Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Collective Action in the Management of a Tropical Dry Forest Ecosystem: Effects of Mexico’s Property Rights Regime

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dilemmas of natural resources governance have been a central concern for scholars, policy makers, and users. Major debates occur over the implications of property rights for common resources management. After the Mexican Revolution (1910–1917), land was distributed mainly as ejidos conceived as a hereditary but unalienable collective form of property. In 1992, a new Agrarian Law was decreed that allows individual ownership by removing various restrictions over the transfer of land. Scholars have examined the reform mainly focusing on land-tenure changes and environmental fragmentation. This study examines how the new ownership regime is affecting collective decision-making in ejidos located in a tropical dry forest (TDF) ecosystem. Information on decision-making processes before and after the 1992 reform was gathered through 52 interviews conducted in four ejidos selected along a gradient including agricultural, cattle-raising, and TDF use. The new individualized land property system reduced collective action in ejidos but did not trigger it. Collective action responses to the 1992 reform were buffered by self-organization each ejido already had. Heterogeneous users who shared a short history and showed little understanding of TDF and low dependence on its resources seemed to explain why ejidos have not been able to share a sense of community that would shape the construction of institutions for the collective management of forest resources. However, when a resource is scarce and highly valuable such as water the same users showed capacities for undertaking costly co-operative activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal A (2001) Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Dev 29:1649–1672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A (2007) Forests, governance, and sustainability: common property theory and its contributions. Int J Commons 1:111–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcorn JB, Toledo VM (1998) Resilient resource management in Mexico’s forest ecosystems: the contribution of property rights. In: Berkes F, Folke C (eds) Linking social and ecological systems. Management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 216–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Assies W (2008) Land tenure and tenure regimes in Mexico: an overview. J Agrar Change 8:33–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barsimantov J, Racelis A, Barnes G, DiGiano M (2010) Tenure, tourism and timber in Quintana Roo, Mexico: land tenure changes in forest ejidos after Agrarian Reforms. Int J Commons 4:293–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter J, Eyles J (1997) Evaluating qualitative research in social geography: establishing ‘rigour’ in interview analysis. Trans Inst Br Geogr 22:505–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Folke C (1998) Linking social and ecological systems management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Boege E (2008) El patrimonio biocultural de los pueblos indígenas de México. Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Comisión Nacional para el Desarrollo de los Pubelos Indígenas, México DF

    Google Scholar 

  • Braña J, Martínez A (2005) El PROCEDE y su impacto en la toma de decisiones sobre los recursos de uso común. Gaceta ecológica 75:35–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray BD (1996) Of land tenure, forests, and water: the impact of the reforms to article 27 on the Mexican environment. In: Randall L (ed) Reforming Mexico’s Agrarian Reform. ME Sharpe, New York, pp 215–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Bray DB, Klepeis P (2005) Deforestation, forest transitions, and institutions for sustainability in southeastern Mexico, 1900–2000. Environ Hist 11:195–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray DB, Merino L (2004) Los bosques comunitarios de México. Logros y desafíos. Ford Foundation–The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation–SEMARNAT–FIU–CCMSS–Forest Trends–IIS–UNAM–CIDE, México DF

  • Burgos A, Maass JM (2004) Vegetation change associated with land-use in tropical dry forest areas of Western Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:475–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bye R, Cervantes L, Rendón B (2002) Etnobotánica en la región de Chamela, Jalisco, México. In: Noguera FA, Rivera JHV, García-Aldrete AN, Quesada-Avendaño M (eds) Historia natural de Chamela Instituto de Biología. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México DF, pp 545–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Castillo A, Magaña A, Pujadas A, Martínez L, Godínez C (2005) Understanding the interaction of rural people with ecosystems: a case study in a tropical dry forest of Mexico. Ecosystems 8:630–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo A, Godínez C, Schroeder N, Galicia C, Pujadas A, Martínez L (2009) El bosque tropical seco en riesgo: Conflictos entre uso agropecuario, desarrollo turístico y provisión de servicios ecosistémicos en la Costa de Jalisco, México. Interciencia 34:844–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos G, García A (1995) Conserving neotropical biodiversity, the role of dry forest in western México. Conserv Biol 9:1349–1356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceballos G, Székely A, García A, Rodríguez P, Noguera F (1999) Programa de Manejo de la Reserva de la Biosfera Chamela-Cuixmala. Instituto Nacional de Ecología Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca, México DF

