Skip to main content
Log in

Classification of the subtalar articular surface and its matching situation: an anatomical study on Chinese subtalar joint

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The subtalar joint (STJ) is complex in anatomy and function. The purpose of this study is to classify the articular surface of the calcaneus in a sample Chinese population and discuss the relationship between its matching situation and the stability of STJ.

Methods

328 patients with 445 STJs were measured and classified using CT three-dimensional reconstruction. The calcaneal facets were classified according to the morphological characteristics. According to the number, shape, and fusion of the calcaneus and talus facets, the matching situation was determined. The parameters of measurement: the Gissane’s angle, the Böhler’s angle, the long-axis sum and the short-axis sum, and the average total joint facet area.

Results

The calcaneal surfaces in a sample Chinese population were classified into five types: Type I (219, 49.2%), Type II (102, 22.9%), Type III (68, 15.3%), Type IV (47, 10.6%) and Type V (9, 2%). The total matching rate of STJ is 98%. In terms of Gissane’s angle, there was a significant difference between Type II and Type IV (P < 0.05). The long-axis sum of Type III (4.53 ± 0.58 cm) was significantly smaller than other types (P < 0.05). Type II (3.64 ± 0.47 cm) was statistically larger than other types in the short-axis sum (P < 0.05). The average total joint facet area of Type III (7.05 ± 1.40 cm2) was significantly smaller than other types (P < 0.05). Type V (9.31 ± 3.96 cm2) was statistical differences with Type II, Type III and Type IV (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between left and right sides of the articular facets in this study (P > 0.05).

Conclusions

According to Bunnins’s classification, the type with separated facets predominated but the matching situation between STJ was not elaborated, which was closely linked to the stability of STJ and surgical strategy of calcaneus fracture. The calcaneus articular surfaces in a sample Chinese population were divided into five types. Type I was the most common type and Type V was the rarest. Type II have the highest stability, Type V may be the lowest stability and Type III was more prone to osteoarthritis. The STJ articular surfaces were basically matched, contributing to the coordinate movement of the STJ. The matching articular surfaces of STJ were more stable than the mismatching surfaces. To some extent that STJ facet number, shape, facet area, and matching situation are factors in STJ stability, and the anatomical variations of the STJ offer predictive value in determining the predisposition to STI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal S, Garg S, Vasudeva N (2016) Subtalar joint instability and calcaneal spurs associated with the configuration of the articular facets of adult human calcaneum in Indian population. J Clin Diagn Res 10:ac05–ac09. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2016/20216.8444

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Aynardi M, Pedowitz DI, Raikin SM (2015) Subtalar instability. Foot Ankle Clin 20:243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2015.02.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barbaix E, Van Roy P, Clarys JP (2000) Variations of anatomical elements contributing to subtalar joint stability: intrinsic risk factors for post-traumatic lateral instability of the ankle? Ergonomics 43:1718–1725. https://doi.org/10.1080/001401300750004122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruckner J (1987) Variations in the human subtalar joint. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 8:489–494. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.1987.8.10.489

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bunning PS, Barnett CH (1965) A comparison of adult and foetal talocalcaneal articulations. J Anat 99:71–76

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Cho HJ, Kwak DS, Kim IB (2014) Analysis of movement axes of the ankle and subtalar joints: relationship with the articular surfaces of the talus. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H J Eng Med 228:1053–1058. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411914554820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Essex-Lopresti P (1952) The mechanism, reduction technique, and results in fractures of the os calcis. Br J Surg 39:395–419. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.18003915704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta SC, Gupta CD, Arora AK (1977) Pattern of talar articular facets in Indian calcanei. J Anat 124:651–655

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung MH, Choi BY, Lee JY, Han CS, Lee JS, Yang YC, Cho BP (2015) Types of subtalar joint facets. Surg Radiol Anat 37:629–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-015-1472-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kothari A, Bhuva S, Stebbins J, Zavatsky AB, Theologis T (2016) An investigation into the aetiology of flexible flat feet: the role of subtalar joint morphology. Bone Jt J 98-b:564–568. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.98b4.36059

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Krahenbuhl N, Horn-Lang T, Hintermann B, Knupp M (2017) The subtalar joint: a complex mechanism. EFORT Open Rev 2:309–316. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.2.160050

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Maceira E, Monteagudo M (2015) Subtalar anatomy and mechanics. Foot Ankle Clin 20:195–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2015.02.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Madhavi C, Madhuri V, George VM, Antonisamy B (2008) South Indian calcaneal talar facet configurations and osteoarthritic changes. Clin Anat 21:581–586. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mittlmeier T, Rammelt S (2018) Update on subtalar joint instability. Foot Ankle Clin 23:397–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2018.04.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Nozaki S, Watanabe K, Katayose M (2017) Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of the talus: implication for variations in kinematics of the subtalar joint. Surg Radiol Anat 39:1097–1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-017-1851-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Prasad SA, Rajasekhar S (2019) Morphometric analysis of talus and calcaneus. Surg Radiol Anat 41:9–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-018-2101-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Qiang M, Chen Y, Zhang K, Li H, Dai H (2014) Measurement of three-dimensional morphological characteristics of the calcaneus using CT image post-processing. J Foot Ankle Res 7:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-7-19

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Ragab AA, Stewart SL, Cooperman DR (2003) Implications of subtalar joint anatomic variation in calcaneal lengthening osteotomy. J Pediatr Orthop 23:79–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rubin G, Witten G (1962) The subtalar joint and the symptom of turning over on the ankle: a new method of evaluation utilizing tomography. Am J Orthop 4:16–19

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saadeh F, Fuad A, Mahmoud S, Marwan E (2000) Patterns of the talar articular facets of Egyptian calcanei. J Anat Soc India 49:6–8

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sangeorzan A, Sangeorzan B (2018) Subtalar joint biomechanics: from normal to pathologic. Foot Ankle Clin 23:341–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2018.04.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sengodan VC, Amruth KHK (2012) Bohler's and Gissane angles in the Indian population. J Clin Imaging Sci 2:77. https://doi.org/10.4103/2156-7514.104310

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Seyahi A, Uludag S, Koyuncu LO, Atalar AC, Demirhan M (2009) The calcaneal angles in the Turkish population. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 43:406–411. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.2009.406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shahabpour M, Deville A, Van Roy P, Vaes P, De Mey J, De Maeseneer M (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging of anatomical variants of the subtalar joint. Surg Radiol Anat 33:623–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0788-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Academician Workstation in Luzhou (20180101) and Luzhou Municipal Government—Southwest Medical University Shizhen Zhong Academician Talent Team Subproject (2018zszysrctdxm).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LZ and Badalahu: conception and design, BQ: manuscript writing/editing, YZ: protocol/project development, JQ-L: data analysis, SJ-F: data collection. SJ-F: provision of materials and literature search.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lei Zhang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There was no conflict of interest with the submission of this manuscript, and the manuscript was approved by all authors for publication.

Ethical approval

Ethical approval was given by the medical ethics committee of Southwest Medical University with the following reference number: KY2018012.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Badalahu, Qin, B., Luo, J. et al. Classification of the subtalar articular surface and its matching situation: an anatomical study on Chinese subtalar joint. Surg Radiol Anat 42, 1133–1139 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02444-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-020-02444-4

Keywords

Navigation