preclinical anti-myeloma activity when combined with other agents, recently exhibiting synergy with the alkylating agent melphalan (Sanchez et al., Leuk Res 35(3):373–379, 2011). This phase 1/2 trial investigated the safety and efficacy of panobinostat in combination with melphalan for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients. There were four different trial treatment schedules due to tolerability issues, with the final treatment schedule (treatment schedule D) consisting of panobinostat (15 or 20 mg) and melphalan (0.05 or 0.10 mg/kg), both administered on days 1, 3, and 5 of a 28-day cycle. A total of 40 patients were enrolled; 3 in treatment schedule A, 9 in schedule B, 7 in schedule C, and finally 21 schedule D. Patients had been treated with a median of four regimens (range, 1–16) and two prior bortezomib-containing regimens (range, 0–9). Maximum-tolerated dose was established at 20 mg panobinostat and 0.05 mg/kg melphalan in treatment schedule D. Overall, 3 patients (7.5 %) achieved ≥partial response (two very good PRs and one PR) while 23 exhibited stable disease and 14 showed progressive disease. All three responders were enrolled in cohort 2 of treatment schedule B (panobinostat 20 mg thrice weekly continuously with melphalan 0.05 mg/kg on days 1, 3, and 5). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were common, with 30.8 and 23.1 % of patients exhibiting ≥grade 3, respectively. Panobinostat + melphalan appears to have tolerability issues in a dosing regimen capable of producing a response. Care must be taken to balance tolerability and efficacy with this combination.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sanchez E, Shen J, Steinberg J, Li M, Wang C, Bonavida B, Chen H, Li Z-W, Berenson JR (2011) The histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589 enhances the anti-myeloma effects of chemotherapy in vitro and in vivo. Leuk Res 35(3):373–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A (2012) Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 62(1):10–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dimopoulos MA, San-Miguel JF, Anderson KC (2011) Emerging therapies for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol 86(1):1–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Zeldenrust SR, Dingli D, Russell SJ, Lust JA, Greipp PR, Kyle RA, Gertz MA (2008) Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood 111(5):2516–2520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smith LT, Otterson GA, Plass C (2007) Unraveling the epigenetic code of cancer for therapy. Trends Genet 23(9):449–456

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahlknecht U, Hoelzer D (2000) Histone acetylation modifiers in the pathogenesis of malignant disease. Mol Med 6(8):623–644

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Pan LN, Lu J, Huang B (2007) HDAC inhibitors: a potential new category of anti-tumor agents. Cell Mol Immunol 4(5):337–343

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mitsiades CS, Hayden PJ, Anderson KC, Richardson PG (2007) From the bench to the bedside: emerging new treatments in multiple myeloma. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 20(4):797–816

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Prince HM, Bishton MJ, Harrison SJ (2009) Clinical Studies of Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res 15(12):3958–3969

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia-Manero G, Yang H, Bueso-Ramos C, Ferrajoli A, Cortes J, Wierda WG, Faderl S, Koller C, Morris G, Rosner G, Loboda A, Fantin VR, Randolph SS, Hardwick JS, Reilly JF, Chen C, Ricker JL, Secrist JP, Richon VM, Frankel SR, Kantarjian HM (2008) Phase 1 study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]) in patients with advanced leukemias and myelodysplastic syndromes. Blood 111(3):1060–1066

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Giles F, Fischer T, Cortes J, Garcia-Manero G, Beck J, Ravandi F, Masson E, Rae P, Laird G, Sharma S, Kantarjian H, Dugan M, Albitar M, Bhalla K (2006) A phase I study of intravenous LBH589, a novel cinnamic hydroxamic acid analogue histone deacetylase inhibitor, in patients with refractory hematologic malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 12(15):4628–4635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Catley L, Weisberg E, Tai Y-T, Atadja P, Remiszewski S, Hideshima T, Mitsiades N, Shringarpure R, LeBlanc R, Chauhan D, Munshi NC, Schlossman R, Richardson P, Griffin J, Anderson KC (2003) NVP-LAQ824 is a potent novel histone deacetylase inhibitor with significant activity against multiple myeloma. Blood 102(7):2615–2622

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Deleu S, Lemaire M, Arts J, Menu E, Van Valckenborgh E, Broek IV, De Raeve H, Les C, Van Camp B, Croucher P, Vanderkerken K (2009) Bortezomib alone or in combination with the histone deacetylase inhibitor JNJ-26481585: effect on myeloma bone disease in the 5T2MM murine model of myeloma. Cancer Res 69(13):5307–5311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Campbell RA, Sanchez E, Steinberg J, Shalitin D, Li Z-W, Chen H, Berenson JR (2010) Vorinostat enhances the antimyeloma effects of melphalan and bortezomib. Eur J Haematol 84(3):201–211

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Badros A, Burger AM, Philip S, Niesvizky R, Kolla SS, Goloubeva O, Harris C, Zwiebel J, Wright JJ, Espinoza-Delgado I, Baer MR, Holleran JL, Egorin MJ, Grant S (2009) Phase I study of vorinostat in combination with bortezomib for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res 15(16):5250–5257

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dimopoulos M, Jagannath S, Yoon S, Siegel D, Lonial S, Qi J, Hajek R, Facon T, Rosinol L, Williams CB, Blacklock H, Goldschmidt H, Hungria V, Spencer A, Palumbo A, Reece D, Graef T, Houp J, Sun L, Eid J, Anderson K (2012) Vantage 088: final results from the global phase 3 trial of the multi-histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in combination with bortezomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Haematologica 97(113):281

    Google Scholar 

  17. Galli M, Salmoiraghi S, Golay J, Gozzini A, Crippa C, Pescosta N, Rambaldi A (2010) A phase II multiple dose clinical trial of histone deacetylase inhibitor ITF2357 in patients with relapsed or progressive multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol 89(2):185–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Maiso P, Carvajal-Vergara X, Ocio EM, López-Pérez R, Mateo G, Gutiérrez N, Atadja P, Pandiella A, San Miguel JF (2006) The histone deacetylase inhibitor LBH589 is a potent antimyeloma agent that overcomes drug resistance. Cancer Res 66(11):5781–5789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Atadja P (2009) Development of the pan-DAC inhibitor panobinostat (LBH589): successes and challenges. Cancer Lett 280(2):233–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Prince HM, Bishton MJ, Johnstone RW (2009) Panobinostat (LBH589): a potent pan-deacetylase inhibitor with promising activity against hematologic and solid tumors. Future Oncol 5(5):601–612

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dickinson M, Ritchie D, DeAngelo DJ, Spencer A, Ottmann OG, Fischer T, Bhalla KN, Liu A, Parker K, Scott JW, Bishton M, Prince HM (2009) Preliminary evidence of disease response to the pan deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat (LBH589) in refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma. Br J Haematol 147(1):97–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dimicoli S, Jabbour E, Borthakur G, Kadia T, Estrov Z, Yang H, Kelly M, Pierce S, Kantarjian H, Garcia-Manero G (2012) Phase II study of the histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat (LBH589) in patients with low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome. Am J Hematol 87(1):127–129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ellis L, Pan Y, Smyth GK, George DJ, McCormack C, Williams-Truax R, Mita M, Beck J, Burris H, Ryan G, Atadja P, Butterfoss D, Dugan M, Culver K, Johnstone RW, Prince HM (2008) Histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat induces clinical responses with associated alterations in gene expression profiles in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Clin Cancer Res 14(14):4500–4510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ghobrial IM, Campigotto F, Murphy TJ, Boswell EN, Banwait R, Azab F, Chuma S, Kunsman J, Donovan A, Masood F, Warren D, Rodig S, Anderson KC, Richardson PG, Weller E, Matous J (2013) Results of a phase 2 trial of the single-agent histone deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat in patients with relapsed/refractory Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Blood 121(8):1296–1303

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Deangelo DJ, Spencer A, Bhalla KN, Prince HM, Fischer T, Kindler T, Giles FJ, Scott JW, Parker K, Liu A, Woo M, Atadja P, Mishra KK, Ottmann OG (2013) Phase Ia/II, two-arm, open-label, dose-escalation study of oral panobinostat administered via two dosing schedules in patients with advanced hematologic malignancies. Leukemia (in press)

  26. Wolf JL, Siegel D, Goldschmidt H, Hazell K, Bourquelot PM, Bengoudifa BR, Matous J, Vij R, de Magalhaes-Silverman M, Abonour R, Anderson KC, Lonial S (2012) Phase II trial of the pan-deacetylase inhibitor panobinostat as a single agent in advanced relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 53(9):1820–1823

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Catley L, Weisberg E, Kiziltepe T, Tai Y-T, Hideshima T, Neri P, Tassone P, Atadja P, Chauhan D, Munshi NC, Anderson KC (2006) Aggresome induction by proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and alpha-tubulin hyperacetylation by tubulin deacetylase (TDAC) inhibitor LBH589 are synergistic in myeloma cells. Blood 108(10):3441–3449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ocio EM, Vilanova D, Atadja P, Maiso P, Crusoe E, Fernández-Lázaro D, Garayoa M, San-Segundo L, Hernández-Iglesias T, de Alava E, Shao W, Yao Y-M, Pandiella A, San-Miguel JF (2010) In vitro and in vivo rationale for the triple combination of panobinostat (LBH589) and dexamethasone with either bortezomib or lenalidomide in multiple myeloma. haematol 95(5):794–803

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. San-Miguel JF, Sezer O, Siegel DS, Guenther A, Blade J, Prosser IW, Bengoudifa B, Klebsattel M, Bourquelot PM, Anderson KC (2010) Phase Ib study of oral panobinostat (LBH589) plus intravenous bortezomib in patients (Pts) with relapsed (Rel) or Rel and refractory (Ref) multiple myeloma (MM). ASCO Meet Abstr 28(15):8001

    Google Scholar 

  30. Richardson PG, Schlossman RL, Alsina M, Weber DM, Coutre SE, Gasparetto C, Mukhopadhyay S, Ondovik MS, Khan M, Paley CS, Lonial S (2013) PANORAMA 2: panobinostat in combination with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed and bortezomib-refractory myeloma. Blood (in press)

  31. San-Miguel JF, de Moraes Hungria VT, Yoon S-S, Wiktor-Jedrzejczak W, Elghandour A, Siritanaratkul N, Dimopoulos MA, Corradini P, Nakorn TN, Shelekhova T, Günther A, Yong K, Schlossman R, Wroclawska-Swacha M, Weber H-J, Bourquelot P, Hou J, Einsele H, Lee JH, Moreau P, Lonial S, Richardson PG (2011) Update on a phase III study of panobinostat with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: PANORAMA 1. ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts 118(21):3976–3976

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mateos M, Spencer A, Taylor K, Lonial S, De La Rubia J, Facon T, Bengoudifa B, Hazell K, Bourquelot PM, San-Miguel JF (2010) Phase Ib study of oral panobinostat (LBH589) plus lenalidomide (LEN) plus dexamethasone (DEX) in patients (Pts) with relapsed (Rel) or Rel and refractory (Ref) multiple myeloma (MM). J Clin Oncol 28(15):8030

    Google Scholar 

  33. Offidani M, Polloni C, Cavallo F, Liberati AM, Ballanti S, Pulini S, Catarini M, Alesiani F, Corvatta L, Gentili S, Caraffa P, Boccadoro M, Leoni P, Palumbo A (2012) Phase II study of melphalan, thalidomide and prednisone combined with oral panobinostat in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Leuk Lymphoma 53(9):1722–1727

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Blade J, Samson D, Reece D, Apperley J, Björkstrand B, Gahrton G, Gertz M, Giralt S, Jagannath S, Vesole D (1998) Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Myeloma Subcommittee of the EBMT. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant. Br J Haematol 102(5):1115–1123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Berenson JR, Yellin O, Chen C-S, Patel R, Bessudo A, Boccia RV, Yang HH, Vescio R, Yung E, Mapes R, Eades B, Hilger JD, Wirtschafter E, Hilger J, Nassir Y, Swift RA (2011) A modified regimen of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, bortezomib and dexamethasone (DVD) is effective and well tolerated for previously untreated multiple myeloma patients. Br J Haematol 155(5):580–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Shellie Rothstein for assistance throughout the trial and Fritz Costa and Melissa Kalbarczyk for invaluable assistance with data management and entry.

Conflict of interest disclosure

JRB is a member of the speakers bureau for Norvatis and acknowledges consulting and research funds from Novartis. RVB is a member of the speakers bureau for Novartis. RAS is a member of speakers bureau and advisory board for Novartis. The rest of the authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James R. Berenson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berenson, J.R., Hilger, J.D., Yellin, O. et al. A phase 1/2 study of oral panobinostat combined with melphalan for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol 93, 89–98 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-013-1910-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-013-1910-2

Keywords

Navigation