Skip to main content
Log in

Is the Routine Check Nephrostogram Following Percutaneous Antegrade Ureteric Stent Placement Necessary?

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our aim was to review our experience with percutaneous antegrade ureteric stent (PAUS) placement and to determine if the routinely conducted check nephrostogram on the day following ureteric stent placement was necessary. Retrospective review of patients who had undergone PAUS placement between January 2004 and December 2005 was performed. There were 83 subjects (36 males, 47 females), with a mean age of 59.9 years (range, 22–94 years). Average follow-up duration was 7.1 months (range, 1–24 months). The most common indications for PAUS placement were ureteric obstruction due to metastatic disease (n = 56) and urinary calculi (n = 34). Technical success was 93.2% (96/103 attempts), with no major immediate procedure-related complications or mortalities. The Bard 7Fr Urosoft DJ Stent was used in more than 95% of the cases. Eighty-one of 89 (91.0%) check nephrostograms demonstrated a patent ureteric stent with resultant safety catheter removal. Three check nephrostograms revealed distal stent migration requiring repositioning by a goose-snare, while five others showed stent occlusion necessitating permanent external drainage by nephrostomy drainage catheter reinsertion. Following PAUS placement, the serum creatinine level improved or stabilized in 82% of patients. The serum creatinine outcome difference between the groups with benign and malignant indications for PAUS placement was not statistically significant (= 0.145) but resolution of hydronephrosis was significantly better (= 0.008) in patients with benign indications. Percutaneous antegrade ureteric stent placement is a safe and effective means of relief for ureteric obstruction. The check nephrostogram following ureteric stent placement was unnecessary in the majority of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Finney RP (1978) Experience with new double J urethral catheter stent. J Urol 120:678–681

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Reznek RH, Talner LB (1984) Percutaneous nephrostomy. Radiol Clin North Am 22(2):393–406

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Banner MP (1989) Interventional radiology in the urinary tract. Current Imaging 1:10–20

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sharma SD, Persad RA, Haq A, et al. (1996) A review of antegrade stenting in the management of the obstructed kidney. Br J Urol 78(4):511–515

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hausegger KA, Portugaller HR (2006) Percutaneous nephrostomy and antegrade ureteral stenting: technique-indications-complications. Eur Radiol 16(9):2016–2030

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lu DS, Papanicolaou N, Girad M, et al. (1994) Percutaneous internal ureteral stent placement: review of technical issues and solutions in 50 consecutive cases. Clin Radiol 49(4):256–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hackethorn JC, Boren SR, Dotter CT, et al. (1985) Antegrade internal ureteral stenting: a technical refinement. Radiology 156(3):827–828

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Patel U, Abubacker MZ (2004) Ureteral stent placement without postprocedural nephrostomy tube: experience in 41 patients. Radiology 230(2):435–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gillian MT Watson, Uday Patel (2001) Primary antegrade ureteric stenting: prospective experience and cost-effectiveness analysis in 50 ureters. Clin Radiol 56(7):568–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kiang Hiong Tay.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soh, K.C., Tay, K.H., Tan, B.S. et al. Is the Routine Check Nephrostogram Following Percutaneous Antegrade Ureteric Stent Placement Necessary?. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31, 604–609 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-007-9128-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-007-9128-0

Keywords

Navigation