Skip to main content
Log in

Computerized preoperative planning for correction of sagittal deformity of the spine

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Various methods of preoperative planning have been described for the correction of spinal sagittal deformities. They are reliable on condition that the thoracolumbar spine is totally fused and enable only the simulation of pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO). In this study, a new theoretical planning that can be used regardless of the etiology of the deformity and the type of osteotomy is described and assessed.

Methods

The spino-pelvic sagittal balance can be expressed by two parameters: pelvic tilt (PT) and center of both acoustic meati (CAM) overhang. These two parameters vary according to the type, number, level, and angulation of osteotomies. The general principle of the planning is to define the surgical program in order to obtain PT and CAM overhang as close as possible to the normal values. The theoretical planning is based on a trigonometric construction which depends on numerous factors and is challenging to use in daily practice without the aid of a software tool. Modifications are proposed if the spine cannot be modeled as a solid beam due to unfused disks allowing relative motion. The SpineView software, which enables analysis and quick visualization of different correction possibilities, is presented. The planning method is assessed in a prospective cohort of 11 patients by comparing planned values of spino-pelvic parameters to postoperative values.

Results

In all, 8 preoperative plans out of 11 were concordant with the postoperative results.

Conclusions

The preoperative planning enables the surgeon to estimate the clinical effects of the different surgical techniques in order to choose the best procedure for a given patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J et al (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15:415–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bridwell KH (2006) Decision making regarding Smith-Petersen vs pedicle subtraction osteotomy vs vertebral column resection for spinal deformity. Spine 31:S171–S178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Champain S, Benchikh K, Nogier A et al (2006) Validation of new clinical quantitative analysis software applicable in spine orthopaedic studies. Eur Spine J 15:982–991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Delmas A (1951) Types rachidiens de statique corporelle. Rev Morpho-physiol Hum 4:27–32

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duval Beaupère G, Legaye J (2004) Composante sagittale de la statique rachidienne. Rev Rhum 71:105–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gangnet N, Pomero V, Dumas R et al (2003) Variability of the spine and pelvis location with respect to the gravity line: a three-dimensional radiographic study using a force platform. Surg Radiol Anat 25:424–433

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gelb DE, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (1995) An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment in 100 asymptomatic middle and older aged volunteers. Spine 20:1351–1358

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR et al (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 30:2024–2029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Horton WC, Brown CW, Bridwell KH et al (2005) Is there an optimal patient stance for obtaining a lateral 36″ radiograph? A critical comparison of three techniques. Spine 30:427–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jackson RP, Hales C (2000) Congruent spinopelvic alignment on standing lateral radiographs of adult volunteers. Spine 25:2808–2815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jang JS, Lee SH, Min JH et al (2009) Influence of lumbar lordosis restoration on thoracic curve and sagittal position in lumbar degenerative kyphosis patients. Spine 34:280–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lazennec JY, Ramare S, Arafati N et al (2000) Sagittal alignment in lumbosacral fusion: relations between radiological parameters and pain. Eur Spine J 9:47–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Legaye J, Duval Beaupère G, Hecquet J et al (1998) Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J 7:99–103

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mangione P, Senegas J (1997) L’équilibre rachidien dans le plan sagittal. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 83:22–32

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ondra SL, Marzouk S, Koski T et al (2006) Mathematical calculation of pedicle subtraction osteotomy size to allow precision correction of fixed sagittal deformity. Spine. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000247950.02886.e5

  16. Pigge RR, Scheerder FJ, Smit TH et al (2008) Effectiveness of preoperative planning in the restoration of balance and view in ankylosing spondylitis. Neurosurg Focus. doi:10.3171/foc/2008/24/1/E7

  17. Rajnics P, Pomero V, Templier A et al (2001) Computer-assisted assessment of spinal sagittal plane radiographs. J Spinal Disord 14:135–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ruf M, Wagner R, Merk H et al (2006) Preoperative planning and computer assisted surgery in ankylosing spondylitis (Abstract). Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 144:52–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Royen BJ, De Gast A, Smit TH (2000) Deformity planning for sagittal plane corrective osteotomies of the spine in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 9:492–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Royen BJ, Sheerder FJ, Jansen E et al (2007) ASKyphoplan: a program for deformity planning in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 16:1445–1449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Van Royen BJ, Toussaint HM, Kingma I et al (1998) Accuracy of the sagittal vertical axis in a standing lateral radiograph as a measurement of balance in spinal deformities. Eur Spine J 7:408–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vaz G, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E et al (2002) Sagittal morphology and equilibrium of pelvis and spine. Eur Spine J 11:80–87

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Vialle R, Levassor N, Rillardon L et al (2005) Radiographic analysis of the sagittal alignment and balance of the spine in asymptomatic subjects. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:260–267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vital JM, Senegas J (2006) Anatomical bases of the study of the constraints to which the cervical spine is subject in the sagittal plane. A study of the center of gravity of the head. Surg Radiol Anat 8:169–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang BP, Ondra SL (2006) A method for calculating the exact angle required during pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal deformity: comparison with the trigonometric method. Neurosurgery. doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000232628.46247.15

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Aurouer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aurouer, N., Obeid, I., Gille, O. et al. Computerized preoperative planning for correction of sagittal deformity of the spine. Surg Radiol Anat 31, 781–792 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0524-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0524-9

Keywords

Navigation