Correction to: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02692-2

The following change has been made to the publication since the original version was printed.

An error was present in the ablation data, which has been corrected. The corrected ablation data are from 4 out of the 6 included UK centres (Leeds, Manchester, Glasgow and Edinburgh) as the other two centres do not offer ablation. We have now included the data set from Glasgow, which was the only centre out of the 6 that continued to run a standard ablation service during the COVID-19 study period, with an 18% reduction in ablation numbers (11 ablations in 2019 period vs. 9 ablations in 2020 COVID period). The overall change in ablation practice across all 6 centres was therefore a 68.6% reduction rather than the quoted 91.7% in Table 1.

This highlights significant regional variation in ablation practice during the COVID-19 period depending on local strategy, however this does not necessarily represent the overall picture of UK ablation practice as the majority of the UK centres have not been included in the study.

We thank Dr David Kay (Consultant Interventional Radiologist, Glasgow) for providing the Glasgow data.