Abstract
Purpose
To quantify radiation exposure to the primary operator and staff during PET/CT-guided interventional procedures.
Methods
In this prospective study, 12 patients underwent PET/CT-guided interventions over a 6 month period. Radiation exposure was measured for the primary operator, the radiology technologist, and the nurse anesthetist by means of optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters. Radiation exposure was correlated with the procedure time and the use of in-room image guidance (CT fluoroscopy or ultrasound).
Results
The median effective dose was 0.02 (range 0–0.13) mSv for the primary operator, 0.01 (range 0–0.05) mSv for the nurse anesthetist, and 0.02 (range 0–0.05) mSv for the radiology technologist. The median extremity dose equivalent for the operator was 0.05 (range 0–0.62) mSv. Radiation exposure correlated with procedure duration and with the use of in-room image guidance. The median operator effective dose for the procedure was 0.015 mSv when conventional biopsy mode CT was used, compared to 0.06 mSv for in-room image guidance, although this did not achieve statistical significance as a result of the small sample size (p = 0.06).
Conclusion
The operator dose from PET/CT-guided procedures is not significantly different than typical doses from fluoroscopically guided procedures. The major determinant of radiation exposure to the operator from PET/CT-guided interventional procedures is time spent in close proximity to the patient.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ferrucci JT Jr, Wittenberg J (1978) CT biopsy of abdominal tumors: aids for lesion localization. Radiology 129:739–744
Rasmussen SN, Holm HH, Kristensen JK et al (1972) Ultrasonically-guided liver biopsy. Br Med J 2:500–502
Chambers TP, Baron RL, Lush RM et al (1994) Hepatic CT enhancement: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents in the same patients. Radiology 190:721–725
Burns PN, Wilson SR (2007) Focal liver masses: enhancement patterns on contrast-enhanced images—concordance of US scans with CT scans and MR images. Radiology 242:162–174
Sato M, Watanabe Y, Tokui K et al (2000) CT-guided treatment of ultrasonically invisible hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Gastroenterol 95:2102–2106
Schoellnast H, Larson SM, Nehmeh SA et al (2011) Radiofrequency ablation of non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung under real-time FDG PET CT guidance. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 34(suppl 2):S182–S185
Tatli S, Gerbaudo V, Feeley C et al (2011) PET/CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of abdominal masses: initial experience. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:507–514
Valentin J (1998) Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals (addendum 2 to ICRP publication 53). Ann ICRP 28:1–126
Huang B, Law MWM, Khong PL (2009) Whole-body PET/CT scanning: estimation of radiation dose and cancer risk. Radiology 251:166–174
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2011) Radiation Dose Management for Fluoroscopically Guided Interventional Medical Procedures. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda
Ahmed S, Zimmer A, McDonald N et al (2007) The effectiveness of lead aprons in reducing radiation exposures from specific radionuclides. J Nucl Med Meeting Abstr 48:470
Krücker J, Xu S, Venkatesan A et al (2011) Clinical utility of real-time fusion guidance for biopsy and ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22:515–524
Venkatesan AM, Kadoury S, Abi-Jaoudeh N et al (2011) Real-time FDG PET guidance during biopsies and radiofrequency ablation using multimodality fusion with electromagnetic navigation. Radiology 260:848–856
Khandani AH, Calvo BF, O’Neil BH et al (2007) A pilot study of early 18F-FDG PET to evaluate the effectiveness of radiofrequency ablation of liver metastases. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:1199–1202
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (2000) Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR (2000) Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes. United Nations, New York
Panuccio G, Greenberg RK, Wunderle K et al (2011) Comparison of indirect radiation dose estimates with directly measured radiation dose for patients and operators during complex endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg 53:885–894
Paulson EK, Sheafor DH, Enterline DS et al (2001) CT fluoroscopy—guided interventional procedures: techniques and radiation dose to radiologists. Radiology 220:161–167
Moran JK, Lee HB, Blaufox MD (1999) Optimization of urinary FDG excretion during PET imaging. J Nucl Med 40:1352–1357
Madsen MT, Anderson JA, Halama JR et al; AAPM Task Group 108 (2006) PET and PET/CT shielding requirements. Med Phys 33:4–15
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ryan, E.R., Thornton, R., Sofocleous, C.T. et al. PET/CT-guided Interventions: Personnel Radiation Dose. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 36, 1063–1067 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0515-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-012-0515-9