Abstract
In recent years, the development of sewage treatment technologies has made many treatment options available in towns. Selecting the most appropriate alternative (MAA) can make the best use of existing resources to achieve the optimal effect, which has become a topical issue in academic circles. The Liao River basin in China is an important area for agricultural cultivation and animal husbandry, but it also suffers from water shortages and pollution. In this study, the fuzzy set theory (FST), the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) were combined as a scientific and effective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) model to optimize the sewage treatment technologies in town areas of the Liao River basin. It was found that compared with natural treatment technologies (such as constructed wetlands, stabilization ponds, etc.) and combination technologies (i.e., a combination of various technologies), single small-scale sewage treatment plant technologies (such as activated sludge process or sequencing batch reactor with small daily capacity) were more suitable for those areas. The indicator of construction costs was critical in this model, and the fluctuation of its weight might change the MAA. This study aims to provide a decision support framework for the future optimization of sewage treatment technologies in towns by combining economic, environmental, and social issues, rather than just focusing on the technical aspects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amiri MP (2010) Project selection for oil-fields development by using the AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst Appl 37:6218–6224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.103
Arroyo P, Molinos-Senante M (2018) Selecting appropriate wastewater treatment technologies using a choosing-by-advantages approach. Sci Total Environ 625:819–827. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.331
Castillo A, Vall P, Garrido-Baserba M, Comas J, Poch M (2017) Selection of industrial (food, drink and milk sector) wastewater treatment technologies: a multi-criteria assessment. J Clean Prod 143:180–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.132
Choguill CL (1996) Ten steps to sustainable infrastructure. Habitat Int 20:389–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-3975(96)00013-6
Garrido-Baserba M, Reif R, Molinos-Senante M, Larrea L, Castillo A, Verdaguer M, Poch M (2016) Application of a multi-criteria decision model to select of design choices for WWTPs. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18:1097–1109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1099-x
Giner-Santonja G, Aragones-Beltran P, Niclos-Ferragut J (2012) The application of the analytic network process to the assessment of best available techniques. J Clean Prod 25:86–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.012
Gomez-Lopez MD, Bayo J, Garcia-Cascales MS, Angosto JM (2009) Decision support in disinfection technologies for treated wastewater reuse. J Clean Prod 17:1504–1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2009.06.008
Ho G (2005) Technology for sustainability: the role of onsite, small and community scale technology. Water Sci Technol 51:15–20
Ho LT, Van Echelpoel W, Goethals PLM (2017) Design of waste stabilization pond systems: a review. Water Res 123:236–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.071
Hwang CL, Yoon K (1981) Multiple attribute decision making. Lecture Notes in Econom and Math Systems 404(4):287–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-48318-9
Ibanez-Fores V, Bovea MD (2016) A decision support tool for communicating the environmental performance of products and organisations from the ceramic sector. Clean Technol Environ Policy 18:123–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-015-0999-5
Ishizaka A, Labib A (2011) Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Syst Appl 38:14336–14345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143
Kalbar PP, Karmakar S, Asolekar SR (2012) Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: a scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach. J Environ Manag 113:158–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.025
Kalbar PP, Karmakar S, Asolekar SR (2013) The influence of expert opinions on the selection of wastewater treatment alternatives: a group decision-making approach. J Environ Manag 128:844–851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.06.034
Karimi AR, Mehrdadi N, Hashemian SJ, Bidhendi GRN, Moghaddam RT (2011) Selection of wastewater treatment process based on the analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy analytical hierarchy process methods. Int J Environ Sci Te 8:267–280. https://doi.org/10.1007/Bf03326215
Karsak EE, Tolga E (2001) Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making procedure for evaluating advanced manufacturing system investments. Int J Prod Econ 69:49–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5273(00)00081-5
Mahjouri M, Ishak MB, Torabian A, Abd Manaf L, Halimoon N, Ghoddusi J (2017) Optimal selection of iron and steel wastewater treatment technology using integrated multi-criteria decision-making techniques and fuzzy logic. Process Saf Environ Prot 107:54–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2017.01.016
Mardani A, Jusoh A, Zavadskas EK (2015) Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications—two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Syst Appl 42:4126–4148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.01.003
Massoud MA, Tarhini A, Nasr JA (2009) Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: applicability in developing countries. J Environ Manag 90:652–659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.001
McDaniels TL, Gregory RS, Fields D (1999) Democratizing risk management: successful public involvement in local water management decisions. Risk Anal 19:497–510. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00424.x
Mendoza GA, Prabhu R (2000) Development of a methodology for selecting criteria and indicators of sustainable forest management: a case study on participatory assessment. Environ Manag 26:659–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010123
Molinos-Senante M, Gomez T, Caballero R, Hernandez-Sancho F, Sala-Garrido R (2015) Assessment of wastewater treatment alternatives for small communities: an analytic network process approach. Sci Total Environ 532:676–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.06.059
Otterpohl R, Braun U, Oldenburg M (2003) Innovative technologies for decentralised water-, wastewater and biowaste management in urban and peri-urban areas. Water Sci Technol 48:23–32
Ouyang XG, Guo F, Shan D, Yu HY, Wang J (2015) Development of the integrated fuzzy analytical hierarchy process with multidimensional scaling in selection of natural wastewater treatment alternatives. Ecol Eng 74:438–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.11.006
Pickford J (1995) Low-cost sanitation: a survey of practical experience. Intermediate Technology Pub
Saaty TL (1977) Scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Math Psychol 15:234–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5
Sánchez-Lozano JM, Serna J, Dolón-Payán A (2015) Evaluating military training aircrafts through the combination of multi-criteria decision making processes with fuzzy logic. A case study in the Spanish Air Force Academy. Aerosp Sci Technol 42:58–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2014.12.028
Shahab A, Mehdi SRM, Aghajani BA (2016) Alunite processing method selection using the AHP and TOPSIS approaches under fuzzy environment. Int J Min Sci Techno 26:1017–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmst.2016.09.009
Singhirunnusorn W, Stenstrom MK (2009) Appropriate wastewater treatment systems for developing countries: criteria and indictor assessment in Thailand. Water Sci Technol 59:1873–1884. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.215
Socorro García-Cascales M, Teresa Lamata M, Miguel Sánchez-Lozano J (2011) Evaluation of photovoltaic cells in a multi-criteria decision making process. Ann Oper Res 199:373–391. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-011-1009-x
Triantaphyllou E, Sanchez A (1997) A sensitivity analysis approach for some deterministic multi-criteria decision-making methods. Decis Sci 28:151–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01306.x
van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11:229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Zanakis SH, Solomon A, Wishart N, Dublish S (1998) Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods. Eur J Oper Res 107:507–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00147-1
Zeng GM, Jiang R, Huang GH, Xu M, Li JB (2007) Optimization of wastewater treatment alternative selection by hierarchy grey relational analysis. J Environ Manag 82:250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.12.024
Zhang DQ, Jinadasa KB, Gersberg RM, Liu Y, Ng WJ, Tan SK (2014) Application of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in developing countries–a review of recent developments (2000–2013). J Environ Manag 141:116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.03.015
Zhou P, Ang BW, Poh KL (2006) Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: an update. Energy 31:2604–2622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2005.10.023
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Major Science and Technology Projects of China [grant numbers 2012ZX07202009].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, B., Tang, J., Li, Z. et al. Optimal Selection of Sewage Treatment Technologies in Town Areas: A Coupled Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model. Environmental Management 66, 709–721 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01338-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01338-w