Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Sciatic Block Provides Adequate Analgesia During Urgent Endovascular Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia with Resting Pain

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To demonstrate feasibility and safety of ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block for providing analgesia during urgent endovascular treatment of critical limb ischemia with resting pain.

Materials and Methods

Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic blocks were performed by an interventional radiologist in angiography suite immediately prior to commencement of urgent endovascular treatment of 30 critical limb ischemia patients. Subjective pain levels prior to and following sciatic block were assessed using the visual analog scale (VAS). Need for any supplemental anxiolytics or analgesics during treatment was recorded. Post-procedural evaluation of patient and operator satisfaction levels regarding the intervention was also documented.

Results

Ultrasound-guided sciatic block provided adequate analgesia in all patients; VAS scores were 0 (no pain) in 87% and 1–3 (mild to annoying pain) in 13%. Two patients required anxiolytic premedication. Additional analgesia was not required during course of endovascular treatment of any patients. Time necessary to perform sciatic block ranged 3–9 (mean 5.9 ± 1.3) min. Median number of needle attempts was 1 (range 1–3). Onset of satisfactory block ranged from 5 to 20 min (mean 9.4 ± 2.6 min). Mean treatment time was 102.2 ± 36.7 min, and balloon time was 22.4 ± 6.1 min. Patient and operator satisfaction with pain control were very good in all cases. There were no procedure-related complications.

Conclusions

Ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic block is a feasible and safe alternative for providing adequate analgesia during urgent endovascular treatment of critical limb ischemia with resting pain.

Level of Evidence

Level 4, case series.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marcus AJ, Lotzof K, Kamath BS, et al. A new approach: regional nerve blockade for angioplasty of the lower limb. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006;29:235–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu SS, Strodtbeck WM, Richman JM, Wu CL. A comparison of regional versus general anesthesia for ambulatory anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:1634–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kent ML, Hackworth RJ, Riffenburgh RH, et al. A comparison of ultrasound-guided and landmark-based approaches to saphenous nerve blockade: a prospective, controlled, blinded, crossover trial. Anesth Analg. 2013;117:265–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. McCartney CJ, Lin L, Shastri U. Evidence basis for the use of ultrasound for upper-extremity blocks. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010;35:S10–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neal JM, Mulroy MF, Weinberg GL. American society of regional anesthesia and pain medicine checklist for managing local anesthetic systemic toxicity: 2012 version. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37:16–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moran TC, Kaye AD, Mai AH, Bok LR. Sedation, analgesia, and local anesthesia: a review for general and interventional radiologists. Radiographics. 2013;33:E47–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Neal JM. Ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia and patient safety: update of an evidence-based analysis. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:195–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sermeus L, Pirson A, Breebaart B, et al. Clinical guidelines for the practice of peripheral nerve blocks in the adult. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2013;64:105–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lehman MA, Lind LJ. Sedation, analgesia, and anesthesia. In: Kandarpa K, Machan L, Durham J, editors. Handbook of interventional radiologic procedures. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2016. p. 590–600.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Perlas A, Brull R, Chan VW, McCartney CJ, Nuica A, Abbas S. Ultrasound guidance improves the success of sciatic nerve block at the popliteal fossa. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33:259–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mariano ER, Loland VJ, Sandhu NS, et al. Comparative efficacy of ultrasound-guided and stimulating popliteal-sciatic perineural catheters for postoperative analgesia. Can J Anaesth. 2010;57:919–26.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dufour E, Quennesson P, Van Robais AL, et al. Combined ultrasound and neurostimulation guidance for popliteal sciatic nerve block: a prospective, randomized comparison with neurostimulation alone. Anesth Analg. 2008;106:1553–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Danelli G, Fanelli A, Ghisi D, et al. Ultrasound vs nerve stimulation multiple injection technique for posterior popliteal sciatic nerve block. Anaesthesia. 2009;64:638–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bendtsen TF, Nielsen TD, Rohde CV, Kibak K, Linde F. Ultrasound guidance improves a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block when compared with nerve stimulation. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2011;36:181–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bang SU, Kim DJ, Bae JH, Chung K, Kim Y. Minimum effective local anesthetic volume for surgical anesthesia by subparaneural, ultrasound-guided popliteal sciatic nerve block: a prospective dose-finding study. Medicine. 2016;95:e4652.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Latzke D, Marhofer P, Zeitlinger M, et al. Minimal local anaesthetic volumes for sciatic nerve block: evaluation of ED 99 in volunteers. Br J Anaesth. 2010;104:239–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Keplinger M, Marhofer P, Marhofer D, et al. Effective local anaesthetic volumes for sciatic nerve blockade: a clinical evaluation of the ED99. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:585–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jamieson S. Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Med Educ. 2004;38:1217–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Derya Tureli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Animal and Human Rights Statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tureli, D., Deniz, S., Unlukaplan, A. et al. Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Sciatic Block Provides Adequate Analgesia During Urgent Endovascular Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia with Resting Pain. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 41, 43–48 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1802-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-017-1802-2

Keywords

Navigation