Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CT evaluation of cervical pedicle in a Chinese population for surgical application of transpedicular screw placement

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The lower cervical pedicle size differs between the Chinese and the non-Chinese population. Knowledge of pedicle dimensions and surface landmarks is crucial for the safe placement of screws, but few quantitative data concerning the lower cervical pedicle using CT scan and multiplanar reformations (MPR) in a Chinese population exist. The aim of this study was to evaluate lower cervical pedicle (C3–C7) dimensions in a Chinese population by computed axial tomography for surgical application. The dimensions of the pedicles (C3–C7) were determined in 60 patients from CT images of cervical spinal lesions. Measurements of pedicle height, width, pedicle axis length, effective length, and two angles of the pedicles, the distances from the projection point of the pedicle axis to the lateral edge of the lateral mass and to the inferior edge of the superior facet were measured. The smallest outer pedicle width was found at C3 among the female and C4 among the male. This measurement was significantly different between male and female patients in the outer pedicle width (P < 0.05; independent samples t test) at C3 and C4. The mean values of the outer pedicle width ranged from 5.4 to 6.7 mm in males, and 4.4 to 6.3 mm in females. The projection point of the pedicle axis in the lateral-superior area of the cervical lateral mass was the most important. There were significant correlations (< 0.01; Kendall’s W test) between the vertebral level and both pedicle angles (PTA and PSA). The smallest pedicle transverse angle was at C7 in males and females. The cervical spinal cord or vertebral artery may be at risk of injury if the angulation of the screw insert is over-medial or over-lateral in the transverse plane. Therefore, preoperative CT evaluation of pedicle transverse angle is very important. Considering the amount of variation among individuals, our data on CT measurements of pedicle in a Chinese population in conjunction with evaluation of the results of preoperative CT may enhance the safety of transpedicular screw fixation in the lower cervical spine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abumi K, Itoh H, Taneichi H et al (1994) Transpedicular screw fixation for traumatic lesions of the middle and lower cervical spine: description of the techniques and preliminary report. J Spinal Disord 7:19–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Abumi K, Kaneda K, Shono Y et al (1999) One-stage posterior decompression and reconstruction of the cervical spine by using pedicle screw fixation systems. J Neurosurg (Spine) 90:19–26

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Abumi K, Shono Y, Ito M et al (2000) Complications of pedicle screw fixation in reconstructive surgery of the cervical spine. Spine 25:962–969

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anson JA, Spetzler RF (1995) Surgery for vertebrobasilar insufficiency. In: Carter LP, Spetzler RF, Hamilton MG (eds) Neurovascular surgery. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 383–403

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bailey AS, Stanescu S, Yeasting R et al (1995) Anatomic relationships of the cervicothoracic junction. Spine 20:1431–1439

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bozbuga M, Ozturk A, Ari Z et al (2004) Morphometric evaluation of subaxial cervical vertebrae for surgical application of transpedicular screw fixation. Spine 29:1876–1880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brink B(1984): Approach to the second segment of the vertebral arteries. In: Berguer R, Bauer RB (eds) Vertebrobasilar arterial occlusive disease: medical and surgical management. Raven, New York, pp 257–64

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bruneau M, Cornelius JF, Marneffe V et al (2006) Anatomical variations of the V2 segment of the vertebral artery. Neurosurgery 59(1 Suppl 1):ONS20–4

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chazono M, Soshi S, Inoue T et al (2006) Anatomical considerations for cervical pedicle screw insertion: the use of multiplanar computerized tomography reconstruction measurements. J Neurosurg Spine 4:472–477

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Coe JD, Warden KE, Sutterlin CE III et al (1989) Biomechanical evaluation of cervical stabilization methods in a human cadaveric model. Spine 14:1122–1131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Daniels DL, Hyde JS, Kneeland JB (1986) The cervical nerves and foramina: local-coil MRI imaging. Am J Neuradiol 7:129–133

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Knight T et al (1997) Morphometric evaluation of lower pedicle and its projection. Spine 22:1–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. George B, Cornelius J (2001) Vertebral artery: surgical anatomy, in operative techniques in neurosurgery. Saunders, New York, pp 168–181

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hou S, Hu R, Shi Y (1993) Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in a Chinese population. Spine 18:1850–1855

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jovanovic MS (1990) A comparative study of the transverse foramen of the sixth and seventh cervical vertebrae. Surg Radiol Anat 12:167–172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Karaikovic EE, Daubs MD, Madsen RW et al (1997) Morphologic characteristics of human cervical pedicles. Spine 22:493–500

