Abstract
The controversial elk reduction program (elk hunt) in Grand Teton National Park, WY, has been a source of conflict since it was legislated in 1950. The hunt is jointly managed by the National Park Service and the Wyoming Game and Fish Department. This forced organizational partnership and the conflicting mandates of these two agencies have led to persistent conflict that seems irresolvable under the current decision-making process. To better understand the decision-making process and participant perspectives, we reviewed management documents, technical literature, and newspaper articles, and interviewed 35 key participants in this case. We used these data to analyze and appraise the adequacy of the decision-making process for the park elk hunt and to ask whether it reflects the common interest. We found deficiencies in all functions of the decision-making process. Neither the decisions made nor the process itself include diverse perspectives, nor do they attend to valid and appropriate participant concerns. Agency officials focus their attention on technical rather than procedural concerns, which largely obfuscates the underlying tension in the joint inter-jurisdictional management arrangement and ultimately contributes to the hunt’s annual implementation to the detriment of the common interest. We offer specific yet widely applicable recommendations to better approximate an inclusive and democratic decision-making process that serves the community’s common interests.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barmore WJ (1985) Natural resources management plan and environmental assessment, Grand Teton National Park. Rocky Mountain Region, National Park Service, Laramie
Boyce MS (1989) The Jackson elk herd: intensive wildlife management in North America. Cambridge University Press, New York
Brunner RD, Clark SG (1996) Making partnerships work in endangered species conservation: an introduction to the decision process. In: Wallace RL, Clark TW, Reading RP (eds) Endangered species update—special issue: an interdisciplinary approach to endangered species recovery: concepts, applications, cases, vol 19. School of Natural Resources and Environment, the University of Michigan, pp 74–80
Brunner RD, Coburn CH, Cromley CM, Klein RA, Olson EA (2002) Finding common ground: governance and natural resources in the American West. Yale University Press, New Haven
Brunner RD, Steelman T, Coe-Juell L, Cromley CM, Edwards C, Tucker D (2005) Adaptive governance: integrating science, policy, and decision-making. Columbia University, New York
Clark TW (1997) Participants and perspectives: Complexity of joint action. In: Clark TW (ed) Averting extinction: reconstructing endangered species recovery. Yale University Press, New Haven, pp 28–41
Clark SG (2001) Wildlife resources: The elk of Jackson Hole, Wyoming. In: Burger J, Ostrom E, Norgaard RB, Policansky D, Goldstein BD (eds) Protecting the commons: a framework for resource management in the Americas. Island Press, Washington, pp 91–108
Clark SG (2002) The policy process: a practical guide for natural resources professionals. Yale University Press, New Haven
Clark SG (2009) An informational approach to sustainability: “intelligence” in conservation and natural resource management policy. J Sustain For 28:636–662
Clark TW, Brewer GD (2000) The National Elk Refuge and the Jackson Hole elk herd: management appraisal and recommendations. In: Clark TW, Casey D, Halverson A (eds) Developing sustainable management policy for the National Elk Refuge, Wyoming. Yale Sch For Environ Stud Bull 104:9–22
Clark SG, Rutherford MB (2005) The institutional system of wildlife management: Making it more effective. In: Clark SG, Rutherford MB, Casey D (eds) Coexisting with large carnivores: lessons from greater yellowstone. Island Press, Washington, D.C., pp 211–253
Clark SG, Rutherford MB (2014) Large carnivore conservation: integrating science and policy in the North American West. Chicago University Press, Chicago
Craighead JJ (1952) A biological and economic appraisal of the Jackson Hole elk herd. New York Zoological Society and the Conservation Foundation, New York
Dahl RA (1998) On democracy. Yale University Press, New Haven
Halverson A (2000) The National Elk Refuge and the Jackson Hole Elk Herd: Management appraisal and recommendations. In: Clark TW, Casey D, Halverson A (eds) Developing sustainable management policy for the National Elk Refuge, Wyoming. Yale Sch For Environ Stud Bull 104:9–22
Hatch C (20 October 2010) Wapiti hunt draws flak. Report. Jackson Hole News & Guide
Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15:1277–1288
Keiter R (2013) To conserve unimpaired: the evolution of the national park idea. Island Press, Washington
Koshmrl M (11 February 2015) Refuge plan a partial success. Report. Jackson Hole News & Guide
Koshmrl M (24 December 2012) Other parks’ elk hunts suggest options for Grand Teton. Report. Jackson Hole News & Guide
Kumar NL, Stern LW, Anderson JC (1993) Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Acad Manage J 36:1633–1651
Lasswell HD (1956) The decision process: seven categories of functional analysis. Bureau of Government Research, College Park
Lasswell HD (1971) A pre-view of policy sciences. American Elsevier, New York
Lasswell HD, Kaplan A (1950) Power and society: a framework for political inquiry. Yale University Press, New Haven
Lasswell HD, McDougal MS (1992) Jurisprudence for a free society. New Haven Press, New Haven
Leopold AS, Cain SA, Cottam CM, Gabrielson IN, Kimball TL (1963) Wildlife management in the national parks. Government Printing Office, Washington
