Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Single-Centre Experience with Percutaneous Cryoablation of Breast Cancer in 23 Consecutive Non-surgical Patients

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim

To present our single-centre prospective experience on the use of cryoablation (CA) applied to treat primary breast cancer (BC) in a cohort of patients unsuitable for surgical treatment.

Materials and Methods

Twenty-three consecutive post-menopausal female patients (median age 85 years; range 56–96) underwent percutaneous CA of unifocal, biopsy-proven BC, under ultrasound/computed tomography (US/CT) guidance. Clinical and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) follow-ups were systematically scheduled at 3, 12, 18 and 24 months. Local tumour control was assessed by comparing baseline and follow-up DCE-MRI.

Results

Twenty-three BC (median size 14 mm) were treated under local anaesthesia (78.3 %) or local anaesthesia and conscious sedation (21.7 %). Median number of cryo-probes applied per session was 2.0. A “dual-freezing” protocol was applied for the first ten patients and a more aggressive “triple-freezing” protocol for the remaining 13. Median follow-up was 14.6 months. Five patients recurred during follow-up and two were successfully re-treated with CA. Five patients presented immediate CA-related complications: four hematomas evolved uneventfully at 3-month follow-up and one skin burn resulted in skin inflammation and skin retraction at 3 and 12 months, respectively.

Conclusions

Percutaneous CA is safe and well tolerated for non-resected elderly BC patients. Procedures can be proposed under local anaesthesia only. Given the insulation properties of the breast gland, aggressive CA protocols are required. Prospective studies are needed to better understand the potential role of CA in the local treatment of early BC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weir HK, Thompson TD, Soman A, Møller B, Leadbetter S. The past, present, and future of cancer incidence in the United States: 1975 through 2020. Cancer. 2015;121(11):1827–37. doi:10.1002/cncr.29258.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization. WHO Position Paper on Mammography Screening. WHO Guidel Approve by Guidel Rev Committee 2014.

  3. Lichter AS, Lippman ME, Danforth DN Jr, d’Angelo T, Steinberg SM, deMoss E, MacDonald HD, Reichert CM, Merino M, Swain SM, et al. Mastectomy versus breast-conserving therapy in the treatment of stage I and II carcinoma of the breast: a randomized trial at the National Cancer Institute. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10(6):976–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sarrazin D, Lê MG, Arriagada R, Contesso G, Fontaine F, Spielmann M, Rochard F, Le Chevalier T, Lacour J. Ten year results of a randomized trial comparing a conservative treatment to mastectomy in early breast cancer. Radiother Oncol. 1989;14(3):177–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Veronesi U, Banfi A, Salvadori B, Luini A, Saccozzi R, Zucali R, Marubini E, Del Vecchio M, Boracchi P, Marchini S, et al. Breast conservation is the treatment of choice in small breast cancer: long-term results of a randomized trial. Eur J Cancer. 1990;26(6):668–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lazovich DA, White E, Thomas DB, Moe RE. Underutilization of breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy among women with stage I or II breast cancer. JAMA. 1991;266(24):3433–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vlastos G, Mirza NQ, Meric F, Hunt KK, Kuerer HM, Ames FC, Ross MI, Buchholz TA, Hortobagyi GN, Singletary SE. Breast conservation therapy as a treatment option for the elderly: the M. D. Anderson experience. Cancer. 2001;92(5):1092–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Manenti G, Bolacchi F, Perretta T, Cossu E, Pistolese CA, Buonomo OC, Bonanno E, Orlandi A, Simonetti G. Small breast cancers: in vivo percutaneous US-guided radiofrequency ablation with dedicated cool-tip radiofrequency system. Radiology. 2009;251(2):339–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Palussière J, Henriques C, Mauriac L, Asad-Syed M, Valentin F, Brouste V, Mathoulin-Pélissier S, de Tunon Lara C, Debled M. Radiofrequency ablation as a substitute for surgery in elderly patients with nonresected breast cancer: pilot study with long-term outcomes. Radiology. 2012;264(2):597–605.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nguyen T, Hattery E, Khatri VP. Radiofrequency ablation and breast cancer: a review. Gland Surg. 2014;3(2):128–35.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Manenti G, Perretta T, Gaspari E, Pistolese CA, Scarano L, Cossu E, Bonanno E, Buonomo OC, Petrella G, Simonetti G, Masala S. Percutaneous local ablation of unifocal subclinical breast cancer: clinical experience and preliminary results of cryotherapy. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(11):2344–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pusceddu C, Sotgia B, Amucano G, Fele RM, Pilleri S, Meloni GB, Melis L. Breast cryoablation in patients with bone metastatic breast cancer. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014;25(8):1225–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Littrup PJ, Jallad B, Chandiwala-Mody P, D’Agostini M, Adam BA, Bouwman D. Cryotherapy for breast cancer: a feasibility study without excision. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(10):1329–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001;220(1):13–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hinshaw JL, Littrup PJ, Durick N, Leung W, Lee FT Jr, Sampson L, Brace CL. Optimizing the protocol for pulmonary cryoablation: a comparison of a dual- and triple-freeze protocol. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33(6):1180–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Littrup PJ, Jallad B, Vorugu V, Littrup G, Currier B, George M, Herring D. Lethal isotherms of cryoablation in a phantom study: effects of heat load, probe size and number. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(10):1343–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Sabel MS, Kaufman CS, Whitworth P, Chang H, Stocks LH, Simmons R, Schultz M. Cryoablation of early-stage breast cancer: work-in-progress report of a multi-institutional trial. Ann Surg Oncol. 2004;11(5):542–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pfleiderer SO, Freesmeyer MG, Marx C, Kühne-Heid R, Schneider A, Kaiser WA. Cryotherapy of breast cancer under ultrasound guidance: initial results and limitations. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(12):3009–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gage AA, Baust JM, Baust JG. Experimental cryosurgery investigations in vivo. Cryobiology. 2009;59(3):229–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Manenti G, Scarano AL, Pistolese CA, Perretta T, Bonanno E, Orlandi A, Simonetti G. Subclinical breast cancer: minimally invasive approaches. Our experience with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation vs. cryotherapy. Breast Care. 2013;8(5):356–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Roberto Luigi Cazzato would like to thank CIRSE Foundation for supporting him with an educational grant which was spent to attend a fellowship at the Department of Radiology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France. Without the support of such grant, the present paper would have not be possible. The authors would like to thank Ravi Nookala for medical editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberto Luigi Cazzato.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors Roberto Luigi Cazzato, Christine Tunon de Lara, Xavier Buy, Stéphane Ferron, Gabrielle Hurtevent, Marion Fournier, Marc Debled and Jean Palussière have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cazzato, R.L., de Lara, C.T., Buy, X. et al. Single-Centre Experience with Percutaneous Cryoablation of Breast Cancer in 23 Consecutive Non-surgical Patients. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38, 1237–1243 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1181-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-015-1181-5

Keywords

Navigation