Skip to main content
Log in

Outcomes of Infrainguinal Revascularizations with Endovascular First Strategy in Critical Limb Ischemia

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study was designed to study the outcome of infrainguinal revascularization in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) in an institution with a preference towards endovascular intervention first in patients with poor condition, unfavourable anatomy for surgery, no venous material for bypass, and old age.

Methods

A prospective, observational cohort study was conducted between May 2007 and May 2010 in patients presenting with CLI. At baseline, the optimal treatment was selected, i.e., endovascular or surgical treatment. In case of uncertainty about the preferred treatment, a multidisciplinary team (MDT) was consulted. Primary endpoints were quality of life and functional status 6 and 12 months after initial intervention, assessed by the VascuQol and AMC Linear Disability Score questionnaires, respectively.

Results

In total, 113 patients were included; 86 had an endovascular intervention and 27 had surgery. During follow-up, 41 % underwent an additional ipsilateral revascularisation procedure. For the total population, and endovascular and surgery subgroups, the VascuQol sum scores improved after 6 and 12 months (p < 0.01 for all outcomes) compared with baseline. The functional status improved (p = 0.043) after 12 months compared with baseline for the total population. Functional status of the surgery subgroup improved significantly after 6 (p = 0.031) and 12 (p = 0.044) months, but not that of the endovascular subgroup.

Conclusions

Overall, the strategy of performing endovascular treatment first in patients with poor condition, unfavourable anatomy for surgery, no venous material for bypass, and old age has comparable or even slightly better results compared with the BASIL trial and other cohort studies. All vascular groups should discuss whether their treatment strategy should be directed at treating CLI patients preferably endovascular first and consider implementing an MDT to optimize patient outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG (2007) Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg 45(Suppl S):S5–S67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lawall H, Zemmrich C, Bramlage P, Amann B (2012) Health-related quality of life in patients with critical limb ischemia. Vasa 41(2):78–88

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Forbes JF, Adam DJ, Bell J, Fowkes FG, Gillespie I, Raab GM et al (2010) Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: health-related quality of life outcomes, resource utilization, and cost-effectiveness analysis. J Vasc Surg 51(5 Suppl):43S–51S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradbury AW, Adam DJ, Bell J, Forbes JF, Fowkes FG, Gillespie I et al (2010) Multicentre randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a bypass-surgery-first versus a balloon-angioplasty-first revascularisation strategy for severe limb ischaemia due to infrainguinal disease. The Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial. Health Technol Assess 14(14):1–210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Met R, Reekers JA, Koelemay MJ, Legemate DA, de Haan RJ (2009) The AMC linear disability score (ALDS): a cross-sectional study with a new generic instrument to measure disability applied to patients with peripheral arterial disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 7:88

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nordanstig J, Karlsson J, Pettersson M, Wann-Hansson C (2012) Psychometric properties of the disease-specific health-related quality of life instrument VascuQoL in a Swedish setting. Health Qual Life Outcomes. doi:10.1186/1477-7525-10-45

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morgan MB, Crayford T, Murrin B, Fraser SC (2001) Developing the Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire: a new disease-specific quality of life measure for use in lower limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 33(4):679–687

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Holman R, Lindeboom R, Glas CA, Vermeulen M, de Haan MW (2003) Constructing an item bank using item response theory: the AMC Linear Disability Score project. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 4:19–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Frans FA, Met R, Koelemay MJ, Bipat S, Dijkgraaf MG, Legemate DA et al (2013) Changes in functional status after treatment of critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 58(4):957–965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Adam DJ, Beard JD, Cleveland T, Bell J, Bradbury AW, Forbes JF et al (2005) Bypass versus angioplasty in severe ischaemia of the leg (BASIL): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 366(9501):1925–1934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Soderstrom M, Aho PS, Lepantalo M, Alback A (2009) The influence of the characteristics of ischemic tissue lesions on ulcer healing time after infrainguinal bypass for critical leg ischemia. J Vasc Surg 49(4):932–937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Simons JP, Schanzer A, Nolan BW, Stone DH, Kalish JA, Cronenwett JL et al (2012) Outcomes and practice patterns in patients undergoing lower extremity bypass. J Vasc Surg 55(6):1629–1636

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. May KK, Robless PA, Sidhu HR, Chua BS, Ho P (2014) Limb salvage in patients with peripheral arterial disease managed by endovascular first approach. Vasc Endovascular Surg 48(2):129–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wakassa TB, Benabou JE, Puech-Leão P (2014) Clinical efficacy of successful angioplasty in critical ischemia. Ann Vasc Surg 28(5):1143–1148

Download references

Acknowledgments

Seino A. K. Jongkees (JSPS Postdoctoral fellow at Tokyo University, Tokyo Japan) provided linguistic revision of the article. A. P. Conijn and F. A. Frans were funded by the Dutch Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw Grant 171102025 [a government granting agency]).

Conflict of interest

S. Jens, A. P. Conijn, F. A. Frans, M. B. B. Nieuwenhuis, R. Met, M. J. W. Koelemay, D. A. Legemate, S. Bipat, J. A. Reekers have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sjoerd Jens.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 57 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jens, S., Conijn, A.P., Frans, F.A. et al. Outcomes of Infrainguinal Revascularizations with Endovascular First Strategy in Critical Limb Ischemia. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38, 552–559 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-014-0955-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-014-0955-5

Keywords

Navigation