    Google Scholar 

  • Challenger A (1998) Utilización y conservación de los ecosistemas terrestres de México: Pasado, presente y futuro. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad-UNAM-Agrupación Sierra Madre del Sur SC, México DF

    Google Scholar 

  • Chhatre A, Agrawal A (2008) Forest commons and local enforcement. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:13286–13291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK, Lincoln S (2000) Handbook of qualitative research, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Diario Oficial de la Federación (DOF) (1992) Ley Agraria. http://info4.juridicas.unam.mx/ijure/tcfed/12.htm?s. Accessed 4 Apr 2011

  • Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ensminger J (1996) Culture and property rights. In: Hanna SS, Folke C, Maler KG (eds) Right to nature: ecological, economic cultural and political principles of institutions for the environment. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 179–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Farley K, Ojeda-Revah L, Atkinson EE, Eaton-González BR (2012) Changes in land use, land tenure, and landscape fragmentation in the Tijuana River Watershed following reform of the ejido sector. Land Use Policy 29:187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores VO, Gérez P (1994) Biodiversidad y Conservación en México: Vertebrados, Vegetación y Uso del suelo. CONABIO, UNAM, México DF

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson CC, Becker CD (2000) A lack of institutional demand: why a strong local community in western Ecuador fails to protect its forest. In: Gibson CC, McKean MA, Ostrom E (eds) People and forests. Communities, institutions and governance. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 135–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (2001) Principales Resultados por Localidad, Estados Unidos Mexicanos, XII Censo de Población y Vivienda, 2000. http://www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/Proyectos/ccpv/cpv2000/default.aspx. Accessed 31 Mar 2011

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (2010) Estadísticas históricas de México 2009. http://www.inegi.org.mx/prod_serv/contenidos/espanol/bvinegi/productos/integracion/pais/historicas10/Tema6_Salarios.pdf. Accessed 31 Mar 2011

  • Jodha NS (1996) Property rights and development. In: Hanna SS, Folke C, Maler KG (eds) Right to nature: ecological, economic cultural and political principles of institutions for the environment. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 205–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis J (2002) Agrarian change and privatization of ejido land in Northern Mexico. J Agrar Change 2:401–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luers AL, Naylor RL, Matson PA (2006) A case study of land reform and coastal land transformation in southern Sonora, Mexico. Land Use Policy 23:436–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maass JM, Balvanera P, Castillo A, Daily GC, Mooney HA, Ehrlich P, Quesada M, Miranda A, Jaramillo VJ, García-Oliva F, Martínez-Yrizar A, Cotler H, López-Blanco J, Pérez-Jiménez A, Búrquez A, Tinoco C, Ceballos G, Barraza L, Ayala R, Sarukhán J (2005) Ecosystem services of tropical dry forests: insights from longterm ecological and social research on the Pacific Coast of Mexico. Ecol Soc 10:17

    Google Scholar 

  • McKean MA (2000) Common property: what is it, what is it good for and what makes it work. In: Gibson CC, McKean MA, Ostrom E (eds) People and forests. Communities, institutions and governance. The MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 27–56

    Google Scholar 

  • McKean M, Ostrom E (1995) Common property regimes in the forest: just a relic from the past? Unasylva 180:3–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Merino L (2004) Conservación o deterioro: El impacto de las políticas públicas en las instituciones comunitarias y en las prácticas de uso de los recursos forestales. Instituto Nacional de Ecología (INE-SEMARNAT), México DF

    Google Scholar 

  • Noguera F, Vega Rivera JH, Aldrete García AN (2002) Introducción. In: Noguera FA, Rivera JHV, García-Aldrete AN, Quesada-Avendaño M (eds) Historia natural de Chamela. Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México DF, pp xv–xxi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2001) The puzzle of counterproductive property rights reforms: a conceptual analysis. In: de Janvry A, Gordillo G, Platteau JP, Sadoulet E (eds) Access to land, rural poverty, and public action. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 129–150

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2003) How types of goods and property rights jointly affect collective action. J Theor Politics 15:239–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:15181–15187

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2009) A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social–ecological systems. Science 325:419–422

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E, Nagendra N (2006) Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:19224–19231

