Abstract
Purpose
Infraorbital nerve block is used for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in nasal and oral surgery procedures, as well as in the chronic pain settings. Ultrasound guidance has not been described in the literature. The aim of the study was to assess the quality of ultrasound imaging of the infraorbital foramen and develop an “in-plane” technique of the block using a skull model.
Methods
The infraorbital foramina were assessed on five skull models immersed in the water bath. Ultrasound-guided simulation of an in-plane infraorbital nerve block was then performed. Slightly curved needle was placed close to the foramina and its visibility was recorded. Success rate and time to locate infraorbital foramina, success rate and time to insert the needle close to the foramina under ultrasound and correlation between the ultrasound and caliper measurements were evaluated and recorded. Data for the left and right foramen were compared.
Results
The infraorbital foramina were successfully located using ultrasound in all 20 cases. Simulation of infraorbital nerve block was also successful in all measurements. The time difference between locating or simulating blockade of the left and right infraorbital foramina was not statistically significant. Correlation between ultrasound measurement and direct measurement using a caliper was satisfactory for the distances between the inferior orbital rim and the inferior margin of the infraorbital foramen but poor for the distances between the lower rim of the orbit and the superior margin of the foramen.
Conclusions
This experimental study suggests that the infraorbital foramen is easily located using ultrasound and an “in-plane” ultrasound-guided technique for infraorbital nerve blockade is feasible on the model.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agtbong S, Huanmanop T, Chentanez V (2005) Anatomical variations of the supraorbital, infraorbital, and mental foramina related to gender and side. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:800–804
Berberich G, Reader A, Drum M, Nusstein J, Beck M (2009) A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of anesthetic efficacy of two percent lidocaine with 1:100,000 and 1:50,000 epinephrine and three percent mepivacaine in the intraoral, infraorbital nerve block. J Endod 35:1498–1504
Chan BJ, Koushan K, Liszauer A, Martin J (2011) Iatrogenic globe penetration in a case of infraorbital nerve block. Can J Ophtalmol 46:290–291
Clendenen SR, Riutort KT, Finglass NG, Greengrass RA, Brull SJ (2009) Real-time three-dimensional ultrasound for continuous brachial plexus blockade. J Anesth 23:466–468
Deleuze A, Gentili ME, Bonnet F (2009) Regional anaesthesia for head and neck surgery. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 28:818–823
Friedrich RE, Heiland M, Bartel-Friedrich S (2003) Potential of ultrasound in the diagnosis of midfacial fractures. Clin Oral Investig 7:226–229
Gaonkar V, Daftary SR (2004) Comparison of preoperative infraorbital block with peri-incisional infiltration for postoperative pain relief in cleft lip surgeries. Indian J Plastic Surg 37:105–109
Higashizawa T, Koga Y (2001) Effect of infraorbital nerve block under general anaesthesia on consumption of isoflurane and postoperative pain in endoscopic nasal maxillary sinus surgery. J Anesth 15:136–138
Hu KS, Kwak J, Koh KS, Abe S, Fontaine C, Kim HJ (2007) Topographic area of infraorbital nerve. Surg Radiol Anat 29:383–388
Karkut B, Reader A, Drum M, Nusstein J, Beck M (2010) A comparison of the local anesthetic efficacy of the extraoral versus the intraoral infraorbital nerve block. J Am Dent Assoc 141:185–192
Kazkayasi M, Ergin A, Ersoy M, Tekdemir I, Elhan A (2003) Microscopic anatomy of the infraorbital canal, nerve, and foramen. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 129:692–697
Lee UY, Nam SH, Han SH, Choi KN, Kim TJ (2006) Morphological characteristics of the infraorbital foramen and infraorbital canal using three dimensional models. Surg Radiol Anat 28:115–120
Lynch MT, Syverud SA, Schwab RA, Jenkins JM, Edlich R (1994) Comparison of intraoral and percutaneous approaches for infraorbital nerve block. Acad Emerg Med 1:514–519
Mariano ER, Watson D, Loland VJ, Chu LF, Cheng GS, Mehta SH, Maldonaldo RC, Ilfeld BM (2009) Bilateral infraorbital nerve block decrease postoperative pain but do not reduce time to discharge following outpatient nasal surgery. Can J Anaesth 56:584–589
Masuda A, Ito Y (1997) Maxillary bone defect by infraorbital nerve block. J Anesth 11:75–76
Mauldin FW Jr, Owen K, Tiouririne M, Hossack JA (2012) The effects of transducer geometry on artifacts common to diagnostic bone imaging with conventional medical ultrasound. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 59:1101–1114
Molliex S, Navez M, Baylot D, Prades JM, Elkoury Z, Auboyer C (1995) Regional anaesthesia for outpatient nasal surgery. Br J Anaesth 76:151–153
Park JT, Kim YW, Jeong EK, Lee YB (2009) Retrobulbar hematoma after infraorbital nerve block in trigeminal neuralgia. Korean J Pain 22:241–244
Saeedi OJ, Wang H, Blomquist PH (2011) Penetrating globe injury during infraorbital nerve block. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 137:396–397
Sites BD, Brull R, Chan VW, Spence BC, Gallagher J, Beach ML, Sites VR, Abbas S, Hartman GS (2007) Artifacts and pitfalls errors associated with ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia. Part II: a pictorial approach to understanding and avoidance. Reg Anesth Pain Med 32:419–433
Tsui BC (2009) Ultrasound imaging to localize foramina for superficial trigeminal nerve block. Can J Anaesth 56:704–706
Turk F, Kurt AB, Saglam S (2010) Evaluation by ultrasound of traumatic rib fractures missed by radiography. Emerg Radiol 17:473–477
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Prof. Milan Adamus for his help with statistical analysis.
Conflict of interest
None declared.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Michalek, P., Donaldson, W., McAleavey, F. et al. Ultrasound imaging of the infraorbital foramen and simulation of the ultrasound-guided infraorbital nerve block using a skull model. Surg Radiol Anat 35, 319–322 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-012-1039-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-012-1039-3