Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of the effect of visceral fat area on the distance and angle between the superior mesenteric artery and the aorta

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the effect of visceral fat area on the distance and angle between the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and the aorta.

Methods

On axial and sagittal images from abdomen CT scan, the distance and the angle between the SMA and the aorta were measured at the location where the third part of the duodenum crosses. The visceral fat area was calculated at the level of the umbilicus on the abdominal CT section. Body mass index was calculated.

Results

For both genders, the correlation between the distance and visceral fat area was substantial (p < 0.001). For males, there was no statistically significant relationship between the angle and the visceral fat area. For females, the correlation between the angle and the visceral fat area was low but significant and positive (r = 0.25, p < 0.048). In addition, it was found that males have a greater proportion of visceral fat than females. In both females and males, the subcutaneous fat area correlated with BMI (r = 0.65, r = 0.69, respectively, p < 0.001), more strongly than the visceral fat area did (r = 0.51, r = 0.63, respectively, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The distance between the aorta and the SMA significantly correlates with visceral fat area than with BMI. The size of visceral fat area of females and males vary; therefore, the amount of visceral fat area should be considered in the establishing diagnosis of SMA syndrome.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams TD, Heath EM, LaMonte MJ et al (2007) The relationship between body mass index and per cent body fat in the severely obese. Diabet Obes Metab 9:498–505

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal GA, Johnson PT, Fishman EK (2007) Multidetector row CT of superior mesenteric artery syndrome. J Clin Gastroenterol 41:62–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson JR, Earnshaw PM, Fraser GM (1982) Extrinsic compression of the third part of the duodenum. Clin Radiol 33:75–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Asayama K, Dobashi K, Hayashibe H et al (2002) Threshold values of visceral fat measures and their anthropometric alternatives for metabolic derangement in Japanese obese boys. Int J Obes 26:208–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bedogni G, Pietrobelli A, Heymsfield S et al (2001) Is body mass index a measure of adiposity in elderly women? Obes Res 9:17–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hirooka M, Kumagi T, Kurose K et al (2005) A technique for the measurement of visceral fat by ultrasonography: comparison of measurements by ultrasonography and computed tomography. Intern Med 44:794–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kobayashi J, Tadokoro N, Watanabe M et al (2002) A novel method of measuring intra-abdominal fat volume using helical computed tomography. Int J Obes 26:398–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Konen E, Amitai M, Apter S et al (1998) CT angiography of superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Am J Roentgenol 171:1279–1281

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ozkurt H, Cenker MM, Bas N et al (2007) Measurement of the distance and angle between the aorta and superior mesenteric artery: normal values in different BMI categories. Surg Radiol Anat 29:595–599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rokitansky C (1861) Lehrbuch der Pathologischen Anatomie. Braumuller & Siedel, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rosa-Jimenez F, Rodriguez Gonzalez FJ, Puente Gutierrez JJ et al (2003) Duodenal compression caused by superior mesenteric artery: study of 10 patients. Rev Esp Enferm Dig 9:485–489

    Google Scholar 

  12. Roy A, Gisel JJ, Roy V et al (2005) Superior mesenteric artery (Wilkie’s) syndrome as a result of cardiac cachexia. J Gen Intern Med 20:c3–c4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Siedell JC, Oosterlee A, Thijssen M et al (1987) Assessment of intraabdominal and subcutaneous abdominal fat: relation between anthropometry and computed tomography. Am J Clin Nutr 45:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  14. Unal B, Aktas A, Kemal G et al (2005) Superior mesenteric artery syndrome: CT and ultrasonography findings. Diagn Interv Radiol 11:90–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Welsch T, Büchler MW, Kienle P (2007) Recalling superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Dig Surg 24:149–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshizumi T, Nakamura T, Yamane M et al (1999) Abdominal fat: standartized technique for measurement at CT. Radiology 211:283–286

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nilgun Isiksalan Ozbulbul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ozbulbul, N.I., Yurdakul, M., Dedeoglu, H. et al. Evaluation of the effect of visceral fat area on the distance and angle between the superior mesenteric artery and the aorta. Surg Radiol Anat 31, 545–549 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0482-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0482-2

Keywords

Navigation