McDougal MS, Lasswell HD, Chen LC (1980) Human rights and world public order: the basic policies of an international law of dignity. Yale University Press, New Haven
McLaughlin GP, Primm S, Rutherford MB (2014) Participatory projects for coexistence: Rebuilding civil society. In: Clark SG, Rutherford MB, Casey D (eds) Coexisting with large carnivores: lessons from greater yellowstone. Island Press, Washington, pp 177–210
National Park Service (NPS), U.S. Department of the Interior (2014) Superintendent’s compendium 2014, Grand Teton National Park and John D. Rockefeller, Jr. Memorial Parkway. Moose
National Park Service Advisory Board Science Committee (2012) Revisiting Leopold: resource stewardship in the national parks. Washington, DC
Oppenheimer DJ, Richie L, Clark SG (2014) Collaborative grizzly bear management in Banff National Park: Learning from a prototype. In: Clark SG, Rutherford MB (eds) Large carnivore conservation: Integrating science and policy in the North American West. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 215–250
Ostrom E (2005) Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University, Princeton
Pielke RA (2007) The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press, New York
Richie L, Oppenheimer DJ, Clark SG (2012) Social process in grizzly bear management: lessons for collaborative governance in natural resource policy. Policy Sci 45:265–291
Righter RW (1982) Crucible for conservation: the struggle for Grand Teton National Park. Grand Teton Natural History Association, Jackson
Righter RW (2014) Peaks, politics, & passion: Grand Teton National Park comes of age. Grand Teton Natural History Association, Moose
Rutherford MB, Gibeau ML, Clark SG, Chamberlain EC (2009) Interdisciplinary problem solving workshops for grizzly bear conservation in Banff National Park, Canada. Policy Sci 42:163–187
Schön DA (1983) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. BasicBooks, New York
Smith BL (2012) Where elk roam: conservation and biopolitics of our national elk herd. Lyons Press, Guilford
Starks H, Trinidad SB (2007) Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qual Health Res 17:1372–1380
Steelman TA, DuMond ME (2009) Serving the common interest in U.S. forest policy: a case study of the healthy Forests Restoration Act. Environ Manage 43:396–410
Taylor D, Clark SG (2005) Management context: People, animals, and institutions. In: Clark SG, Rutherford MB, Casey DE (eds) Coexisting with large carnivores: lessons from greater yellowstone. Island Press, Washington, pp 28–69
Titscher S, Meyer M, Wodak R, Vetter E (2000) Methods of text and discourse analysis. Sage, Thousand Oaks
U.S. Congress (1916) The National Park Service Organic Act, 39 STAT 535. Washington, DC
U.S. Congress (1950) Act of September 14, 1950, Public Law 81-787, Section 6(a), 64 STAT 840-849, which established the Grand Teton National Park in Wyoming. Washington, DC
U.S. Department of the Interior (DOI), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Park Service (2007) Record of Decision, National Elk Refuge and Grand Teton National Park Final Bison and Elk Management Plan and Environmental Impact Statement. Washington, DC
Vogel JM (2006) Persistent policy problems. Dissertation, University of Colorado
Wilbrecht J, Robbins R (1979) History of the National Elk Refuge. In: Boyce MS, Hayden-Wing LD (eds) North American elk: ecology, behavior, and management. University of Wyoming, Laramie, pp 248–254
Wilkinson K, Clark SG, Burch W (2007) Other voices, other ways, better practice: Bridging local and professional knowledge. Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, Report No. 14:1–57
Wyoming Game and Fish Department (2013a) Job Completion Report: Elk. https://wgfd.wyo.gov/web2011/Departments/Wildlife/pdfs/JCR_BGJACKSON_ELK_20130006053.pdf. Accessed 28 January 2015
Wyoming Game and Fish Department (2013b) Harvest Report: Elk. http://wgfd.wyo.gov/web2011/Departments/Hunting/pdfs/HR2013_ELK0005991.pdf. Accessed 29 August 2014
Wyoming Game and Fish Department (2013c) Annual Report. http://wgfd.wyo.gov/web2011/Departments/WGFD/pdfs/WGFDANNUALREPORT_20130005237.pdf. Accessed 29 August 2014
Vernon ME, Clark SG (in revision) Addressing a persistent policy problem: the elk hunt in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming. Soc Nat Resour
Vernon ME, Bischoff-Mattson Z, Clark SG (in revision). Discourses of elk hunting and grizzly bear incidents in Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming. Hum Dimens Wildl
Young OR (2013) On environmental governance: sustainability, efficiency, and equity. Paradigm Press, Boulder
Acknowledgments
We were supported by the Schiff Fund for Research on Wildlife, Habitat, and the Environment, the Carpenter-Sperry Research Fund, and the Williams Fund through Yale University’s School of Forestry & Environmental Studies. The Northern Rockies Conservation Cooperative provided logistic support. T. Mangelsen made his library of newspaper articles available to us. We thank all individuals who consented to be interviewed. Finally, we thank L. Dorsey, D. Casey, and four anonymous reviewers who critically reviewed the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Clark, S.G., Vernon, M.E. Governance Challenges in Joint Inter-Jurisdictional Management: The Grand Teton National Park, Wyoming, Elk Case. Environmental Management 56, 286–299 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0515-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0515-z