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kayalioglu G, Erturk M, Varol T et al (2007) Morphometry of the cervical vertebral pedicles as a guide for transpedicular screw fixation. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica 47:102–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim HS, Heller JG, Hudgins PA et al (2003) The accuracy of computed tomography in assessing cervical pedicle screw placement. Spine 28:2441–2446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kothe R, Ruther W, Schneider E et al (2004) Biomechanical analysis of transpedicular screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine. Spine 29:1869–1875

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu YJ, Tian W, Liu B et al (2005) Accuracy of CT-based navigation of pedicle screws implantation in the cervical spine compared with X-ray fluoroscopy technique. Chin J Surg 43:1328–1330

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ludwig SC, Kowalski JM, Edwards CC et al (2000) Cervical pedicle screws: comparative accuracy of two insertion techniques. Spine 25:2675–2681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ludwig SC, Kramer DL, Balderston RA et al (2000) Placement of pedicle screws in the human cadaveric cervical spine: comparative accuracy of three techniques. Spine 25:1655–1667

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mao GP, Zhao JN, Wang YR et al (2005) Design of cervical pedicle locator and three-dimensional location of cervical pedicle. Spine 30:1045–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Owen BD, Christensen GE, Reinhardt JM et al (2007) Rapid prototype patient-specific drill template for cervical pedicle screw placement. Comput Aided Surg 12:303–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pal GP, Routal RW(1986) A study of weight transmission through the cervical and upper thoracic regions of the vertebral column in man. J Anat 148:245–261

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Panjabi MM, Duranceau J, Goel V et al (1991) Cervical human vertebrae: quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of the middle and lower regions. Spine 16:861–869

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Panjabi MM, Shin EK, Chen NC, Wang JL (2000) Internal morphology of human cervical pedicles. Spine 25:1197–1205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pech P, Daniels DL, Williams AL et al (1985) The cervical neural foramina: correlation of microtomy and CT anatomy. Radiology 155:143–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Rezcallah AT, Xu R, Ebraheim NA et al (2001) Axial computed tomography of the pedicle in the lower cervical spine. Am J Orthop 30:59–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Richter M, Amiot L-P, Neller S et al (2000) Computer assisted surgery in posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine—an in vitro feasibility study. Eur Spine J (suppl 1) 9:S65–S70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Richter M, Cakir B, Schmidt R et al (2005) Cervical pedicle screws: conventional versus computer-assisted placement of cannulated screws. Spine 30:2280–2287

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Sakamoto T, Neo M, Nakamura T (2004) Transpedicular screw placement evaluated by axial computed tomography of the cervical pedicle. Spine 29:2510–2514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Shin EK, PanjabiMM, chen NC et al (2000) The anatomic variability of human cervical pedicles: considerations for transpedicular screw fixation in the middle and lower cervical spine. Eur Spine J 9:61–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Shirado O, Zdeblick TA, McAfee PC et al (1991) Biomechanical evaluation of methods of posterior stabilization of the spine and posterior lumbar interbody arthrodesis for lumbosacral isthmic spondylolisthesis: a calf-spine model. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 73:518–526

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tan SH, Teo EC, Chua HC (2004) Quantitative three-dimensional anatomy of cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae of Chinese Singaporeans. Eur Spine J 13:137–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Tian W, Liu YJ, Liu B et al (2006) Clinical contrast of cervical pedicle screw fixation assisted by C-arm fluoroscopy or 3D navigation system. Chin J Surg 44:1399–1402

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ugur HC, Attar A, Uz A et al (2000) Surgical anatomic evaluation of the cervical pedicle and adjacent neural structures. Neurosurgery 47:1162–1169

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Vara, Christopher S, Thompson et al (2006) A cadaveric examination of pediatric cervical pedicle morphology. Spine 31:1107–1112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Xu R, Kang A, Ebraheim NA et al (1999) Anatomic relation between the cervical pedicle and the adjacent neural structures. Spine 24:451–454

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Xu R, Nadaud MC, Ebraheim NA et al (1995) Morphology of the second cervical vertebra and the posterior projection of the C2 pedicle axis. Spine 20:259–263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Yusof MI, Ming LK, Abdullah MS et al (2006) Computerized tomographic measurement of the cervical pedicles diameter in a Malaysian population and the feasibility for transpedicular fixation. Spine 31:221–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yang Huilin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ruofu, Z., Huilin, Y., Xiaoyun, H. et al. CT evaluation of cervical pedicle in a Chinese population for surgical application of transpedicular screw placement. Surg Radiol Anat 30, 389–396 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0339-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0339-0

Keywords

Navigation