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paré L (1995) Transformación de los sistemas productivos y deterioro del medio ambiente en una región étnica del trópico veracruzano. In: Palos Juan (ed) Carton de Grammont H (ed) Globalización, deterioro ambiental y reorganización social en el campo. UNAM, México DF, pp 122–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton M (1990) Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage Publications, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez H (2011) Necesidades de información para el manejo de los socio-ecosistemas de la región Chamela-Cuixmala, Jalisco. Dissertation, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

  • Perramond EP (2008) The rise, fall, and reconfiguration of the Mexican ejido. Geogr Rev 98:356–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretty J (2003) Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302:1912–1914

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Registro Agrario Nacional (RAN) (2012) Padrón e Historial de Nucleos Agrarios (PHINA). http://phina.ran.gob.mx/phina2/. Accessed 24 Mar 2012

  • Richards M (1997) Common property resource institutions and forest management in Latin America. Dev Change 28:95–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson C (1993) Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner–researchers. Blackwell Publisher, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rzedowsky J (1991) Diversidad y orígenes de la flora fanerogámica mexicana: una apreciación analítica preliminar. Acta Botánica Mexicana 15:47–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Azofeifa A, Quesada M, Cuevas-Reyes P, Castillo A, Sánchez G (2009) Land cover and conservation in the area of influence of the Chamela-Cuixmala Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Forest Ecol Manag 258:907–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarukhán J, Larson J (2001) When the commons become less tragic: land tenure, social organization, and fair trade in Mexico. In: Burger J, Ostrom E, Norgaard RB, Policansky D, Goldstein BD (eds) Protecting the commons. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 45–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager E, Ostrom E (1992) Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Econ 68:249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seale C (2000) The quality of qualitative research. SAGE Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • SEMARNAT (2002) Programa estratégico para conservar los ecosistemas y su biodiversidad. Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, México DF

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor SJ, Bogdan R (1987) Introducción a los métodos cualitativos de investigación. La búsqueda de significados. Paidós, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM (1996) The ecological consequences of the 1992 Agrarian Law of Mexico. In: Randall L (ed) Reforming Mexico’s Agrarian Reform. ME Sharpe, New York, pp 247–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Trawick P (2001) Successfully governing the commons: principles of social organization in an Andean irrigation system. Hum Ecol 29:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trejo I, Dirzo R (2000) Deforestation of seasonally dry tropical forest: a national and local analysis in Mexico. Biol Conserv 94:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vargas MA, Ochoa F, Danemann GD (2008) Tenencia de la tierra y conservación de tierras privadas. In: Danemann GD, Ezcurra E (eds) Bahía de los Angeles: recursos naturales y comunidad. Línea base. SEMARNAT, INE, Pronatura Noroeste A.C. San Diego Natural History Museum, ciudad? México DF, pp 679–693

  • Velázquez A, Bocco G, Torres A (2001) Turning scientific approaches into practical conservation actions: the case of Comunidad Indígena de Nuevo San Juan Parangaricutiro, México. Environ Manag 5:216–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Warman A (2001) El campo mexicano en el siglo XX. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México DF

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin RK (2003) Case study research. Design and methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to offer our immense gratitude to all interviewees that took part in the study. We also thank Lucía Martínez, Karin Troncoso, Gustavo Verduzco, Abel Verduzco, Salvador Araiza, Alejandra González Manjarres y Ana Castrejón for their support. To Nelly Horak and Miramanni M. Mishkin who provided valuable assistance with the English language; three anonymous reviewers and editors help to improve the manuscript. We would also like to acknowledge support from Fondo Mixto CONACYT-Jalisco # 99050, and from OEA-LASPAU Fellowship (to N.S.).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that this research is in compliance with Mexico’s current laws and that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto Argentino de Investigaciones de las Zonas Áridas (IADIZA), CONICET, CC 507, 5500, Mendoza, Argentina

    Natalia Mariel Schroeder

  2. Centro de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Antigua carretera a Patzcuaro 8701, Apartado Postal 27-3 (Sta Ma. Guido), 58190, Morelia, Mexico

    Natalia Mariel Schroeder & Alicia Castillo

Authors
  1. Natalia Mariel Schroeder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alicia Castillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Mariel Schroeder.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schroeder, N.M., Castillo, A. Collective Action in the Management of a Tropical Dry Forest Ecosystem: Effects of Mexico’s Property Rights Regime. Environmental Management 51, 850–861 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9980-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-012-9980-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation