Abstract
During last years, molecular markers have been increased as prognostic factors routinely screened in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Recently, an increasing interest has been reported in introducing to clinical practice screening for mutations in the CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein α (CEBPA) gene in AML, as it seems to be a good prognostic factor. However, there is no reliable established method for assessing CEBPA mutations during the diagnostic work-up of AMLs. We describe here a straightforward and reliable fragment analysis method based in PCR capillary electrophoresis (PCR-CE) for screening of CEBPA mutations; moreover, we present the results obtained in 151 intermediate-risk karyotype AML patients (aged 16–80 years). The method gave a specificity of 100% and sensitivity of 93% with a lower detection limit of 1–5% for CEBPA mutations. The series found 19 mutations and four polymorphisms in 12 patients, seven of whom (58%) presented two mutations. The overall frequency of CEBPA mutations in AML was 8% (n = 12). CEBPA mutations showed no coincidence with FLT3-ITD or NPM1 mutations. CEBPA mutation predicted better disease-free survival in the group of patients without FLT3-ITD, NPM, or both genes mutated (HR 3.6, IC 95%; 1.0–13.2, p = 0.05) and better overall survival in patients younger than 65 of this group without molecular markers (HR 4.0, IC 95%; 1.0–17.4, p = 0.05). In conclusion, the fragment analysis method based in PCR-CE is a rapid, specific, and sensitive method for CEBPA mutation screening and our results confirm that CEBPA mutations can identify a subgroup of patients with favorable prognosis in AML with intermediate-risk karyotype.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Thiede C, Steudel C, Mohr B, Schaich M, Schäkel U, Platzbecker U, Wermke M, Bornhäuser M, Ritter M, Neubauer A, Ehninger G, Illmer T (2002) Analysis of FLT3-activating mutations in 979 patients with acute myelogenous leukemia: association with FAB subtypes and identification of subgroups with poor prognosis. Blood 99:4326–4335
Falini B, Mecucci C, Tiacci E, Alcalay M, Rosati R, Pasqualucci L, La Starza R, Diverio D, Colombo E, Santucci A, Bigerna B, Pacini R, Pucciarini A, Liso A, Vignetti M, Fazi P, Meani N, Pettirossi V, Saglio G, Mandelli F, Lo-Coco F, Pelicci PG, Martelli MF (2005) GIMEMA acute leukemia working party. Nucleophosmin in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype. N Engl J Med 352:254–266
Löwenberg B (2008) Diagnosis and prognosis in acute myeloid leukemia—the art of distinction. N Engl J Med 358:1960–1962
Renneville A, Roumier C, Biggio V, Nibourel O, Boissel N, Fenaux P, Preudhomme C (2008) Cooperating gene mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: a review of the literature. Leukemia 22:915–931
Radomska HS, Huettner CS, Zhang P, Cheng T, Scadden DT, Tenen DG (1998) CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha is a regulatory switch sufficient for induction of granulocytic development from bipotential myeloid progenitors. Mol Cell Biol 18:4301–4314
Tenen DG, Hromas R, Licht JD, Zhang DE (1997) Transcription factors, normal myeloid development, and leukemia. Blood 90:489–519
Zhang DE, Zhang P, Wang ND, Hetherington CJ, Darlington GJ, Tenen DG (1997) Absence of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor signaling and neutrophil development in CCAAT enhancer binding protein alpha-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:569–574
Zhang P, Iwasaki-Arai J, Iwasaki H, Fenyus ML, Dayaram T, Owens BM, Shigematsu H, Levantini E, Huettner CS, Lekstrom-Himes JA, Akashi K, Tenen DG (2004) Enhancement of hematopoietic stem cell repopulating capacity and self-renewal in the absence of the transcription factor C/EBP alpha. Immunity 21:853–863
Pabst T, Mueller BU, Zhang P, Radomska HS, Narravula S, Schnittger S, Behre G, Hiddemann W, Tenen DG (2001) Dominant-negative mutations of CEBPA, encoding CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha (C/EBPalpha), in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Genet 27:263–270
Pabst T, Mueller BU (2007) Transcriptional dysregulation during myeloid transformation in AML. Oncogene 26:6829–6837
van Waalwijk B, van Doorn-Khosrovani S, Erpelinck C, Meijer J, van Oosterhoud S, van Putten WL, Valk PJ, Berna Beverloo H, Tenen DG, Löwenberg B, Delwel R (2003) Biallelic mutations in the CEBPA gene and low CEBPA expression levels as prognostic markers in intermediate-risk AML. Hematol J 4:31–40
Marcucci G, Maharry K, Radmacher MD, Mrózek K, Vukosavljevic T, Paschka P, Whitman SP, Langer C, Baldus CD, Liu CG, Ruppert AS, Powell BL, Carroll AJ, Caligiuri MA, Kolitz JE, Larson RA, Bloomfield CD (2008) Prognostic significance of, and gene and microRNA expression signatures associated with, CEBPA mutations in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia with high-risk molecular features: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study. J Clin Oncol 26:5078–5087
Green CL, Koo KK, Hills RK, Burnett AK, Lynch DC, Gale RE (2010) Prognostic significance of CEBPA mutations in a large cohort of younger adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: impact of double CEBPA mutations and the interaction with FLT3 and NPM1 mutations. J Clin Oncol 28:2739–2747
Wouters BJ, Löwenberg B, Erpelinck-Verschueren CA, van Putten WL, Valk PJ, Delwel R (2009) Double CEBPA mutations, but not single CEBPA mutations, define a subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia with a distinctive gene expression profile that is uniquely associated with a favorable outcome. Blood 113:3088–3091
Snaddon J, Smith ML, Neat M, Cambal-Parrales M, Dixon-McIver A, Arch R, Amess JA, Rohatiner AZ, Lister TA, Fitzgibbon J (2003) Mutations of CEBPA in acute myeloid leukemia FAB types M1 and M2. Genes Chromosom Cancer 37:72–78
Benthaus T, Schneider F, Mellert G, Zellmeier E, Schneider S, Kakadia PM, Hiddemann W, Bohlander SK, Feuring-Buske M, Braess J, Spiekermann K, Dufour A (2008) Rapid and sensitive screening for CEBPA mutations in acute myeloid leukaemia. Br J Haematol 143:230–239
Lin LI, Lin TC, Chou WC, Tang JL, Lin DT, Tien HF (2006) A novel fluorescence-based multiplex PCR assay for rapid simultaneous detection of CEBPA mutations and NPM mutations in patients with acute myeloid leukemias. Leukemia 20:1899–1903
Fröhling S, Schlenk RF, Stolze I, Bihlmayr J, Benner A, Kreitmeier S, Tobis K, Döhner H, Döhner K (2004) CEBPA mutations in younger adults with acute myeloid leukemia and normal cytogenetics: prognostic relevance and analysis of cooperating mutations. J Clin Oncol 22:624–633
Lin LI, Chen CY, Lin DT, Tsay W, Tang JL, Yeh YC, Shen HL, Su FH, Yao M, Huang SY, Tien HF (2005) Characterization of CEBPA mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: most patients with CEBPA mutations have biallelic mutations and show a distinct immunophenotype of the leukemic cells. Clin Cancer Res 11:1372–1379
Preudhomme C, Sagot C, Boissel N, Cayuela JM, Tigaud I, de Botton S, Thomas X, Raffoux E, Lamandin C, Castaigne S, Fenaux P, Dombret H (2002) Favorable prognostic significance of CEBPA mutations in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a study from the Acute Leukemia French Association (ALFA). Blood 100:2717–2723
Vardiman JW, Thiele J, Arber DA, Brunning RD, Borowitz MJ, Porwit A, Harris NL, Le Beau MM, Hellström-Lindberg E, Tefferi A, Bloomfield CD (2009) The 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia: rationale and important changes. Blood 114:937–951
Benett JM, Catovsky D, Daniel MT, Flandrin G, Galton DAG, Gralnick HR, Sultan C (1976) Proposed revised criteria for the classification of acute myeloid leukemia. A report of the French–American–British Cooperative group. Br J Haematol 33:451–458
Grimwade D, Hills RK, Moorman AV, Walker H, Chatters S, Goldstone AH, Wheatley K, Harrison CJ, Burnett AK, National Cancer Research Institute Adult Leukaemia Working Group (2010) Refinement of cytogenetic classification in acute myeloid leukemia: determination of prognostic significance of rare recurring chromosomal abnormalities among 5876 younger adult patients treated in the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials. Blood 116:354–365
Schnittger S, Schoch C, Kern W, Mecucci C, Tschulik C, Martelli MF, Haferlach T, Hiddemann W, Falini B (2005) Nucleophosmin gene mutations are predictors of favorable prognosis in acute myelogenous leukemia with a normal karyotype. Blood 106:3733–3739
Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimations from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481
Mantel N (1966) Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:163–170
Cox DR (1972) Regression models and life tables (with discussion). JR Stat Soc B 34:187–220
Leroy H, Roumier C, Huyghe P, Biggio V, Fenaux P, Preudhomme C (2005) CEBPA point mutations in hematological malignancies. Leukemia 19:329–334
Leecharendkeat A, Tocharoentanaphol C, Auewarakul CU (2008) CCAAT/enhancer binding protein-alpha polymorphisms occur more frequently than mutations in acute myeloid leukemia and exist across all cytogenetic risk groups and leukemia subtypes. Int J Cancer 123:2321–2326
Schlenk RF, Döhner K, Krauter J, Fröhling S, Corbacioglu A, Bullinger L, Habdank M, Späth D, Morgan M, Benner A, Schlegelberger B, Heil G, Ganser A, Döhner H (2008) Mutations and treatment outcome in cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 358:1909–1918
Acknowledgments
This study was partially supported by the grants “Fondo de Investigación Sanitaria, Instituto de Salud Carlos III” 06/0657, “Red Temática de Investigación Cooperativa en Cancer” RD06/0020/0031, “Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación” BES2008-0080539, “Contrato de técnicos de apoyo a la investigación en el Sistema Nacional de Salud” CA08/00141, and “X Contratos de investigación para postresidentes-Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria, Fundación de Investigación Hospital La Fe-”. We also are grateful to Biobanco La Fe for supplying biological samples (RD09/0076/00021).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fuster, O., Barragán, E., Bolufer, P. et al. Fragment length analysis screening for detection of CEBPA mutations in intermediate-risk karyotype acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Hematol 91, 1–7 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-011-1234-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-011-1234-z