Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Single-Pass Percutaneous Liver Biopsy for Diffuse Liver Disease Using an Automated Device: Experience in 154 Procedures

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To describe our experience with ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous liver biopsies using the INRAD 18G Express core needle biopsy system.

Methods: One hundred and fifty-four consecutive percutaneous core liver biopsy procedures were performed in 153 men in a single institution over 37 months. The medical charts, pathology reports, and radiology files were retrospectively reviewed. The number of needle passes, type of guidance, change in hematocrit level, and adequacy of specimens for histologic analysis were evaluated.

Results: All biopsies were performed for histologic staging of chronic liver diseases. The majority of patients had hepatitis C (134/153, 90.2%). All patients were discharged to home after 4 hr of postprocedural observation. In 145 of 154 (94%) biopsies, a single needle pass was sufficient for diagnosis. US guidance was utilized in all but one of the procedures (153/154, 99.4%). The mean hematocrit decrease was 1.2% (44.1–42.9%). Pain requiring narcotic analgesia, the most frequent complication, occurred in 28 of 154 procedures (18.2%). No major complications occurred. The specimens were diagnostic in 152 of 154 procedures (98.7%).

Conclusions: Single-pass percutaneous US-guided liver biopsy with the INRAD 18G Express core needle biopsy system is safe and provides definitive pathologic diagnosis of chronic liver disease. It can be performed on an outpatient basis. Routine post-biopsy monitoring of hematocrit level in stable, asymptomatic patients is probably not warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. S Spiezia A Salvio C Di Somma et al. (2002) ArticleTitleThe efficacy of liver biopsy under ultrasonographic guidance on an outpatient basis Eur J Ultrasound 15 127–131 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0929-8266(02)00033-2 Occurrence Handle12423738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. S Sherlock (1945) ArticleTitleAspiration liver biopsy: Technique and diagnostic application Lancet II 397–401 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(45)91946-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. G Menghini (1958) ArticleTitleOne-second needle biopsy of the liver Gastroenterology 35 190–199 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaG1c7gsFGisg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle13562404

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. KD Lindor C Bru RS Jorgensen et al. (1996) ArticleTitleThe role of ultrasonography and automatic-needle biopsy in outpatient percutaneous liver biopsy Hepatology 23 1079–1083 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK283gs1GgtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1002/hep.510230522 Occurrence Handle8621137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. IT Gilmore A Burroughs InstitutionalAuthorNameMurray-Lyon et al. (1995) ArticleTitleIndications, methods, and outcomes of percutaneous liver biopsy in England and Wales: An audit by the British Society of Gastroenterology and the Royal College of Physicians of London Gut 36 437–441 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M3ht12ksw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1136/gut.36.3.437 Occurrence Handle7698705 Occurrence Handle1382461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. RJ Farrel PF Smiddy RM Pilkington et al. (1999) ArticleTitleGuided versus blind biopsy for chronic hepatitis C: Clinical benefits and costs J Hepatol 30 580–587 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0168-8278(99)80187-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Perrillo RP (1997) Role of liver biopsy. National Institutes of Health Conference 1997, March 24–26, Bethesda, Maryland (P)

  8. GL Davis (1994) ArticleTitlePrediction of response to interferon treatment of chronic hepatitis J Hepatol 21 1–3 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2Flt1Crsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0168-8278(94)80128-2 Occurrence Handle7963408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. AA Bravo SG Sheth S Chopra (2001) ArticleTitleLiver biopsy: Current concepts N Engl J Med 344 495–500 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7ksVehtw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM200102153440706 Occurrence Handle11172192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. F Piccinino E Sagnelli G Pascuale et al. (1986) ArticleTitleComplications following percutaneous liver biopsy A multicenter retrospective study on 68,276 biopsies. J Hepatol 2 165–173 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL287mvFGgsw%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. G Vautier B Scott D Jenkins (1994) ArticleTitleLiver biopsy: Blind or guided? BMJ 309 1455–1456 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M7gt1ensg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1455 Occurrence Handle7804036 Occurrence Handle2541611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. ZM Younoussi CJ Tera TG Ganiats et al. (1998) ArticleTitleUltrasound-guided liver biopsy for parenchymal liver disease Dig Dis Sci 43 46–50 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1018815802500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. KD Hopper CS Abendroth KW Strutz et al. (1993) ArticleTitleAutomated biopsy devices: A blinded evaluation Radiology 187 653–660 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s3mvVyrtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1148/radiology.187.3.8497611 Occurrence Handle8497611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. CH Janes KD Lindor (1993) ArticleTitleOutcome of patients hospitalized for complications after outpatient liver biopsy Ann Intern Med 118 96–98 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FpvVGgsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.7326/0003-4819-118-2-199301150-00003 Occurrence Handle8416324

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. DB McGill J Rakela AR Zinsmeister et al. (1991) ArticleTitleA 21-year experience with major hemorrhage after percutaneous liver biopsy Gastroenterology 99 1396–1400

    Google Scholar 

  16. P Rossi P Sileri P Gentileschi et al. (2001) ArticleTitlePercutaneous liver biopsy using an ultrasound-guided subcostal route Dig Dis Sci 46 128–132 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7nsFOhtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005571904713 Occurrence Handle11270776

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. JW Charboneau CC Reading TJ Welch (1990) ArticleTitleComputed tomographic and sonographic guided needle biopsy: Current techniques and new innovations AJR Am J Roentgenol 154 1–10 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3c7gt1agsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.2214/ajr.154.1.2104689 Occurrence Handle2104689

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. GH Mostbeck GR Wittich K Derfler et al. (1989) ArticleTitleOptimal needle size for renal biopsy: In vitro and in vivo evaluation Radiology 173 819–822 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2FkslKkuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1148/radiology.173.3.2813792 Occurrence Handle2813792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. JR Haaga JP LiPuma PJ Bryan et al. (1983) ArticleTitleClinical comparison of small and large caliber cutting needles for biopsy Radiology 146 665–667 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL3s7ksFWjsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1148/radiology.146.3.6828680 Occurrence Handle6828680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerant Rivera-Sanfeliz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rivera-Sanfeliz, G., Kinney, T.B., Rose, S.C. et al. Single-Pass Percutaneous Liver Biopsy for Diffuse Liver Disease Using an Automated Device: Experience in 154 Procedures. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 28, 584–588 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-004-0017-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-004-0017-5

Keywords

Navigation